Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over Nick Fuentes interview with Piers Morgan ws a disaster from the point of view of appealing to normies. Autistic charm only works on guys like us.

wereq

wereq

Cursed and Defeated by Fate
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 11, 2022
Posts
48,354
Online time
4d 11h

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_KXvjOJ7YA


This was a colossal disaster that's utterly beyond the comprehension of a purist and autist like Nick Fuentes. Jared Taylor would've been far better here in producing talking points out of issues. Sometimes you need to pad your bricks to appeal to the masses, otherwise journalist vultures will make merry and produce "gotcha" moment after "gotcha" moment with you.
 
He's so desperate to be mainstream now that he's gotten a little taste of it.
 
over for "debate nick bro" copers :feelskek:
 
"JUST DEBATE NICKKKKKKKKKKK BRO"
 
over for "debate nick bro" copers :feelskek:
"JUST DEBATE NICKKKKKKKKKKK BRO"
To be fair, Nick does usually make several solid points but loses his rhetorical discipline along with the softness that is necessary to win over normies. Because he has built himself up upon absolute free speech, he ends up saying outrageous controversial things that only makes sense to us, not realizing that journalists find it easy to trap him with his very own quotes. Overall, he's not a good debater. Too much free speech weakens rhetorical discipline, because if you can say whatever the fuck you want, there's no need to be creative or inventive at word play.
 
To be fair, Nick does usually make several solid points but loses his rhetorical discipline along with the softness that is necessary to win over normies. Because he has built himself up upon absolute free speech, he ends up saying outrageous controversial things that only makes sense to us, not realizing that journalists find it easy to trap him with his very own quotes. Overall, he's not a good debater. Too much free speech weakens rhetorical discipline, because if you can say whatever the fuck you want, there's no need to be creative or inventive at word play.
That's absolutely fair.
 
Nick's response about the Holocaust was really weak.
 
Yet to watch this but it’s still insane to think Nick’s gotten this big. The fact that he’s on Piers Morgan talking abt the Holocaust and white replacement is CRAZY considering just a few years ago streamers like Adin Ross and FreshnFit went under massive scrutiny for platforming him.

There might actually be hope for whites if the overton window keeps shifting right. I hope there’s a chance for Asians (mainly Japs & South Koreans) to take back their countries as well
 
There might actually be hope for whites if the overton window keeps shifting right. I hope there’s a chance for Asians (mainly Japs & South Koreans) to take back their countries as well
The problem with the far-right is that they don't govern well. They are good at generating outrage, but not good at developing long term policy that will produce the results that they want.
 
To be fair, Nick does usually make several solid points but loses his rhetorical discipline along with the softness that is necessary to win over normies. Because he has built himself up upon absolute free speech, he ends up saying outrageous controversial things that only makes sense to us, not realizing that journalists find it easy to trap him with his very own quotes. Overall, he's not a good debater. Too much free speech weakens rhetorical discipline, because if you can say whatever the fuck you want, there's no need to be creative or inventive at word play.
He doesn't need to care. He's built on controversies and his specialization is being edgy and controversial.

Even if he wanted to backpedal that's too late
 
I hope there’s a chance for Asians (mainly Japs & South Koreans) to take back their countries as well
japs still mostly have their country, its nowhere near as bad as in europe. Regarding SK i think the biggest problem is the gender relations and birthrates.
 
The problem with the far-right is that they don't govern well. They are good at generating outrage, but not good at developing long term policy that will produce the results that they want.
What’s termed “far right” in European countries is mainstream conservatism in America. There hasn’t been a true far right politician in the West in decades
 
Nick's response about the Holocaust was really weak.
Leftists over better arguments here. I was listening to this leftist woman and she said that the Holocaust was been used as a platform by the ADL to promote the idea that Jewish rights are above other people's rights and that everyone deserves equal rights. That kind of appeal for equal rights is a more effective argument than the villain angle Nick Fuentes puts worth.
 
What’s termed “far right” in European countries is mainstream conservatism in America. There hasn’t been a true far right politician in the West in decades
The furthest right that exists today also can't govern. They are not good at policy.
 
He doesn't need to care. He's built on controversies and his specialization is being edgy and controversial.
He needs to care if he wants majority of society to accept his views.
 
He's essentially trying to portray himself in a manner that's 'palatable' to normies. Of course, this involves killing his actual political message in the first place.
 
a mexican, potato, spaghetti, white supremacist
 
He's essentially trying to portray himself in a manner that's 'palatable' to normies.
No way! :lul::lul::lul: He fundamentally lacks the ability to read the room.
 
Too much free speech weakens rhetorical discipline, because if you can say whatever the fuck you want, there's no need to be creative or inventive at word play.
This is why debates are a waste of time.

The part about race shootings and Jew talk is why all political debate is pointless under any form of censorship. This is just bullshit on both sides that can't say what we all know. The difference is Piers is pedantically attempting to gotcha Nick and Nick is trying to balance being a sarcastic jackass only going as far as the Powers That Be allow which appeals to his "high IQ" base while somewhat catering to normies and boomers watching this, and I think he's failing at that as he's just irritable.
 
I don't agree the people who hate nick would still hate nick if he didn't say such controversial things. People are fed up, he should take full advantage of it and go full loose but not incriminating
 
The Jew / Hitler stuff was great
 
He's essentially trying to portray himself in a manner that's 'palatable' to normies. Of course, this involves killing his actual political message in the first place.
Nobody gives a fuck about politics. It's all about the fundamentals wants of the people. Nobody voted for trump because they thought he had good policy but because he mogged everyone else on the podium stage
 
This is why debates are a waste of time.

The part about race shootings and Jew talk is why all political debate is pointless under any form of censorship. This is just bullshit on both sides that can't say what we all know. The difference is Piers is pedantically attempting to gotcha Nick and Nick is trying to balance being a sarcastic jackass only going as far as the Powers That Be allow which appeals to his "high IQ" base while somewhat catering to normies and boomers watching this, and I think he's failing at that as he's just irritable.
They are also seemingly responding to different data sets.
 
A more refined, empathetic version of jared taylor is what the race realist camp needs in america. I am not white nor american, but this movement lacks class in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
A more refined, empathtic version of jared taylor is what the race realist camp needs in america. I am not white nor american, but this movement lacks class in my opinion.
:yes: :yes: :yes:
 
It's a sad commentary that someone like Fuentes is getting a platform at all.
 
They are also seemingly responding to different data sets.
Piers playing dumb about what "per capita" is. Waste of time.
 
It's a sad commentary that someone like Fuentes is getting a platform at all.
Sad cause seething pajeets like you are now facing the reality that whites and Asians don’t want us anymore. Maybe you should be sad that we fundamentally lack the ability to build or create any worthwhile nations on our own, instead of whining that better races don’t want to babysit us
 
Maybe you should be sad that we fundamentally lack the ability to build or create any worthwhile nations on our own, instead of whining that better races don’t want to babysit us
:yes: :yes: :yes:
 
Why are we still pretending this Mexican faggot is of any importance, fucker can't even hold a consistent ideology and flip-flops constantly
 
Sad cause seething pajeets like you are now facing the reality that whites and Asians don’t want us anymore. Maybe you should be sad that we fundamentally lack the ability to build or create any worthwhile nations on our own, instead of whining that better races don’t want to babysit us
Usually I would attribute this hilarious diatribe to a sick mind with a completely twisted and unrealistic view of reality. Maybe education on how the world really works could solve this. But that's not my burden. Plus after the curryfool episode I'm done trying to reason with people who project their own failures as a human being onto an entire race (if such a diverse group of people can even be called a "race")
 
Usually I would attribute this hilarious diatribe to a sick mind with a completely twisted and unrealistic view of reality. Maybe education on how the world really works could solve this. But that's not my burden.
You’re the one who thinks the rest of the world owes pajeets living space and gibs just for existing. Simmer down.
Plus after the curryfool episode I'm done trying to reason with people who project their own failures as a human being onto an entire race (if such a diverse group of people can even be called a "race")
Yeah total projection right? Not like curry shitholes are the dirtiest and poorest countries on Earth per capita, and pajeets only made it this far into history by arranged marriages at every social strata, literally cheating natural selection. Mind telling me where the pajeet accomplishments are in the Olympics btw? Or literally any contact sports?

Pajeets have shit genetics on average and that’s just that. And you cope with “SAAR WE WUJ DIVURSE” :feelstastyman: meanwhile South Asians still form a coherent genetic cluster on PCA and trace back to the same three ancient populations, our “diversity” falling along a mere ANI-ASI gradient.

Considering your soy delusion regarding genetic determinism and the racepill + the fact you’ve LITERALLY downplayed the dating blackpill elsewhere (and unironically claimed you’re an incel because of “personality”), I have to wonder what the hell whoever decided to make you a mod was high on
 
Last edited:
You’re the one who thinks the rest of the world owes pajeets gibs just for existing. Simmer down retard.
Quite ironic that this assessment comes from someone who presumably lives in the US. Inviting the assumption that his dad or himself or both must be working there, the contingency without which this state wouldn't exist(I.e. you'd be kicked out). Which leads to this unfortunate interpretation of the work of your father , as that of an attempt on the part of the system that employes him to "babysit" you guys.

Exactly the kind of disconnect from reality I was referring to.

Considering your soy delusion regarding genetic determinism and the racepill + the fact you’ve LITERALLY downplayed the dating blackpill elsewhere (and unironically claimed you’re an incel because of “personality”), I have to wonder what the hell whoever decided to make you a mod was high on
None of these views are all that uncommon. I don't know what is this about the dating blackpill , but you are probably right about it because, like, holy hell someone has been keeping track.
Yeah total projection right? Not like curry shitholes are the dirtiest and poorest countries on Earth per capita, and pajeets only made it this far into history by arranged marriages at every social strata, literally cheating natural selection. Mind telling me where the pajeet accomplishments are in the Olympics btw? Or literally any contact sports?

Pajeets have shit genetics on average and that’s just that. And you cope with “SAAR WE WUJ DIVURSE” :feelstastyman: meanwhile South Asians still form a coherent genetic cluster on PCA and trace back to the same three ancient populations, our “diversity” falling along a mere ANI-ASI gradient.
just lol
 
Last edited:
i don't know if it's that bad, but i am still listening.

nick fuentes has some trouble defending his edgier comments, while piers morgan sounds like a fossil that is completely out of touch.
 
Why are we still pretending this Mexican faggot is of any importance, fucker can't even hold a consistent ideology and flip-flops constantly

Unfortunately he matters, bunch of braindead zoomers love this retarted fucker.

He’s just another in a long long line of right wing grifter shock jocks. Being dumb and inconsistent is part of the grift. Dumbasses wonder :feelstastyman:OMG what’s he’s going to say next :feelstastyman:
 
I'm surprised someone even remembers
Badgame curryfool gif
 
He's a sandnigger but I like his demeanor. If he wants to become bigger, he shouldn't change a single thing he does. I can see his views becoming mainstream within the next decade.
 
I don't like Nick's views for the most part but he's got a comfy little setup and is charismatic. He's kind of enjoyable to watch for that reason ngl.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →