Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Nobody is actually willing to define what a "good personality" is

The Judge

The Judge

Physical Manifestation of Hate
★★★
Joined
Feb 9, 2025
Posts
728
Over the years, I have observed a common flaw in the logic of our detractors. While they consistently cite a "good personality" as the sole constituent which separates incel from sex-haver, they fail to accurately define just what this entails.

Is it kindness and human decency? Well, apparently not, as I can cite multiple accounts of normies stating that "Being nice is just the bare minimum." which is ironic, considering that a great number of romantically successful fail to cross that threshold...But I digress.

Is it instead, then, based on one's social acumen? Whether or not you're a gregarious, outgoing person who easily connects with others? Well, apparently not, as according to normies, they know a vast number of autistic introverts who have no problem getting into relationships.

Well, what is it, then? What innate quality do we lack that all of these other men have in their possession?

Normies have adamantly refused to provide a clear and concise answer. Keeping it vague like this is a deliberate effort on their part, as it allows them to smugly criticize us without having to delve into the actual reason(s) behind our unfortunate predicament. They can just dismiss any of our perfectly valid concerns about the state of modern dating on the account of us having "Bad personalities."

Seriously, I have yet to see anyone actually try to define this mythical phenomenon and try to explain why someone like Peter Scully was able to get married (And even procreate) or why even some members of this very community end up "ascending" in in spite of holding the exact same beliefs they did beforehand.
 
Last edited:
Normies contradict themselves with every statement they make. Every example goes against what they were trying to say.

They view it entirely based off of their own lives rather then as a collective whole.

So it almost always leads to a cope to justify their miserable existence.
 
Because they're too stupid to realize that personalities don't even exist in the first place. That word is just a misconstrued substitute for how you react to things based off of circumstances, knowledge, and genetically determined instincts.
 
Then it turns out the same foids who say this have only ever dated abusive chads and saw no problem with them
 
Then it turns out the same foids who say this have only ever dated abusive chads and saw no problem with them
And somehow, all of these Chads were master manipulators who flawlessly hid their evil intentions.
 
When redditors talk about a "good personality" they mean "you should believe everything that I believe"
 
"Good personality" = Buzzword with no real meaning
 
Gaslighters are going to gaslight
 
Basically you need to have a taller personality
 
Yes you're right it's mental gymnastics to deny that the problem is structural nothing else. There would be less anger and distress if people were not so full of shit ; it's not that hard to admit that the modern world is tough in many aspects, that not everyone is bound to find love and that men have it harder in the whole love dance stuff. Fucking hell when you think of it it's really very simple.

It must be the man hate, it's so normalized and potent that women and their servants wont give us an inch of credibility.
 
Last edited:
Good personality in reality= good genes. Be it facial, voice, or verbal IQ. If a socially awkward loser tries to have good personality they'd call him a try hard "nice guy"
 
Attractive people have the HALO effect on them which correlates good looking to be nicer or attractive, whereas Unattractive/ugly people have the HORN effect which correlates bad atributes to being unfriendly or hostile.

It's a common trope in a lot of media and fiction where the protagonist is portrayed as being conventionally attractive or goodlooking on the other hand the antagonist is ugly and unattractive.
 
Over the years, I have observed a common flaw in the logic of our detractors. While they consistently cite a "good personality" as the sole constituent which separates incel from sex-haver, they fail to accurately define just what this entails.

Is it kindness and human decency? Well, apparently not, as I can cite multiple accounts of normies stating that "Being nice is just the bare minimum." which is ironic, considering that a great number of romantically successful fail to cross that threshold...But I digress.

Is it instead, then, based on one's social acumen? Whether or not you're a gregarious, outgoing person who easily connects with others? Well, apparently not, as according to normies, they know a vast number of autistic introverts who have no problem getting into relationships.

Well, what is it, then? What innate quality do we lack that all of these other men have in their possession?

Normies have adamantly refused to provide a clear and concise answer. Keeping it vague like this is a deliberate effort on their part, as it allows them to smugly criticize us without having to delve into the actual reason(s) behind our unfortunate predicament. They can just dismiss any of our perfectly valid concerns about the state of modern dating on the account of us having "Bad personalities."

Seriously, I have yet to see anyone actually try to define this mythical phenomenon and try to explain why someone like Peter Scully was able to get married (And even procreate) or why even some members of this very community end up "ascending" in in spite of holding the exact same beliefs they did beforehand.
Good personality=Good looks
iu
 
Good personality in reality= good genes. Be it facial, voice, or verbal IQ. If a socially awkward loser tries to have good personality they'd call him a try hard "nice guy"
This should be obvious to anyone with a functioning brain, and yet normies still try deny it.

Even if personality DID matter, their argument still have no merit; since the first thing someone notices about you when they meet you is your physical appearance. Women will reject you before you even have a chance to do anything.
 
Good personality vs bad personality

 
being above 6'0 seems to be the defining characteristic of a good personality according to foids (not that they'd tell you that tho)
 
Being a scumbag thug bully asshole criminal killer rapist
 
Because they're too stupid to realize that personalities don't even exist in the first place. That word is just a misconstrued substitute for how you react to things based off of circumstances, knowledge, and genetically determined instincts.
 
Judging by the pieces of shit foids throw themselves at, having a "good persоnality" entails being a deceitful, abusive, cheating prick who treats your significant other like shit.
Being a scumbag thug bully asshole criminal killer rapist
Well said.
 
Because anyone with a truly "good character" is being bullied, only those who abandon their conscience can succeed
 

Similar threads

Mr. Agent Clark
Replies
21
Views
637
Allah (Real)
Allah (Real)
SuperKanga.Belgrade
Replies
8
Views
711
curryshit
C
U
Replies
3
Views
338
Sans
Sans
Shay Patrick Cormac
Replies
14
Views
862
Autistic Uggo
Autistic Uggo

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top