Blackpill Normies thinking that attracting a girl is about money/job title is very telling

[Deleted member 5861]

In a bunch of comment sections I see normies always saying the secret to getting girls is "money." This is also something I commonly hear in real life / media as well. Besides that they also always talk about job titles as if that makes any kind of significance. Who even cares what your actual job is, excluding the pay it gives you?
"WOW, you work at a bank. I suddently think you are sexy!!!"

JFL at their naivety. If the difference between getting girls is the size of your bank account, you are a betabux. The girl is also very materialistic, the type of person to be very shallow, status-obsessed, etc. Not a loyal, caring, honest type of person.

normies think the secret to getting girls is money when in reality:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18211175

Money is just as attractive in a man as it is to a woman. As in it is not sexy...it just helps bribe them to deal with you.
(also that chart was borrowed from this thread https://incels.is/threads/study-sho...oks-personality-money-for-both-genders.60460/ so give RageAgainstTDL credit for finding it)

 

[blackshark]

money gives you authority, yes they will be attracted to you if you have money and statuts.

 

[ADD Sufferer]

Well can you blame them? The only way average/unattractive men can get a girl is beta provider marriage. I hope people browsing these forums will not fall for that. I know MGTOW is considered a cope but the statistics are out there. Better to be alove that some old, wrinkled, post wall harpy or even worse, divorced and taken to the cleaners.

 

[BRCel123]

It's all about LMS, then yeah, money and status play a huge part

 

[VisVoi]

Normies think it's personality, TheRedPill thinks it is personality and money, the blackpill is that it is a combination of Looks/Money/Status and that personality has nothing to do with it.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

the blackpill is that it is a combination of Looks/Money/Status and that personality has nothing to do with it.

“It turns out that killing people is an effective way to elicit the attention of many women: virtually every serial killer, including Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, and David Berkowitz, have received love letters from large numbers of female fans” (p. 98).
“[Their] inner cavewoman knows Doormat Man would become Sabertooth Tiger Lunch in short order” (p .97).

Psychology Today had an article that confirmed and analyzed how women desire men who are violent, mean, and show criminal behavior, with much thanks to the book mentioned above.


"women demonstrate a strong erotic preference for dominant men. Or toward what’s now commonly referred to as alpha males—in the authors’ words, men who are 'strong, confident, [and] swaggering [as in 'cocky,' and the pun is intended].' Unfortunately, what these descriptors often imply is behavior sufficiently bearish, self-centered, and insensitive as to often cross the line into a physical, mental, and emotional abuse that can be downright brutal."
"there’s something in their native wiring that makes a great many of them susceptible to 'bad boys.'"
"many women (at least secretly, or subliminally) can’t help but be drawn toward cold-blooded, controlling, 'bad boys' whose dominance symbolizes quite the opposite of what in relationships they’re consciously seeking."
"many women experience as enticing the idea of surrendering to a powerful male figure because of its very riskiness. Curiously, such an acutely felt threat can actually be eroticized by women’s minds into exceptional sexual excitement so compelling that (at least on a fantasy level) it’s almost irresistible."
status holds some kind of relation to your personality. Thug status.

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

“It turns out that killing people is an effective way to elicit the attention of many women: virtually every serial killer, including Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, and David Berkowitz, have received love letters from large numbers of female fans” (p. 98).
“[Their] inner cavewoman knows Doormat Man would become Sabertooth Tiger Lunch in short order” (p .97).

Psychology Today had an article that confirmed and analyzed how women desire men who are violent, mean, and show criminal behavior, with much thanks to the book mentioned above.


"women demonstrate a strong erotic preference for dominant men. Or toward what’s now commonly referred to as alpha males—in the authors’ words, men who are 'strong, confident, [and] swaggering [as in 'cocky,' and the pun is intended].' Unfortunately, what these descriptors often imply is behavior sufficiently bearish, self-centered, and insensitive as to often cross the line into a physical, mental, and emotional abuse that can be downright brutal."
"there’s something in their native wiring that makes a great many of them susceptible to 'bad boys.'"
"many women (at least secretly, or subliminally) can’t help but be drawn toward cold-blooded, controlling, 'bad boys' whose dominance symbolizes quite the opposite of what in relationships they’re consciously seeking."
"many women experience as enticing the idea of surrendering to a powerful male figure because of its very riskiness. Curiously, such an acutely felt threat can actually be eroticized by women’s minds into exceptional sexual excitement so compelling that (at least on a fantasy level) it’s almost irresistible."
status holds some kind of relation to your personality. Thug status.

Nuke this dogshit planet already

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

Well can you blame them? The only way average/unattractive men can get a girl is beta provider marriage. I hope people browsing these forums will not fall for that. I know MGTOW is considered a cope but the statistics are out there. Better to be alove that some old, wrinkled, post wall harpy or even worse, divorced and taken to the cleaners.

Becoming a beta provider to an "ex" whore is worse than dying as a black mage tbh.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Nuke this dogshit planet already

Oh there is more than that
The desire to expel unselfish members from the group.
Parks, Craig D.,Stone, Asako B.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 99(2), Aug 2010, 303-310
"An initial study investigating tolerance of group members who abuse a public good surprisingly showed that unselfish members (those who gave much toward the provision of the good but then used little of the good) were also targets for expulsion from the group...A fourth study suggested that the target is seen by some as establishing an undesirable behavior standard and by others as a rule breaker. Individuals who formed either perception expressed a desire for the unselfish person to be removed from the group."

To put it in simpler terms, being altruistic and friendly is just as likely to cause people to reject you as those who are completely selfish and purely look out for their needs only. The study found no significant difference. This contradicts the mainstream advice that having a "good personality" will cause people, including women, to like you. They will hate you just as much as someone who practically steals from them. This is also reflected in the workplace, as "agreeable" men (peaceful and friendly) are paid significantly less than their disagreeable counterparts.


"Overall, across the first three studies, men who are one standard deviation below the mean on agreeableness earn an average of 18.31% ($9,772) more than men one standard deviation above the mean on agreeableness. Meanwhile, the “disagreeableness premium” for women was only 5.47% ($1,828). Thus, the income premium for disagreeableness is more than three times stronger for men than for women."

So as we could see, the price of being nice when you are a man is a staggering 18% of your income throughout life. It is also far stronger in males than females. So this means that nice men in the first study would have been rejected even more often than the nice women. This suggests that nice men are rejected more often than men who are completely selfish and practically steal off of everyone.

 

[Swagwaffle]

Op always has high iq graphs to prove his points +respect

money gives you authority, yes they will be attracted to you if you have money and statuts.

attracted but not sexually attracted to u.

There is a fine line and difference.

I hear too many stories where old rich guy with stacy gets cheated on by chads. Stacy returns back because he has $ to support her. But she will always cheat when she needs that sexual fix.

 

[Angry_runt]

money gives you authority, yes they will be attracted to you if you have money and statuts.

Wrong. They may hook up with or marry you, but they will never be attracted to a guy with money. In that they're exactly like prostitutes, except if they marry you they can take half your shit. As for status, I don't know about that. Look at Louis CK and Harvey Weinstein and Bill O'Reilly and Matt Lauer and all those other rich high status guys who women simply did not want.

 

[Ninrod]

Betabux works many times. Guys here are too idealistic.

 

[Angry_runt]

Betabux works many times. Guys here are too idealistic.

Works in that she's attracted to the beta bux guy? Or works that she prostitutes herself at 50 times the market rate before she divorce-rapes him?

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Betabux works many times. Guys here are too idealistic.

That doesn't change the fact that it would be a very hard fact to accept for guys who managed to clinch a wife. It is also a pillar of the blackpill. A very large amount of men will either be incels or forced to betabux in order to get anything.

Wrong. They may hook up with or marry you, but they will never be attracted to a guy with money. In that they're exactly like prostitutes, except if they marry you they can take half your shit. As for status, I don't know about that. Look at Louis CK and Harvey Weinstein and Bill O'Reilly and Matt Lauer and all those other rich high status guys who women simply did not want.

status definitely helps if you are like a musician or something. The key is you need social power. A nerdy beta guy being a doctor isn't going to make him high smv (excluding betabux route).

 

[Karabim]

money only really starts to matter in the high extremes e.g millionaires and billionaires. Thats why the stated importance of money is much higher than the actual importance. When women state that money is important they are thinking about millionaires.

 

[Ninrod]

Betabux can works if the guy is not the submissive-beta type. With manly personality, foids can develop genuine affection and even sexual attraction towards him. Nothing is granted thou.

 

[Ub2w]

Honestly i disagree with putting "money" in LMS, it should be Face and status only, since those things are inseparable to you a roastie that is attracted by those features is attracted to something can't be separated from your person, is genuine.

Getting bitches trough money is not different buying escorts that will be disgusted by you but still want your cash, besides with the current climate a cumdumpster can just easily divorce and take half of your shit from itself, not mentioning that since they can make their own income it will not hell to get sex until they plan to settle, unless you plan is to betabuxx or you have aspirations of becoming a russian billonarie-tier in terms of economic power that have various congressman in their pockets, focus in looksmaxing and statusmaxxing, money then to follow after those two anyway.

 

[monkeyman]

When I was young and had aspirations of becoming normal I thought having a good white collar job would make me more attractive. Now that I realize it doesn't matter to women Im okay with just having a low paying job, as long as it provides benefits and I can make enough to pay rent and buy groceries.

 

[PhenomSkillz]

Normalfaggots completely neglect the idea of sex.

 

[Anger]

Normalcucks are incapable of rational thinking, they judge their beliefs by emotions

 

[EthnicelNL]

Betabux mindset.