67InchesSubhuman
Recruit
★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2022
- Posts
- 381
Sorry but she was Chad only and they never had sexhe had a fiance according to googleView attachment 1055130
Did he say something based on women?
Kafka was based, become Kafka pilled
When I meet a pretty girl and ask her: Please, come with me!' and she passes me in silence, then what she means is this: 'You are no Duke with a name to conjure with, no powerfully built American Indian with square-shouldered physique, with calm impassive gaze, with skin laved by the air of the prairies and the rivers that irrigate them, you have never been to the great lakes, or sailed on them, wherever they are to be found. So, tell me, why should a pretty girl like me go with you?' 'You forget that no automobile is carrying you swaying through the street in powerful thrusts; I don't seem to see a retinue of gentlemen pressed into livery attending you, murmuring blessings as they follow you in a pedantic semicircle; your breasts are stowed away tidily enough into your corset, but your hips and thighs make up for that parsimony; you are wearing a taffeta dress with plisse pleats of he sort that delighted us last autumn, and - garbed in this menace as you are - still you don't scruple to throw us a smile from time to time.' 'Yes, we are both quite right, and, lest we become irrefutably persuaded of the fact, why don't we now go to our separate homes.Did he say something based on women?
mogs the fuck out of her and this entire forum. were all the foids GigaChad Millionaires only back then?he had a fiance according to googleView attachment 1055130
Get timmy pilled instead, double the blackpill in half the words.
Kafka was based, become Kafka pilled
Holy shit, so relatable.
Kafka was based, become Kafka pilled
Exactly. It’s the perfect book of how a man would get treat on if his low status and undesirable. Like legit how Gregory descend into self deprecation and how his family gradually lost love towards him is perfect represantation of how a man will be treated if they start neeting and such.Dude, it takes one reading of The Metamorphosis to understand not just the experience of being an undesirable joke of a human being, but what would motivate a man to write on it.
Why do normies read kafka? It’s the book for incel and pessimist tbhAnd why do normies care what Kafka did? Is there some new movie or some shit?
But why do normies suddenly care what Kafka was... Like what's the reason of hype.Why do normies read kafka? It’s the book for incel and pessimist tbh
Because normies are cloud chaser. When their YouTuber said this book is good. They will cludchasing to say that they like it too.But why do normies suddenly care what Kafka was... Like what's the reason of hype.
just foids trying to look intellectual, cultured, 'not like other girls', etc.I still don't understand what's so great about kafka, he seems huge in the female sphere for some reason.
no, I refuse to read any of his books btw
brutal. this makes me wanna rope. i hate retards who have it easy. they dont even give credit or be a civil person.Those that paved the way for inventions that enable women to have an easier life & more freedom were in many cases incel or "creepy". The irony is those that helped them the most went extinct & are only recognised for their contributions after they're dust with no living legacy to carry on the potential for more standout achievements.
What do you mean you STILL don't understand if you never even read him in the first place?I still don't understand what's so great about kafka, he seems huge in the female sphere for some reason.
no, I refuse to read any of his books btw
I see him mentioned a lot but can't surmise what the big deal is from context.What do you mean you STILL don't understand if you never even read him in the first place?
I see him mentioned a lot but can't surmise what the big deal is from context.
even if you've never seen a pussy you can still get an idea why men like pussy just from context
there's nothing IRL that disproves the blackpill so you're already wrong there. if kafka's ideas rang true to all these females then they can be seen IRL.It's much like bluepilled normies whose only context of blackpill inceldom is what they're told about it from third-party sources
I won'tIf you don't want to read Kafka, no problem, but piss-poor example you gave here.
I never said there was. I was comparing your rationale to a bluepill normie shying away from a blackpill site based on second-hand "context,"there's nothing IRL that disproves the blackpill so you're already wrong there.
reddit, goodreads and local book club facebook groupsBy the way, who are ALL THESE FOIDS that love "muh Kafka" ?
yeah? how's that stopping me from getting a read on kafka based on context? I can figure out harper lee didn't actually love niggers from online discourse about "To Kill A Mockingbird" and lovecraft was a proto-redditor from all the backtracking he did after his cat named nigger died. how's kafka exempt from this?It's also true that it's not WHAT you say, it's who you are while saying it
yeah? how's that stopping me from getting a read on kafka based on context? I can figure out harper lee didn't actually love niggers from online discourse about "To Kill A Mockingbird" and lovecraft was a proto-redditor from all the backtracking he did after his cat named nigger died. how's kafka exempt from this?
Jews did nothing wrong, most of their males are trapped in a never ending cycle of being born from an ugly mother that gets humped and dumped by random whites, then they end up being incels and can only moneymaxx to try and ascend or buy scorts.
so you're telling me to read Amerika? I'm not falling for it kafkacel, I'll pick The Castle or Amerika if I find them at a book sale but that's itI don't care if you read Kafka or not. But I will say this...
To Kill a Mockingbird is the only thing that Harper Lee ever wrote. So, yes, based on context, you don't need to actually read Harper Lee. Anything and everything anyone says about her writing is based on that one book.
I don't know much about Lovecraft. Lots of people like him, seems he was a proto-science fiction writer. Though I thought most people who liked his crap were geeky men. Not sure. Also not sure if he was a proto-redditor. Could be, I don't know, but maybe you're actually taking things out of context with him.
Kafka is kind of exempt though, and here's why I say this: Kafka didn't write a whole lot, but he had more than just one book. It seems like most normies who "read Kafka" are almost always talking about only one of his works The Metamorphosis (or possibly The Trial). So, in a strange way, they're "Harper Leeing" Kafka. But unlike Harper Lee who really did have only one book, Kafka actually wrote a few novels that hardly anyone seems to pay attention to.
So, if you're trying to understand Kafka based on "context" from what normies say about him, you must realize that you can't approach him the same way you would Harper Lee (who really only had ONE novel).
The Castle and, even better, Amerika, have situations and dialogues that sound like they could have been written by a trucel on these forums. If Kafka wasn't an incel, he clearly knew how the incel mind worked (especially in relation to normies) 100 years before this website even existed. And in all the context I've seen, normies only talk about The Metamorphosis. So, I think you're basing everything you know about Kafka on normies' perception of the only Kafka book they've ever read. Normies will often sidestep that which isn't palatable.
To Kill and Mocking Bird and The Metamorphasis are normie-approved. The two more obscure Kafka novels have situations and dialogue that could have been written by a bluepilled KHHV as he becomes blackpilled.
so you're telling me to read Amerika? I'm not falling for it kafkacel, I'll pick The Castle or Amerika if I find them at a book sale but that's it
yeah you explained well the first time I'm just messing with youNo, man. I'm not telling you to read anything. In fact, I flat out said, "I don't care if you read Kafka or not."
I'm starting to wonder if you actually have trouble with context in the first place. And I'm not saying that to be a jerk. I'm saying that because you're response here really misses the point.
You asked me what makes Kafka exempt from "context." My response is basically that normies side-step the more blackpilled Kafka, don't even acknowledge those works. All your "context" is based on a normie lens. That contextual lens may work fine for Harper Lee, and maybe even Lovecraft. With Kafka, your "context" is myopic, because normies will excise all that additional stuff that I just explained to you, and you wouldn't even know it was there. That's what makes Kafka exempt from your limited normie-sanctioned lens. I was trying to answer your question.
yeah you explained well the first time I'm just messing with you