Jewtendo announced Pikmin 4 coming 2023 and New Zelda coming in decembar.I don't have a switch hopefuly i can maybe emulate them also soyny direct is in about 7 hours
It's stupid to use the "Jew meme" to make these companies sound like a bad thing and then admit that you want the console to buy and play their games. It defeats the purpose of the meme, you can't insult them if you actually like the services they provide.
I didnt google anything about it, i see this thread and i decide to see the gameplay on youtube, i open new tab and on the frontpage new Zelda gameplay. Talk about spying and mind reading lol.
RETURN TO DREAMLAND REMAKE BABEYYYYY LFGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
The whole business of consoles is to lock-in user.
You want to play Zelda, you buy switch. Nintendo dies not make a lot of money on these. But then you'll buy other games. And Nintendo will take 25% of your money spent there.
So I personally hate consoles, but I've switch cuz Zelda is so good.
And yes, I'm locked-in soy faggot.
is this actually real? can you link the announcement? can't wait to torrent it
I'm sorry but console games aren't that great, the best most immersive games I've ever played have always been PC games. That goes double for the action RPG genre. I don't really care for playing a shooter or a fighter game.
I'm talking about business model. Zelda is a bait, and rest of the games ate the hook.
I'm not talking PC vs consoles. This is just flamewar and as I mentioned I've mixed feelings towards consoles.
But PC aren't saint either: Steam is an attempt to implement same bait and hook scheme.
Yes, and part of PC culture is cracked games, software, emulators (like you mentioned), etc. That's why steam doesn't matter.
I've literally never bought a game in my life, let I've played probably a 100 different games. PC is just superior to console, it's like android VS apple. Apple may be more popular, but that's because of it's elitist culture, PC is superior in performance and features.
That's just flame. Apples vs. oranges. Superior is not quantifiable.
Yeah, its like android vs apple. Pointless argument.
Performance + features != user value
User value != Actual value.
There are people paying $1000 to eat a steak with gold flakes on it lol. The price of the items is probably like $50 to $100 lol.
Don't act like all of a sudden the average human is logical and can accurately rate the value of goods and services. Marketers have been using psychology to manipulate the average person into buying shit way above it's value for decades now.
Last edited:
This is unrelated. My point is fastest cpu and biggest ram is not what most users care about. If you can get your shit running on the hardware that's good enough. But as a user you care about screen quality or battery lifetime.
Gold flaked on the meal is a good with paradoxical demand. Its when product is desirable because its expensive. You won't be able to sell food with aluminium flakes on top. Because the whole point of it I'd to say "I'm do rich I can eat gold yo shit gold". There's no intrinsic value in it. Same goes for luxury items like watches. Rolex is quite bad at telling the time actually. They're good at sending " I can spend $20k on shit I don't really need"
That's literally apple products. Android devices exceed apple in pretty much every aspect of usability, some people even have to buy their chargers separately for their devices lol (that was a meme for a while).
IDK, maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure when it comes to screen quality and battery lifetime, android is either on par with apple or exceeds it.
People literally only buy apple because it's expensive and it's an elitist symbol, it's for showing off that you "have money".
only jew here is you fighting tooth and nail to save your shekels
I used to have iPhone 5s. And I liked it a lot. It was small well built device. Screen was nice too . Usability was nice too (used to be way better than android) . They have very nice integration with ecosystem, so if you buy apple it makes sense to buy only apple.
Then things went south. Screens got bigger and they removed 3.5 mm jack.
I currently have Motorola. iPhone costs around $1k and paying this much for a phone is morally wrong. By default android phones are quite bloated, so I just install LineageOS. But at least jack is still there.
iPhones are not "status symbol" Vertu is. They're actually even cheaper than top Samsung models.
With regard to battery life I was talking about macbooks. They really do outperform most windows machines. They're ARM however so no gamez
.
Yes, they literally are, a lot of women won't even fuck you if you have an android instead of an iPhone (I'm talking about average men, not Chad).
Have you ever watched the FreshandFit podcast?
They've asked women there multiple times if a man using android instead of an iPhone would lead to rejection, and the answer is yes for 90% of them. You don't have to take that anecdote as proof either.
Survey: 76% Single Ladies Prefer Men Who Own iPhone Saying They Look 'Sexier'
Which phone brands are the top choice for dating? Survey shows iPhone has the top spot, but here’s another shocking fact.
www.techtimes.com
Having an iPhone makes you part of the "popular kids" group, highschool never ends, it just becomes more advanced. It's all the same shit.
Over for androidcelsYes, they literally are, a lot of women won't even fuck you if you have an android instead of an iPhone (I'm talking about average men, not Chad).
Have you ever watched the FreshandFit podcast?
They've asked women there multiple times if a man using android instead of an iPhone would lead to rejection, and the answer is yes for 90% of them. You don't have to take that anecdote as proof either.
Survey: 76% Single Ladies Prefer Men Who Own iPhone Saying They Look 'Sexier'
Which phone brands are the top choice for dating? Survey shows iPhone has the top spot, but here’s another shocking fact.
Having an iPhone makes you part of the "popular kids" group, highschool never ends, it just becomes more advanced. It's all the same shit.
Women don't just have picky standards when it comes to looks, they are also picky when it comes to resources, and it's weird how little this is talked about on the forum because so many idiots want to obsess over Chad.
Literally all statistics show that women divorce men primarily for financial reasons, it mostly always comes down to resources. If you have items that indicate wealth, your chances of getting laid go up.
You can say - "Well they aren't attracted to the guy, just his money", but I'd argue someone being attracted to looks is equally as shallow as someone being attracted to resources. At the end of the day no woman is attracted to YOU (as in you "the person" - your personality), so it's ALWAYS shallow.
So you might as well focus on the shallow criteria you can control, rather than wasting years of your life obsessing over the shallow criteria you can't control. It's all shallow.
The biggest lie peddled within the incel community is that a woman being attracted to your body is somehow "moral", "good", or "acceptable", when it's fundamentally no different than her wanting to fuck you because you own a Lamborghini.
Nintendos me.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
