cope he still made the old troon lose it
It's Over Nick Fuentes interview with Piers Morgan ws a disaster from the point of view of appealing to normies. Autistic charm only works on guys like us.
the problem with the right is that they are all histrionic fags in the closet. The problem with the left is that they are all histrionic fags that are open and proud.
I would like to see Nick surrounded by jews jubilee style in a jewry debateI’d still like to see Ben Shapiro and Rabbi Shmuley heeb out debating him
THE ENTIRE POINT IS THAT CLASS IS GAY
thats the thing ,he doesnt. He doesnt want political power. Hes happy just being influencer.
nick wouldnt even deny a single word you typed hereUnfortunately he matters, bunch of braindead zoomers love this retarted fucker.
He’s just another in a long long line of right wing grifter shock jocks. Being dumb and inconsistent is part of the grift. Dumbasses wonder
thats why hes still kind of respectable
idek who cares anymore- its politics, not the end of the world, are we gonna keep rambling on about israel while not doing mass deportations at the same time forever?
Something like a mere 10% of curries in the US are net positive taxpayers. Curries are also known to do shoddy, poor jobs in tech just like they are in all other industries, only receiving preferential treatment in hiring from some firms due to a willingness to accept longer hours and lower wages. They also form racial voting blocs (like all other minorities do) and practice racial nepotism in hiring when put in positions of corporate power.
If “babysitting” isn’t the right word then what is it? There’s nothing that the government or corpos need curries for, there is absolutely no expertise or unique skillset present in curryland that you can’t already find in droves in America. Curries aren’t brought here to “fix a competency crisis,” they’re brought here to undermine the white system
What abt his views do you disagree with? If it’s the Christianity and moralfagging part I can understand that; he’s said some crazy shit like “hating brown people is Jewish”
It's funny how all these anti-immigrant arguments sound just about the same. I have debated against similar arguments made for blacks and latinos (not curries), complete with a bar graph. Here's the problem.
1. Where's this data, that only 10% Indians are net positive tax payers, coming from? It sounds unbelievable on face value in and of itself.
2. Even if it were true, how is the "net" determined here? If you are talking about what they pay in taxes vs what they take in terms of welfare, then you are simply discounting the value they create in the economy by the virtue of their sheer work. Value that becomes profits for their employers and gets taxed, but I'm 100% sure that value or those taxes are not accounted for. Which if they were, would prove that they are not net beneficiaries of the welfare system.
3. Keeping all this aside, do you really like REALLY believe that the neoliberal America's white dominant class are soooo benevolent that they would keep y'all's immigrant assess despite being a net drain on the economy? That's some cool aid only a white nationalist would buy.
Uhhh, and? This is just plain capitalism. The market is willing to accept shoddy products (no matter who is making them.) and the employers WANT to pay lower wages for longer hours (no matter who is receiving them). How is any of this an indictment of any immigrant group and not the dominant system itself.(not that I'm not critical of these absurd claims in their own right)
Is that really a surprise considering people like Nick Fuentes exist? Any "politically neutral" immigrant is in for a rude awakening when his idealistic view comes in contact with the actual reality of racialised America.
Yeah, I'm sure economies are run on pure benevolence and kindness
. Because deference towards Indians is so ingrained in the western psyche .Wonder if all they want to do is give free stuff to Indians then why do they even need immigrants. There's an entire country of one billion eagerly waiting to become a net drain on American economy
Last edited:
M
It honestly wasn't. For boomers and older, maybe gen X and married millennials, sure, but for Zilennials and Zoomers, I think it was a win. And not because of Fuentes, but because of how utterly retarded many of Piers' arguments were. Retard didn't even know what per capita was.
Piers Morgan said "have you ever had sex?" and "you are a misogynist" Hope that foid worshipper gets beheaded
You are the black sheep of the forum in political terms.It's funny how all these anti-immigrant arguments sound just about the same. I have debated against similar arguments made for blacks and latinos (not curries), complete with a bar graph. Here's the problem.
1. Where's this data, that only 10% Indians are net positive tax payers, coming from? It sounds unbelievable on face value in and of itself.
2. Even if it were true, how is the "net" determined here? If you are talking about what they pay in taxes vs what they take in terms of welfare, then you are simply discounting the value they create in the economy by the virtue of their sheer work. Value that becomes profits for their employers and gets taxed, but I'm 100% sure that value or those taxes are not accounted for. Which if they were, would prove that they are not net beneficiaries of the welfare system.
3. Keeping all this aside, do you really like REALLY believe that the neoliberal America's white dominant class are soooo benevolent that they would keep y'all's immigrant assess despite being a net drain on the economy? That's some cool aid only a white nationalist would buy.
Uhhh, and? This is just plain capitalism. The market is willing to accept shoddy products (no matter who is making them.) and the employers WANT to pay lower wages for longer hours (no matter who is receiving them). How is any of this an indictment of any immigrant group and not the dominant system itself.(not that I'm not critical of these absurd claims in their own right)
Is that really a surprise considering people like Nick Fuentes exist? Any "politically neutral" immigrant is in for a rude awakening when his idealistic view comes in contact with the actual reality of racialised America.
Yeah, I'm sure economies are run on pure benevolence and kindness
Nothing I'm saying is particularly revolutionary. And I do admit that these beliefs do not form in a vaccum, people's identities matter and that's true for me as well. There's a reason most latinos and blacks vote democrat.
But the least I desire is for people to actually engage with these ideas on their own sake. Like......prove me wrong.
D
I haven't watched him a lot but from what I've seen I very strongly disagree with his opinions on suicide. I don't care for his emphasis of religion/Christianity either, which seems central to his worldview. I think he places too much emphasis on things like morality and the importance of family (he seems to bring up his relationship with his parents/sister a lot), which are another two things I personally don't care about.
Not an issue with his views themselves, but I also think he comes off as stubborn, hostile and arrogant when arguing his points (why I said he comes off like a schoolchild in some of these clips).
atleast he never takes himself too seriously.
Yup. He also calls himself a radical. His words.
Being called racist by a guy who doesn’t even understand what race means looks bad on the interviewer.
Users who are viewing this thread
