The exception to the rule doesn't make the rule, your anecdotal stories don't function as proof against statistical facts. We don't even know if he's betabuxxing, we don't know any of the other important factors.
The first thing a woman will notice is a man's height, because your height determines where your face is located to begin with lol.
It's the difference between her:
1. Looking down at you (worse case scenario).
2. Looking straight forward to see you (average scenario).
3. Looking up to you (best case scenario).
Either one of these three happen before she even see's your face and rates it subconsciously, and if she has to look up to see your face you automatically get some points added to your rating.
The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...
incels.wiki
Their findings demonstrated the cutoffs at which women consider a man too short or too tall:
- 90% of women will reject a man who is 5'4" based solely on his height.
- 65% of women will reject a man who is 5'7" based solely on his height.
- 50% of women will reject a man who is 5'8" based solely on his height.
- 14% of women will reject a man who is 5'10" based solely on his height.
- 1.5% of women will reject a man who is 6' based solely on his height.
- Past 6'2", women begin to increase rejections of men for being too tall.
- 30% of women believe there is no such thing as a man being "too tall."
- Over 94% of women will reject a man solely for him being too short.
The show how important height is, 50% of women will reject a man who is 5'8", and 5'8" is the average height of a US male. So being average means you will be rejected
BY HALF OF ALL WOMEN .
You'd be fucking lying if you said 50% of women will reject men for having average faces, no they don't, they can "work with" an average face, but height is always the "deal breaker".