But that's not what you said. You said that using it as a common noun or an adjective was wrong.
It is wrong, but if you look at how I used it I didn’t say “if she sees a guy that is a chad” I said if she sees a CHAD. Which effectively makes CHAD the subject instead of an improper noun/SECOND PRONOUN
It is wrong, but if you look at how I used it I didn’t say “if she sees a guy that is a chad” I said if she sees a CHAD. Which effectively makes CHAD the subject instead of an improper noun/SECOND PRONOUN
As for when I said MORE Chad notice how I didn’t say more of A chad. I said that because it would have to mean the individual is more so perfect in terms of looks and attaining bitches than previous CHAD is
Let me give you a sort of example. In the military “Jodie” is used to refer to a man who is fucking your girlfriend while you’re in basic or shipped off. In one of the cadences (which is a song a platoon could march to) the verbiage is “Jody’s got your girl at home”, NOT “A JODY HAS YOUR GIRL AT HOME”.
The same could be said for CHAD considering their similar uses in speech. CHAD in our terminology is already relating to a top 20% attractive man that gets BITCHES. So often it makes no sense to say “JOSH IS A CHAD” or even “JOSH IS CHAD” we simply have to say “HE IS CHAD” or “CHAD” 90% of the time because their way of getting bitches or looks indicates so, simply PUT if Chad is in a picture we will identify him immediately and say “chad in the corner” or if it’s a bunch of them we would say “CHADS”.
when you mentioned me saying a Chad I used it to describe an imaginary situation where CHAD was the subject, and we know who chad is so I didn’t need to label or point out something that makes CHAD CHAD.
Furthermore the way we as incels use CHAD is not exclusively as I mentioned but Most of the time it is since we KNOW who and what represents Chad. Whereas normies will use it to describe someone or something IMPROPERLY.
NEVER have I seen an incel say something along the lines of “(insert name) is such a Chad.” But normies use that verbiage.
FURTHERMOORE, the way which Chad himself is defined is usually a single man so more often than not we won’t say “(name) IS CHAD”. And the use of CHADS is insinuating more of these men.
OVERALL though Chad is not an emotional or personality type. CHAD is a being or BEINGS which represent the best guy who gets all the bitches. Meanwhile normies see it as some guy Who ACTS “alpha” or has those characteristics. Which makes no sense because they should just use the term ALPHA for such a man instead of a whole fucking name to describe a single word. For EXAMPLE:
“John is ALPHA”
OR
“JOHN IS CHAD”
NO, JOHNS NAME IS FUCKING JOHN YOU RETARD, YOU JUST USED A PROPER NOUN TO DESCRIBE ANOTHER PROPER NOUN WHEN YOU COULD REPLACE “CHAD” WITH ALPHA SINCE YOU DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT CHAD MEANS.