Norwegian University paper on incels (including quotes from members here),
(((They))) hate high IQ thread posters tbh nglwhy wont my fellow academics acknowledge me
Why would someone willfully cite material that discredits their own writings, of course they'll mostly cite a bunch of stuff that makes us look like idiots or crazy
World War II Nuclear Physicist IQ
P
jfl they know who i am
i am just too based they are scared of me
@Sparrow's Song @Edmund_Kemper thoughts?
Y
why wont my fellow academics acknowledge me
It interferes with the narrative they are trying to present about sites like these.
Discussions that take mirror to society and the actions of normies are avoided or given lip service at best.
E
Tfw not featured
unless their help is a state mandated gf or free hookers idgaf what this studies results are
I hope she got an F for not concluding that women need to have their rights taken away and return to a forced monogamy society.
I'm kind of butthurt that they didn't feature me tbh...
Galileo Galilei IQ
probably some norwegian incel did that research jfl
tfw never featured
C
Same.
D
Why am I being studied like a lab rat?
D
Fuck man we are brutally mogged even on incel forumsDamn I didn't make it.
Y
Would be partly solved by making sections with high IQ discussions and venting member access only.
Why do all these gay papers have a selection bias and hone in on one/two-liner shitposts and call it a day? Such lazy research.
I love how they ramble on about how the whole ideology is that "incels is characterized as a group consisting exclusively of men with very misogynistic opinions." Fuckin lying fucks, it's anyone that didn't have sex, stop trying to redefine the word just because the actual term doesn't make people hate us (except as being genetic trash).
Also the article claims that we proclaim incels proclaim "Society has to masculinity as they almost adore Chadsom for an ideal of masculinity", but this is not true, instead there a certain group of men that get almost all the attention from women because of their looks, even at a young age. We post studies here proving that looks mean more than anything, but they don't actually adress any of these claims, just saying we claim these things as if we don't reference scientific studies or statistics.
Based ngl
D
Critical theory replaced scientific method.
I should take inspiration to leech money like them.
Writing some bs paper, I mean study.
Writing some bs paper, I mean study.
no it's only those pre 2020
Damn man, didn´t know i was quoted in a university paper. Thank you for posting that stuff.
Imaging studying for almost 10 years to get a phd just to write articles about ugly virgins like us.
She´s a becky but i guess it doesn´t really matter because chad only
Attachments
Written by a Bachelor's student, so it's not really a credible academic paper
Similar threads
udeactive
Users who are viewing this thread
