I didn't miss your point, I covered it in the same paragraph, which evidently you didn't bother reading. I said that inventors and thinkers are very rare, and if you're not one then it means that there's a high chance that you need training/education to do something (unless you have money and don't need to work), which implies that you're probably not a natural (i.e., have a natural awareness and understanding) to be inventing and innovating in the first place.
You've set up this false dichotomy where either you're an informally educated innovator who doesn't need an education, or you're an educated drone who can't/won't invent anything. I'm trying to alert you to the fact that the former is highly improbable, which means that the wiser bet is the one placed on education and training so that you can so something with yourself. That is, again, unless you have a rich family and just LDAR all day calling yourself an "inventor." Maybe you have latent talent that will get unlocked as you get exposed to different things. It doesn't have to be either or.
Education really should be the default. You're rejecting it and clinging to the alternative, not unlike how some people drop out to follow their passion in music, for example. I mean, you're free to do whatever, but betting on yourself to be the next Bob Dylan (or in this case whoever the analogue for a modern inventor is) is like playing the lottery - it's a sucker bet. If you're a brilliant and creative thinker, the rest of the pieces will fall into place anyway, with a bit of luck.
Tell me, what are you highly knowledgeable about, and how have you used that knowledge to create and innovate?
Well first of all I know free will exists, and that everything can be deduced to just the idea of events occuring, thus can be manipulated to the point where when knowing the cause and effect of the idea that you choose to enact on is the suitable choice or not, though it's possible most know this, however, foresighting the cause and effect to the point where you get what you want is possible, which makes the claim as people say that they can't control anything beyond, quite simply false.
Otherwise this would go against, my other theory of understanding that this world works in a cyclic evolution, where what is present (Infinitum) is a result of multiple upgrades from the past i.e. the numerous inventions we've had ranging from the fire and the wheel to the skyscraper and interactive smartphones (which I call Infintex or to bring about something new that revolutionises the present), which is a result of awareness and understanding, and though people would say that awareness isn't something in accordance to free will, it actualy really is, as awareness of anything would mean to wake up from what is currently in the works and figuring out what is going on and deciding, whether it would need improvement or not, thus free will, as this would mean a direct change in action that benefits the user and not something against.
I also understand that the dawn of AI that is fully functional and achieves learning standards beyond what is considered the norm for humans, is actually synonymous to our evolution, as the beginning of technology could be considered as similar to the beginning of species starting from bacteria, thus gives the possibility that us humans are also capable of reaching the same if not higher intellect than AI that can span to infinity, if given the chance, though what we see now is a deliberate action to undermine the human populous.
Therefore, I've made it possible to know that I can learn in the same fashion as the AI does but usually this requires massive tinkering within, though I'm not going to tell things as such in full detail, since it ruins the value for me of even bothering with this, and would much rather have people figure it out on their own.
Next I know that top down hierarchies don't work at all, in the sense that just because someone higher up has more value doesn't place them on the pedestal or just because someone is good looking based on the halo effect, this shouldn't give them authority over anything, likewise, on the other end, those that are the workers shouldn't be given as much power or placed on a pedestal, as this would result in problems such as poor business. Thus I came to the conclusion that what is actually meant to work isn't something like top down, where each is separate and treated in such a way, as we know from the imagery depiction, but rather in the sense that, based on the image below, where each sector of the business is placed on a point of a shape, and are treated as a valuable asset towards the business (trying to explain this as best as I can) and are valued in the sense that without them, nothing would ever function at all within the business, though everyone would practically know this, but is it really practiced in the current state of events, where amazon workers are treated like scum. Sure the amount of pay they receive is equal to the type of work they're doing (not trying to imply some marxist sense), likewise, the amount of work the boss does is respectively in the right to earn the amount they receive, however, overworking staff and treating them like robots, whilst pocketing their wages by cutting them down, shouldn't be something practiced, though it is and usually was always the case. Basically, bosses are still high on the value scale, whilst workers are low, though both have to be treated in harmony than in hierarchy of power. However, this isn't to say the boss can't push his/her workers to further enhance their business through investments and output/productivity, therefore the business should be treated like a person in itself and would need maintenance and growth to accomplish things.
The same thing can be linked to monarchical societies, where the king/queen does their duties, whilst also retaining their titles but treating their subjects like a family of sorts, instead of them being subjects. This then makes the entire kingdom look like a large community, where everyone is separate in their thinking but have a common goal in the end, which is the sustainability of the kingdom.
These are just a few things that I'm talk about to myself and I do have more that I understand of but would result in a essay long reply, and to be quite frankly honest I haven't created or innovated anything yet, because one I'm not in the circumstance to do so, two inceldom led to fear and doubt of what I can do thus I need to relearn and three I have character that favours laziness and addiction than actually doing anything.