Serious My Youtube Ban only adds more fuel to the fire

[Justanotherbloke]

They genuinly think censorship pacifies the public. That deleting videos somehow makes the truth disappear. It doesn't. It confirms everything we say about which parasites control the narrative and who you're never allowed to criticize.
Wrong ideas = exile. And here’s the real kicker cause every ban, every shadowban, every algorithmic burial only adds more fuel to the fire. You don’t erase conviction by silencing people but you intensify it.

Well done Youtube. You have intensified my anger, intensified my hatred for Jews Even more, strengthened the narrative that Jews run the show even more. You have taken away something valuable from me. 11 hour bootcamps in my playlist, Tax advice video's for my additional stream of income, seminars and whatnot. 8 months of building my channel, something that adds value to my life and was an asset

These platforms think they’re breaking us. They’re not. They're radicalizing more people than any manifesto ever could.

 

[Justanotherbloke]

And then of course they cry about why some random guy goes crazy, and lights up a mall.
Play victim, act as if they're holier than thou while being used as guardian angels of those fucking Jews

 

[gluttony]

YouTube is a private company, they have no obligation to allow free speech unlike say your government would.

It's better to just make your own service or find something else that allows it, alternative media exist for a reason.

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

And then of course they cry about why some random guy goes crazy, and lights up a mall.
Play victim, act as if they're holier than thou while being used as guardian angels of those fucking Jews

271k wasn't enough. TKD right fucking now.

 

[Justanotherbloke]

YouTube is a private company, they have no obligation to allow free speech unlike say your government would.

It's better to just make your own service or find something else that allows it.

I am pissed off literally my blood is boiling. How can the general public accept this? And then they don't even give you a solid reason why they banned you which is what I am able to use against them in the DSA complaint with a few other articles I'll use cause I'm wrongfully banned. I have never mentioned specific individuals only said 'the great noticing has begun' they contradict their own policy 2x in my case

 

[Diddlium]

YouTube is a private company, they have no obligation to allow free speech unlike say your government would.

It's better to just make your own service or find something else that allows it, alternative media exist for a reason.

People keep saying this but its wrong. Youtube is NOT a private company. It's owned by Google, which is publicly owned. You can literally purchase shares and stock in Google

 

[leviathan9999]

what is your channel?

 

[gluttony]

People keep saying this but its wrong. Youtube is NOT a private company. It's owned by Google, which is publicly owned. You can literally purchase shares and stock in Google

so they have obligations to keep things advertiser friendly or risk losing them and their shareholders.

 

[Justanotherbloke]

what is your channel?

It was my own personal channel with entire playlists full of valuable video's, I was not even uploading. I used it daily. So now you see how far they take it.
1 vague comment = permanently banned

I can't create new channels either, otherwise I would have done that and not be uploading 2 threads about pouring my heart and hatred out

 

[Diddlium]

so they have obligations to keep things advertiser friendly or risk losing them.

Well technically since they're a public company, they're more so obligated to provide for the public and their demands. It's just that those demands are catered to the highest bidder. In this case the advertisers. But technically speaking, as crazy as it sounds, we could all pool our money together, buy massive shares in Google and demand changes to fit our demands

 

[gluttony]

Well technically since they're a public company, they're more so obligated to provide for the public and their demands. It's just that those demands are catered to the highest bidder. In this case the advertisers. But technically speaking, as crazy as it sounds, we could all pool our money together, buy massive shares in Google and demand changes to fit our demands

Yeah but a lot more of those larger corporations have people with deeper pockets than us investing into them, unless you get like a sizeable portion of the world's population

 

[Diddlium]

Yeah but a lot more of those larger corporations have people with deeper pockets than us investing into them, unless you get like a sizeable portion of the world's population

I wasn't suggesting we do it, i was just entertaining a hypothetical of what could be possible

 

[Justanotherbloke]

Well technically since they're a public company, they're more so obligated to provide for the public and their demands. It's just that those demands are catered to the highest bidder. In this case the advertisers. But technically speaking, as crazy as it sounds, we could all pool our money together, buy massive shares in Google and demand changes to fit our demands

In theory yes shareholders influence policy. But that assumes the system is open to real influence. It’s not.
The idea of pooling money to out-leverage trillion dollar asset managers like BlackRock or Vanguard is pure fantasy cause these entities don’t just own shares, they shape policy, culture, and perception at a meta level.
Google doesn’t serve the public. It serves an ideology, one enforced through financial pressure, regulatory capture, and narrative control. Advertisers aren’t just the highest bidders. They're gatekeepers of acceptable opinion.
So no, you won’t buy your way into changing this machine. It doesn’t respond to pressure from below but only directives from above. And those directives are already spoken for.

 

[gluttony]

I wasn't suggesting we do it, i was just entertaining a hypothetical of what could be possible

hmmm

 

[Diddlium]

It was my own personal channel with entire playlists full of valuable video's, I was not even uploading. I used it daily. So now you see how far they take it.
1 vague comment = permanently banned

I can't create new channels either, otherwise I would have done that and not be uploading 2 threads about pouring my heart and hatred out

I really struggle to know how thats possible. I've had my account since I was 16, my spicy comments (all of em) always get autoremoved by the TalmudAI

Can't you just go to a nearby location at your home, log in the wifi there and just make a new account?

 

[Justanotherbloke]

I really struggle to know how thats possible. I've had my account since I was 16, my spicy comments (all of em) always get autoremoved by the TalmudAI

Can't you just go to a nearby location at your home, log in the wifi there and just make a new account?

They slapped 'circumvention' onto my case where the vague comment may have triggered the automated system, but according to their own policy, channels created after the termination of the account in question count as circumvention.
All channels tied to me were created before.

 

[Diddlium]

In theory yes shareholders influence policy. But that assumes the system is open to real influence. It’s not.
The idea of pooling money to out-leverage trillion dollar asset managers like BlackRock or Vanguard is pure fantasy cause these entities don’t just own shares, they shape policy, culture, and perception at a meta level.
Google doesn’t serve the public. It serves an ideology, one enforced through financial pressure, regulatory capture, and narrative control. Advertisers aren’t just the highest bidders. They're gatekeepers of acceptable opinion.
So no, you won’t buy your way into changing this machine. It doesn’t respond to pressure from below but only directives from above. And those directives are already spoken for.

I've said this before: internet ad space is the most valuable entity in the universe at the moment. More so than gold or crude oil. It has the power to dictate what people see, the news they get and the entertainment they enjoy as well as shape their worldview

 

[Justanotherbloke]

I've said this before: internet ad space is the most valuable entity in the universe at the moment. More so than gold or crude oil. It has the power to dictate what people see, the news they get and the entertainment they enjoy as well as shape their worldview

All at cost of normal everyday guys trying to carve their own path, get by in life and do their own thing / minding their own business. I see those mainstream platforms as frat parties. You don't think like us? Cool, we'll bully you and guide you to the exit

 

[nakolas]

I hate censorship fags

 

[Diddlium]

All at cost of normal everyday guys trying to carve their own path, get by in life and do their own thing / minding their own business.

Compare the internet 2 decades ago to now. What was once a huge selection of communities, websites, platforms and blogs with their own unique touch became 4 major websites everyone congregates on. I still remember when Dailymotion was great and would watch softcore porn as a teenager. They were at one point the biggest competitor to Youtube. Then they decided to move away from user created content hosting and gave the monopoly to Jewtube. Sad times

 

[Justanotherbloke]

Compare the internet 2 decades ago to now. What was once a huge selection of communities, websites, platforms and blogs with their own unique touch became 4 major websites everyone congregates on. I still remember when Dailymotion was great and would watch softcore porn as a teenager. They were at one point the biggest competitor to Youtube. Then they decided to move away from user created content hosting and gave the monopoly to Jewtube. Sad times

The golden era for me was around 2011/2012.
It's now used as a psychological weapon for control of narrative. I think they'll only increase pressure exponentially from now on. Decades ago figures like David Irving were deplatformed, by 2035 it will be guys like Sayed Mohammad Marandi, Macgregor anyone else who disagrees with Israeli hegemony and US foreign intervention policy for the sake of serving israel

 

[gluttony]

the internet has fallen billions must Tormaxx