L
Always a funny moment when you read the comments that cuckolds/feminists give to his arrest, they wish the typical stuff onto him like rape/murder in prison. The best thing: Most of them are liberals who oppose the death penalty, when little Tyrone/Pablo Jr. killed an old lady to finance his drug addiction they would cry for him when the judge would sentence him to death. Especially when it comes to murder and delicts with drugs/money they write those extremely apologetic and really heartbreaking letters because there they have sympathy for him, when someone wants to fry them for it they accuse that person of being bloodthirsty and vengeful, then they spit the relatives of the victims in the face when they want justice for their loved ones - they even defend serial killers with ridiculous arguments like "He couldn't count to ten, he was a good boy deep in his heart!" among other shit. Bleeding hearts for murderers/drug dealers/other criminal scum while completely losing one's mind when a sex crime happens - a typical normalfag trait in the West.
As soon as their own subjective threshold gets crossed they turn into bloodthirsty and rabid animals that wish the worst things upon another human being. But the thing is: They are cowards. They don't want to have responsibility of condemning a man to death - even if this man is a pedophile/hebephile (the most evil thing you can be according to them). They even sent the police after Larson after he tried to commit suicide so that he could be palliatively kept alive, that sheer cynicism. So when the law and a qualified judge condemns a man to death thereby taking direct responsibility they detest it, but at the same time they fetishize prison violence/rape as a form of karmic justice thereby leaving the judgement to people like methheads, gangbangers, skinheads and drug dealers who are in an absolutely no position to judge others due to having a broken moral code themselves and being criminal scum often far worse than the offenders they look down upon, they have no authority to judge anyone, no qualifications to determine who is guilty and who is not and aren't held accountable in the same manner as qualified personnel by standards/procedures. The reason why they like "vigilante justice": It's comfortable, because then they don't have to take responsibility and can leave the judgement to an outsider and thereby nobody in regular so(y)ciety gets his hands dirty.
We live in a so(y)ciety where murderers are seen as better than sex criminals by the general public and by the justice system. A murderer will leave prison after ~16,5 years on average, afterwards there is no registration for him, a sex criminal will forever be taken into a registry and will have no opportunity to reintegrate into so(y)ciety even when he is fully reformed. The victim of the murderer won't become alive again after these years, while a victim of a sexual offense can recover and see his/her family again. So(y)ciety thinks of sex criminals as horrendous scum while painting murderers or drug dealers as mere victims of circumstances that would have been perfect innocent angels under other circumstances while denying the struggles that many sex criminals have with their own sexuality/demons. A person who commits an act for nothing more than greed is seen as better as someone who fought with demons for his entire life (most paraphilias like pedophilia are something you are born with) and then lost the battle after years of mental decay, although with the most common definition of "evil" (causing unnecessary suffering due to your own voilition and by your own free will) the drug dealer/murderer would be far more evil because the entire nature of the sex criminal compells him to commit his crimes which restricts his freedom of choice/will while the drug dealer/murderer most of the time does it for financial profit/gain without ever feeling that intrinsic force, these offenders have a greater variety of options but still chooses the wrong one thereby deliberately choosing "evil". So even with the guilt-based punishments that liberals argue for a sex criminal should receive less of a punishment due to having a limited choice of options/ability to judge from the start. So suddenly their argument for high penalties against them becomes one of deterrent effects for other potential offenders (something in the justice system that they normally oppose when it comes to all other forms of criminality). Some of them even argue against the concept of prisons/police as a whole but as soon as sex crimes come into play they literally argue for a police state.
The most cynic part comes when you see how they wish rape on sex criminals - most of them have already been abused and it didn't make them better/more sympathetic towards their later victims (jfl), they most of the time know both sides of the coin. And on one hand sexual assault is the most evil thing (even far worse than torture murders), but when it happens to men (especially prisoners who cannot defend themselves) it's suddenly very funny and a joke.
As soon as their own subjective threshold gets crossed they turn into bloodthirsty and rabid animals that wish the worst things upon another human being. But the thing is: They are cowards. They don't want to have responsibility of condemning a man to death - even if this man is a pedophile/hebephile (the most evil thing you can be according to them). They even sent the police after Larson after he tried to commit suicide so that he could be palliatively kept alive, that sheer cynicism. So when the law and a qualified judge condemns a man to death thereby taking direct responsibility they detest it, but at the same time they fetishize prison violence/rape as a form of karmic justice thereby leaving the judgement to people like methheads, gangbangers, skinheads and drug dealers who are in an absolutely no position to judge others due to having a broken moral code themselves and being criminal scum often far worse than the offenders they look down upon, they have no authority to judge anyone, no qualifications to determine who is guilty and who is not and aren't held accountable in the same manner as qualified personnel by standards/procedures. The reason why they like "vigilante justice": It's comfortable, because then they don't have to take responsibility and can leave the judgement to an outsider and thereby nobody in regular so(y)ciety gets his hands dirty.
We live in a so(y)ciety where murderers are seen as better than sex criminals by the general public and by the justice system. A murderer will leave prison after ~16,5 years on average, afterwards there is no registration for him, a sex criminal will forever be taken into a registry and will have no opportunity to reintegrate into so(y)ciety even when he is fully reformed. The victim of the murderer won't become alive again after these years, while a victim of a sexual offense can recover and see his/her family again. So(y)ciety thinks of sex criminals as horrendous scum while painting murderers or drug dealers as mere victims of circumstances that would have been perfect innocent angels under other circumstances while denying the struggles that many sex criminals have with their own sexuality/demons. A person who commits an act for nothing more than greed is seen as better as someone who fought with demons for his entire life (most paraphilias like pedophilia are something you are born with) and then lost the battle after years of mental decay, although with the most common definition of "evil" (causing unnecessary suffering due to your own voilition and by your own free will) the drug dealer/murderer would be far more evil because the entire nature of the sex criminal compells him to commit his crimes which restricts his freedom of choice/will while the drug dealer/murderer most of the time does it for financial profit/gain without ever feeling that intrinsic force, these offenders have a greater variety of options but still chooses the wrong one thereby deliberately choosing "evil". So even with the guilt-based punishments that liberals argue for a sex criminal should receive less of a punishment due to having a limited choice of options/ability to judge from the start. So suddenly their argument for high penalties against them becomes one of deterrent effects for other potential offenders (something in the justice system that they normally oppose when it comes to all other forms of criminality). Some of them even argue against the concept of prisons/police as a whole but as soon as sex crimes come into play they literally argue for a police state.
The most cynic part comes when you see how they wish rape on sex criminals - most of them have already been abused and it didn't make them better/more sympathetic towards their later victims (jfl), they most of the time know both sides of the coin. And on one hand sexual assault is the most evil thing (even far worse than torture murders), but when it happens to men (especially prisoners who cannot defend themselves) it's suddenly very funny and a joke.
Am personally in favor of zero tolerance policies on crime as a whole, in favor of the death penalty and believe in the validity of punitive justice, in my opinion the sentencing should always be seen as a deterrent for criminals in spe, but the judgement should always be in the hands of qualified authorities that can be held accountable for making mistakes, vigilante justice is a cancer from America that should under no circumstances get any sympathy - especially when criminal scum deals out the punishment that is in no position to judge others. One is often called the worst names for holding these views in a debate by these people that then want blood as soon as their own subjective moral treshold gets crossed. They believe in restorative justice, but as soon as something becomes too bad for them they want blood. The American view on justice nowadays is deeply disgusting and hypocritical - especially the one of liberals, because it's not coherent in the slightest. They accuse others of being too emotional or wanting vengeance when a murder occurs, but when a sex crime occurs they want to ommit any legal process and hang him right away, then it's suddenly not "Innocent until proven guilty" but rather "Guilty until proven innocent and then still guilty because I already made up my mind about this guy". Everything of it is tiring. Have nothing to do with Larson, but he is an excellent case study for the phenomenons described above.
Last edited:
