Theory My theory why man have different sizes, dickpill!

[AdolfRizzler]

@LastGerman

My theory is that in this history since foids reproduced with man that had some kind of genetic traits that made sure that the human race can survive, like height to fight natural predators or good eye area to view the enemy, traits that allowed the protection of the human race or to gather food, the penis size wasn t so important to them at that period of time, they cared more to find food to not die, but since dick size wasn t really a big factor that contributed to the human race survival, it wasn t in the first plan, so this trait of small cocks never disappered, and since foids never in the entire history never had the sexual choice who to reproduce with, ofc all males with a small cock reproduced via rape or forced impregnation!



now in 2025 when food is on every table, sex happens daily and sex is everything a foid cares about now, so the food/shelter/protection stops to matter, the cock size is the evolution trait that should have happened billions and billions of years ago, back then there were no evolutionary pressure for uniformity, unlike some traits that were modelled by the natural selection to be more uniformal, the cock size wasn t a critical factor for survival or reproduction which allowed variations of different cock sizes to be!



just like how in some animals (the horn size) are strictly modelated by the sexual/natural selection because it gives an advantage for survival/reproduction, but it the case for the humans, there aren t proofs that small cocks can t reproduce with a foid, so there isn t an natural selection that would bring the small cock to extinction because it would make the survival/reproduction harder



Why wasn t the uniformity necesarly during the history:

1.functionality: it was used only for the transfer of the sperm to the ovul, as long this function was done, it s size never had an major impact on the reproduction of the species, in what period of time foids were able to have sex daily without making kids?


2.sexual selection: unlike other species where the cock size has key role to attract the partener, it seems that for humans there were also other factors that played here (food, money, shelter, face, height, fame etc), so what happens in 2025 is sexual selection, foids choose the best traits for reproduction height/chad face, but since the other factors that mattered since all foids in 2025 has a shelter/food/ makes more money than man, it seems that it only remained the only factor that matters during the sexual pleasure, the cock size or it might be seen in a foid s brain as something that is something more fit for the survival/ successful reproduction of the species since if there would be no sexual pleasure, everybody would stop reproducing, which can bring the extinction, so the better is the sexual pleasure the more certain a species survives since everybody would want to reproduce even more


3.the lack of the physical constraints: unlike other organs, heart etc, the penis can vary in size since the vagina can expand for a bigger size, otherwise the survival of the species wouldn t be so great

 

[aryanmikmaq]

So this is why I am a dickcel

 

[LastGerman]

My theory is that in this history since foids reproduced with man that had some kind of genetic traits that made sure that the human race can survive, like height to fight natural predators or good eye area to view the enemy, traits that allowed the protection of the human race or to gather food, the penis size wasn t so important to them at that period of time, they cared more to find food to not die, but since dick size wasn t really a big factor that contributed to the human race survival, it wasn t in the first plan, so this trait of small cocks never disappered, and since foids never in the entire history never had the sexual choice who to reproduce with, ofc all males with a small cock reproduced via rape or forced impregnation!

Let us assume, this is true. The questio nstill remains to why big pensies exist in the first place? How and why did big pensies come into existence in the first place? What is the mechanism behind of that? How did it come into existence if it was not there before? Or was it there before? But if it was there before, then why do small pensies exist? The same quesition also applies here.

now in 2025 when food is on every table, sex happens daily and sex is everything a foid cares about now

Coitus happens daily only for females and for a specific group of men.

sex happens daily and sex is everything a foid cares about now

It is all about coitus.

so the food/shelter/protection stops to matter, the cock size is the evolution trait that should have happened billions and billions of years ago, back then there were no evolutionary pressure for uniformity, unlike some traits that were modelled by the natural selection to be more uniformal, the cock size wasn t a critical factor for survival or reproduction which allowed variations of different cock sizes to be!

Why was not there uniformity in the first place? Why is there uniformity in animals. For example male donkeys. They all have big penises. They have an unviersal penis size that is big. Variation is contraproductive to evolution. It is so bad, that variations dies out. There is also a good German documentary about evolution, that also points this out. For exmaple, random mutations do not survive. Variations does not survive. Any variation is a deviation from the natural state.

just like how in some animals (the horn size) are strictly modelated by the sexual/natural selection because it gives an advantage for survival/reproduction, but it the case for the humans, there aren t proofs that small cocks can t reproduce with a foid, so there isn t an natural selection that would bring the small cock to extinction because it would make the survival/reproduction harder

It is impossible to have coitus with a small penis. Therefore small penises should not even exist.

1.functionality: it was used only for the transfer of the sperm to the ovul, as long this function was done, it s size never had an major impact on the reproduction of the species

Then again. How and why do big pensies exist in the first palce? Where are they coming from? How did it come into existence? Bigger is always better. I also made a thread about this:

"Who says size doesn't matter" - Heretic - Size determines fate

This thread contains some spoilers. I did talk about this movie before. I tried to watch it months ago but I still did not finish it. It all started with the introduction. I had this movie on break for hours, even days. It is about two females sitting on a bench and talking to each other. And...

incels.is

2.sexual selection: unlike other species where the cock size has key role to attract the partener, it seems that for humans there were also other factors that played here (food, money, shelter, face, height, fame etc), so what happens in 2025 is sexual selection, foids choose the best traits for reproduction height/chad face, but since the other factors that mattered since all foids in 2025 has a shelter/food/ makes more money than man, it seems that it only remained the only factor that matters during the sexual pleasure, the cock size or it might be seen in a foid s brain as something that is something more fit for the survival/ successful reproduction of the species since if there would be no sexual pleasure, everybody would stop reproducing, which can bring the extinction, so the better is the sexual pleasure the more certain a species survives since everybody would want to reproduce even more

You are unable to experience pleasure with a small penis. You are only able to experience pleasure and joy if you have a big penis. Being a man and having a small penis compeltely destroys the purpose to be a man in the first place.

3.the lack of the physical constraints: unlike other organs, heart etc, the penis can vary in size since the vagina can expand for a bigger size, otherwise the survival of the species wouldn t be so great

The question is, why does penis size vary? It is not a good thing. Variety is not a good thing. Variety is a deviation. Something that does not last at all.

I do not know why that is. I only have come to the conclusion, that this seems to be a joke.

 

[Homegrownman326]

Let us assume, this is true. The questio nstill remains to why big pensies exist in the first place? How and why did big pensies come into existence in the first place? What is the mechanism behind of that? How did it come into existence if it was not there before? Or was it there before? But if it was there before, then why do small pensies exist? The same quesition also applies here.



Coitus happens daily only for females and for a specific group of men.



It is all about coitus.



Why was not there uniformity in the first place? Why is there uniformity in animals. For example male donkeys. They all have big penises. They have an unviersal penis size that is big. Variation is contraproductive to evolution. It is so bad, that variations dies out. There is also a good German documentary about evolution, that also points this out. For exmaple, random mutations do not survive. Variations does not survive. Any variation is a deviation from the natural state.



It is impossible to have coitus with a small penis. Therefore small penises should not even exist.



Then again. How and why do big pensies exist in the first palce? Where are they coming from? How did it come into existence? Bigger is always better. I also made a thread about this:

"Who says size doesn't matter" - Heretic - Size determines fate

This thread contains some spoilers. I did talk about this movie before. I tried to watch it months ago but I still did not finish it. It all started with the introduction. I had this movie on break for hours, even days. It is about two females sitting on a bench and talking to each other. And...

incels.is

You are unable to experience pleasure with a small penis. You are only able to experience pleasure and joy if you have a big penis. Being a man and having a small penis compeltely destroys the purpose to be a man in the first place.



The question is, why does penis size vary? It is not a good thing. Variety is not a good thing. Variety is a deviation. Something that does not last at all.

I do not know why that is. I only have come to the conclusion, that this seems to be a joke.

Penis size is a product of sexual selection. Out of all primate species, humans have the largest and by a large margin. Why does it vary? There are two reasons. 1. Genetic mutation or hormonal disregulation 2. Female hypergamy was regulated to differing degrees depending on the ecology. In a cold and food-scarce ecology, women are much more dependent on men to survive; therefore, they cannot express their hypergamous tendencies, as men will only hunt and share food with women who give them sex. In patriarchal societies, women's hypergamy was suppressed, and almost all men were given wives. Neither of these examples allowed women to express their hypergamy, which is wired to reproduce with the men with the largest dicks. In a warm, food-abundant ecology, women can source their own food and form alliances much like Bonobos and select for the men with the largest dicks.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Let us assume, this is true. The questio nstill remains to why big pensies exist in the first place? How and why did big pensies come into existence in the first place? What is the mechanism behind of that? How did it come into existence if it was not there before? Or was it there before? But if it was there before, then why do small pensies exist? The same quesition also applies here.

mutation, genetic mutation that gave birth to either big dicks, or to either small cocks, but since big cocks are very rare, and small cocks u can find them everywhere,

i d say that the genetic mutation was of a big cock, so that genetic mutation of a big cock survived until today
i once saw something saying that blue eyes were actually a genetic mutation first, that they were never something natural but passed down from birth to birth and survived

Coitus happens daily only for females and for a specific group of men.

yes, it s daily for females, but this doesn t men that all men wouldn t have sex daily, the only difference is that females can have daily while men only a very small portion can have daily

Why was not there uniformity in the first place? Why is there uniformity in animals. For example male donkeys. They all have big penises. They have an unviersal penis size that is big. Variation is contraproductive to evolution. It is so bad, that variations dies out. There is also a good German documentary about evolution, that also points this out. For exmaple, random mutations do not survive. Variations does not survive. Any variation is a deviation from the natural state.

i wrote this, uniformity it seems that it was never a first plan for the male species since there were also other factors that came in play (like shelter/food/money/ wars etc,etc)

i also looked at this and all animals kind of looks the same as i told u, i wrote to u that i can t be placed in the same species as a chad, animals have less variety, all animals kind of looks the same, the same height, same features if they are the same species, like cats, all cats looks the same

random mutations and variations might not survive in the animal kingdom since animals have lower iq and can t think like humans, so any variation of the natural state is bad for them since animals are nigga maxxed, all violent, meaning that a variation can t survive in the animal kingdom since that variation would be killed by other animals or be left behind by animals since it s seen as weak

variations can survive in the human species because of our higher iq

It is impossible to have coitus with a small penis. Therefore small penises should not even exist.

to have sex it s impossible, yeah, it is impossible with a small one, but i talked about how the main goal for our cocks is for the sperm to reach the egg, i told u that during all of our history, foids were never able to have sex daily, or to have sex without reproduction/kids, so even a small cock can impregnate a foid because the sperm still can reach the egg

size it s used more for pleasure, that s why now in 2025 there is such a big increase in foids that talks about dickpill because now foids have sex without reproduction/kids, basically it erases the main goal for our cocks, the sperm reaches the egg and only leaves the size for the sexual pleasure which ofc the foids are gonna choose a bigger one

Then again. How and why do big pensies exist in the first palce? Where are they coming from? How did it come into existence? Bigger is always better.

genetic mutation, all cocks were smaller first, then there happened an genetic mutation of a big cock, then it passed down, ofc bigger is better, just like how the average height can increase if tall foids reproduces with only tall man and the short foids stops to reproduce, an average cock size would increase just like height if foids would reproduce with only big cocks
now, i can t say if a big cock it s only given by the dad s genes, or somehow the mother must also have some genes for a big cock to pass down

You are unable to experience pleasure with a small penis. You are only able to experience pleasure and joy if you have a big penis.

yes, u can t, but that s only in 2025 when u can have sex without to reproduce, during all our history, we never were able to reproduce without having kids, now there are birth controls, so the main function of the cock that is used for the sperm to reach the egg is gone, only leaving the sexual pleasure which is with a big cock,
but this also means that having sex without having kids is not a natural state, even if u have sex only once

The question is, why does penis size vary? It is not a good thing. Variety is not a good thing. Variety is a deviation

genetic mutation, variation in the human kingdom is different than the animal kingdom since we have higher iq, which might help that devation to survive even if its not a good one!
give a species from an animal kingdom some genetic mutation and they will go extinct because they lack the iq to survive, that s why i ve came to the conclusion that s a reason as to why all animals from a single species kind of looks the same, have the same features, height, etc, yet the chad is a different species than me

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Penis size is a product of sexual selection. Out of all primate species, humans have the largest and by a large margin. Why does it vary? There are two reasons. 1. Genetic mutation or hormonal disregulation 2. Female hypergamy was regulated to differing degrees depending on the ecology. In a cold and food-scarce ecology, women are much more dependent on men to survive; therefore, they cannot express their hypergamous tendencies, as men will only hunt and share food with women who give them sex. In patriarchal societies, women's hypergamy was suppressed, and almost all men were given wives. Neither of these examples allowed women to express their hypergamy, which is wired to reproduce with the men with the largest dicks. In a warm, food-abundant ecology, women can source their own food and form alliances much like Bonobos and select for the men with the largest dicks.

 

[Caichan]

no point in having a big dick with an ugly face

 

[Homegrownman326]

no point in having a big dick with an ugly face

Some of us on here are dicklets with normie faces

 

[Caichan]

Some of us on here are dicklets with normie faces

no bragging, but i’d rather have that then the situation here

 

[Homegrownman326]

no bragging, but i’d rather have that then the situation here

It's no different, really, even if you got the chance to ascend, she'd reject you in the bedroom. Absolutely brutal

 

[LastGerman]

Penis size is a product of sexual selection. Out of all primate species, humans have the largest and by a large margin. Why does it vary? There are two reasons. 1. Genetic mutation

Genetic mutation does not last. There is a German documentary that also questions "evolution". German scientists, for example Prof. Siegfred Scherer is also one of them. He also hosted a presentation back then in 2010 or 2011. "Variety" is a contradiction to "evolution". Also, how does variety exist in the first place? How does a genetic mutation occur in the first place? What is the mechanism?

hormonal disregulation

That is a valid.

2. Female hypergamy was regulated to differing degrees depending on the ecology. In a cold and food-scarce ecology, women are much more dependent on men to survive; therefore, they cannot express their hypergamous tendencies, as men will only hunt and share food with women who give them sex. In patriarchal societies, women's hypergamy was suppressed, and almost all men were given wives. Neither of these examples allowed women to express their hypergamy, which is wired to reproduce with the men with the largest dicks. In a warm, food-abundant ecology, women can source their own food and form alliances much like Bonobos and select for the men with the largest dicks.

I am not so sure about that part. What I am saying is this. Ultiamtely, most of it is hypothetical. I will talk about it at the end of my post.

mutation, genetic mutation that gave birth to either big dicks, or to either small cocks, but since big cocks are very rare, and small cocks u can find them everywhere,

I will just copy and paste here:
Genetic mutation do not last. There is a German documentary that also questions "evolution". German scientists, for example Prof. Siegfred Scherer is also one of them. He also hosted a presentation back then in 2010 or 2011. "Variety" is a contradiction to "evolution". Also, how does variety exist in the first place? Hwo does a genetic mutation occur in the first place? What is the mechanism?

The question is, how and why do big pensies exist in the first place? Just saying "genetic mutation" does not make it so. One must be able to not only describe it, but also demonstrate it, the mechanism behind of that.

What I am saying is this. I am questioning the whole mechanism behind of it. What is the power behind of it? How and why does it happen?

i wrote this, uniformity it seems that it was never a first plan for the male species since there were also other factors that came in play (like shelter/food/money/ wars etc,etc)

i also looked at this and all animals kind of looks the same as i told u, i wrote to u that i can t be placed in the same species as a chad, animals have less variety, all animals kind of looks the same, the same height, same features if they are the same species, like cats, all cats looks the same

random mutations and variations might not survive in the animal kingdom since animals have lower iq and can t think like humans, so any variation of the natural state is bad for them since animals are nigga maxxed, all violent, meaning that a variation can t survive in the animal kingdom since that variation would be killed by other animals or be left behind by animals since it s seen as weak

variations can survive in the human species because of our higher iq

Any variety is a deviation, that will lead to demise. Also, are not we witnessing it right now?

to have sex it s impossible, yeah, it is impossible with a small one, but i talked about how the main goal for our cocks is for the sperm to reach the egg, i told u that during all of our history, foids were never able to have sex daily, or to have sex without reproduction/kids, so even a small cock can impregnate a foid because the sperm still can reach the egg

size it s used more for pleasure, that s why now in 2025 there is such a big increase in foids that talks about dickpill because now foids have sex without reproduction/kids, basically it erases the main goal for our cocks, the sperm reaches the egg and only leaves the size for the sexual pleasure which ofc the foids are gonna choose a bigger one

Pleasure and in general arousal is important to have coitus. Big penises are used for pleasure yousay and I do agree. Therefore, big penises are important and absolutely significant to have coitus in the first place. Therefore, only big penises should exist.

genetic mutation, all cocks were smaller first, then there happened an genetic mutation of a big cock, then it passed down, ofc bigger is better, just like how the average height can increase if tall foids reproduces with only tall man and the short foids stops to reproduce, an average cock size would increase just like height if foids would reproduce with only big cocks
now, i can t say if a big cock it s only given by the dad s genes, or somehow the mother must also have some genes for a big cock to pass down

You do have a point here in regards to heritage. That also reminds me of @Yabadadabadoo
He told me what happened. What happened to him. His grandfather has and I quote "an enormous penis". Apparently, one family member saw him naked once and she described it as and I quote "enormous". Furthermore, @Yabadadabadoo father also have a big penis. Also, his grandmother, if I remember correctly, was back then the best-looking female in her area. With that being said. @Yabadadabadoo did not get any of those traits. As a matter of fact, despite his father and gradfather having big pensies and his grandfather and i quote having "an enormous penis", he did not get any of that.

@Yabadadabadoo no sneers here.

yes, u can t, but that s only in 2025 when u can have sex without to reproduce, during all our history, we never were able to reproduce without having kids, now there are birth controls, so the main function of the cock that is used for the sperm to reach the egg is gone, only leaving the sexual pleasure which is with a big cock,
but this also means that having sex without having kids is not a natural state, even if u have sex only once

Sexual pleasure was always important, also back then.

genetic mutation, variation in the human kingdom is different than the animal kingdom since we have higher iq, which might help that devation to survive even if its not a good one!
give a species from an animal kingdom some genetic mutation and they will go extinct because they lack the iq to survive, that s why i ve came to the conclusion that s a reason as to why all animals from a single species kind of looks the same, have the same features, height, etc, yet the chad is a different species than me

@Homegrownman326 @AdolfRizzler
In regards to variety, perhaps I should quote someone else here as well and let them speak. Because when I do it, most would think, I am just talking. So, @Kamanbert and also @GeckoBus if I remember correctly wrote about it as well. They basically went over this topic, explaining, that the "actual average" is Chad. I did expand on this and I also applied this to penis size as well. For exmaple, your premise is, that the penis size was small back then. It is more likely so, that it was the other way around, as Chad is the "actual average". Therefore, "variety" is a deviation from that average, which is seen as not desriable, as it is indeed not desriable.

I always use mostly questions. They are also rhetorical as in, the answer to it is there. The answer to it is also really simple, as the question is also simple. For eample, I always use a very simple question. I will also ask it here.

If we would go around any men what penis size they want. Asking them if they want a 4.5 inch penis or a 9 inch penis? The question itself is very stupid because the answer to it is clear. But this is all what this is about.

The question is there to pinpoint what is desriable. We are able to tell what is desirable, obviously. We know about that. A simple question with a simple answer. The same goes for my question in regards to "genetic mutation". What I am basically saying is this. No one is able to describe what a "genetic mutation" is and how it works, how and why it occurs, what are themechanisms behind of that. I am just merely questining it.

No sneers here, I am not trying to get at anyone of you here. I just want to be clear on that. All I am saying is, I am not pretending to know what this is. Therefore, I am only able to question it, mostly also rhetorical, since the answer to it is clear, because we simply do not know. Of course, you both made some reasonable points here and there, so, I am not saying, yo uare wrong with anything here. All I am saying is, it is just really hypothetical and I am not pretending to know more about it than for exmaple Prof. Siegfred Scherer or anyone in this documentary here:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qSrxCOUrf0


I know it is in German. Perhaps someone else here, for example, @TooSomething is able to confirm its validity. They talked and went over "genetic mutation". But also just for the sake of it, I indulge because I always do. I am jsut a retard and I do accept everything both of you said. Let us say it is just genetic mutation. The question still remains to what is the mechanism here and how and why it occurs in the first place. Or perhaps, it really is just "randomness" and we see this randomness in genetic mutation. Both seem very similar, right? So, what even is a genetic mutation? But even, if we would replace it with only, let us say, with randomness or for example RNG, how does this randomness occur?

I am really jsut asking question. I am not saying, that I know more than any of you here. It is not about that. I certainly do not know more about it than Prof. Siegfred Scherer who also just asked questions. Both of you made some points here, so, no sneers to both of you.

But ultimately, if we are being honest here, msot of it is hypothetical. And this is what Prof. Siegfred Scherer is also talking about. He talks about empiricism.

The penis pill really and utterly destroyed me when I was very young. I always knew it. So, really no sneers here, I think you are based users who also put effort into their posts. Perhaps you are both right and ultimately, it all comes down to randomness. Randomness, that lies beyond any comprehension and I just lost. Perhaps it is that simple. So, I have basically come full circle. Simple question to a simple answer.

 

[LastGerman]

no point in having a big dick with an ugly face

no bragging, but i’d rather have that then the situation here

And here we go again. Another one who has a big penis, that is saying the same things as other users who have big penises. It is always the same. I ask myself. Is this even real? This seems to be some kind of joke from this existence. I am tired of it. I am tired of being tired of it.

Just look at that @TooSomething @starystulejarz @Spooky_Heejin @Itsoverm8 @NearestNeighbor

 

[Caichan]

And here we go again. Another one who has a big penis, that is saying the same things as other users who have big penises. It is always the same. I ask myself. Is this even real? This seems to be some kind of joke from this existence. I am tired of it. I am tired of being tired of it.

Just look at that @TooSomething @starystulejarz @Spooky_Heejin @Itsoverm8 @NearestNeighbor[/
[/QUOTE]
you really tagged everyone for me saying that dickpill is not as brutal as other things, like height and face? unless it’s below 3 inches it’s not brutal

 

[LastGerman]

@Caichan
It seems like your reply went into the quote box, so I am just quoting you. Yes, I did quote other users, in this case specific users. You say, the penis pill is not as brutal as others. But this is coming from someone who has a big penis. You do not know what it is like to have a small penis. Then you say, unless it is below 3 inches it is not that brutal. Coming from someone who has a big penis. By the way, 3 inches is officially a micropenis. Below 3.7 inches is officially a micropenis. So, yes. 3 inches is really bad. It is absolutely devastating. 4 inches is bad. This is really close to an actual micropenis. 4.5 inches is bad. Also close to an actual micropenis. 5 inches is bad. 5.5 inches is bad. This is all really bad. One worse than the other. Saying it is not that brutal, while you have a big penis. You do not know what it is like to have a small penis and be grateful that you do not have one. Having a small penis is a curse. Having a small penis compeltely destroys the purpose to be a man in the first place. You really should be grateful that you have a big penis.

 

[Eunuch]

Normalize shaming women for small clits

 

[BPJ]

Let us assume, this is true. The questio nstill remains to why big pensies exist in the first place? How and why did big pensies come into existence in the first place? What is the mechanism behind of that? How did it come into existence if it was not there before? Or was it there before? But if it was there before, then why do small pensies exist? The same quesition also applies here.



Coitus happens daily only for females and for a specific group of men.



It is all about coitus.



Why was not there uniformity in the first place? Why is there uniformity in animals. For example male donkeys. They all have big penises. They have an unviersal penis size that is big. Variation is contraproductive to evolution. It is so bad, that variations dies out. There is also a good German documentary about evolution, that also points this out. For exmaple, random mutations do not survive. Variations does not survive. Any variation is a deviation from the natural state.



It is impossible to have coitus with a small penis. Therefore small penises should not even exist.



Then again. How and why do big pensies exist in the first palce? Where are they coming from? How did it come into existence? Bigger is always better. I also made a thread about this:

"Who says size doesn't matter" - Heretic - Size determines fate

This thread contains some spoilers. I did talk about this movie before. I tried to watch it months ago but I still did not finish it. It all started with the introduction. I had this movie on break for hours, even days. It is about two females sitting on a bench and talking to each other. And...

incels.is

You are unable to experience pleasure with a small penis. You are only able to experience pleasure and joy if you have a big penis. Being a man and having a small penis compeltely destroys the purpose to be a man in the first place.



The question is, why does penis size vary? It is not a good thing. Variety is not a good thing. Variety is a deviation. Something that does not last at all.

I do not know why that is. I only have come to the conclusion, that this seems to be a joke.

spot on, as usual. I really dont understand the udnerlying biological/ evolutionary reasons for this specific variation ( the penis sizes).


it just doesnt fucking add up. but at least OP provided a useful and conclusive theory/ explanation as to why it could be the case.

 

[LastGerman]

spot on, as usual. I really dont understand the udnerlying biological/ evolutionary reasons for this specific variation ( the penis sizes).


it just doesnt fucking add up. but at least OP provided a useful and conclusive theory/ explanation as to why it could be the case.

@DreamCoper also made a well-elaborated thread about it. This thread is another one. There are attempts to explain it. Some points are valid. On the other hand, nothing of it really adds up. The variety in penis size is so vast, it really doe snot add up. let us comapre this to height. For example, one man has a 2 inch penis. The other man has a 9 inch penis. Bot sizes do exist. This is how vast the difference is in penis size. If we would compare this to height. Let us say, that one man with a 2 inch penis would be 1 meter tall in comparison. With that being said, that would conclude, that the other man who has a 9 inch penis, is almsot 5 meters tall. This alone is enough to come to the conclusion, that there is something wrong with the penis size. I do not know what happened, but there is clearly something wrong with it. It just does not add up.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Any variety is a deviation, that will lead to demise. Also, are not we witnessing it right now?

yes, but variation or genetic mutation doesn t mean that it s also good, just like this says it ,,Mutations can be beneficial, neutral, or harmful for the organism, but mutations do not “try” to supply what the organism “needs.” Factors in the environment may influence the rate of mutation but are not generally thought to influence the direction of mutation.".

Mutations are random

evolution.berkeley.edu

just like how 2 healthy parents can give birth to an down syndrome kid, that s also genetic mutation which was random, but not beneficial to him, more harmful

[THEORY] The Genetic Lottery Pill | Chads are Made By Chance

*This post will take three minutes to read, but if you're lazy the bare-bone minimum to understand are highlighted in green Hypothesis: We all had a chance at being Chad's. That's the truth. You can all it a cope if you want, but it's true. Our genes always had the potential to be attractive...

incels.is

i ve also once thought if chads are somehow made random/ by chance, and i found this thread, like me looking at chico s parent they aren t chad or stacy, they do have some genetic potential there, but chico was never supposed to be pslgod, chico was just a variation/ genetic mutation in his gene pool, but ofc if your gene pool are from some short ugly parents 99.9% u will be the same, see chico s variation happened random, not because he wanted it, variations can be either beneficial or harmful, chico if he didn t have the luck, he could have ended worse, and then nobody would know, because he would have been another failed man with problems and not a pslgod. or henry cavill with his brothers, they all had the same genes, but henry cavill was a variation of a pslgod, but his brothers aren t

making a kid basically means to copy ur DNA or half of your DNA to your kid, but sometimes this can fail and won t be copied successful, which means that if ur dad has some traits, it can fail and your dna won t have the same trait like him, now in the penis size, i can t tell if everything u need so that u can also have a big one, is that ur dad is the only one that needs the big cock dna, or if your mother also needs big dick genes to pass to you, or there can be a failure when your dna is copying ur father s dna and u will end with a small one (basically a variation/genetic mutation, which is not good, it could also have happened with height)

Mutation, Repair and Recombination - Genomes - NCBI Bookshelf

A mutation (Section 14.1) is a change in the nucleotide sequence of a short region of a genome (Figure 14.1A). Many mutations are point mutations that replace one nucleotide with another; others involve insertion or deletion of one or a few nucleotides. Mutations result either from errors in DNA replication

The causes of mutations​

Some mutations are spontaneous errors in replication that evade the proofreading function of the DNA polymerases that synthesize new polynucleotides at the replication fork (Section 13.2.2). These mutations are called mismatches because they are positions where the nucleotide that is inserted into the daughter polynucleotide does not match,

Errors in replication are a source of point mutations​

just like we had mutations during our history that resulted in lost functions of our body

Yes, humans have lost numerous features and functions over their evolutionary history, including vestigial organs like the tailbone and appendix, a reduction in jaw size and tooth proportions with the adoption of cooking, a decrease in general brain and body size compared to ancestors, and a loss of the ability to synthesize vitamin C, among other changes.

‘Deletions’ from the human genome may be what made us human

The loss of about 10,000 bits of DNA over the course of our evolutionary history helped differentiate us from other mammals, a team of Yale researchers found.

news.yale.edu

basically a mutation can make us lose a function or gain a function. either that function we lose/gain was a good/bad one

in the end, what can i say, u/me have a small penis because:
1.if ur dad had a big one and u have a small one there was either a variation/mutation/ u failed to succesfully copy his dna of a big cock which doesn t mean it s a good variation, just like height, the kid can end short
2.you just weren t lucky at birth just like chico, his parents weren t great but he was lucky and struck gold, neither u were lucky to be born with different parents that could give u a big one when the sperm meets the egg
3.your gene pool never had a big cock
4.your genetic line of parents, all of them had a small cock, so when it was your turn to be made, ur cock size ended what ur genetic line had, if ur genetic line is of a small one, how can u end with a big one unless u had a variation/mutation (good mutation) of a big one
just like how my mom is short, my grandma is short, my great grandma is short, neither my grandpa is tall, neither my dad is tall, how can i end up tall if my genetic line is of a loser line?

now i told u that we can have variations which doesn t equal good variations, i told u that i look in the animal kingdom and all animals from the same species kind of looks the same, i can t compare myself with a chad, he s like a different species, if the normal was a chad and all of us are just bad variations that survived because of our higher iq, look at our face and a chad s face, it s clearly who is normal and who is a bad variation
that s why we lose and chad wins, because he s the normal and we are just variations that at one point had to go extinct because we are not good variations, that s also a reason as to why humans has to look so different when all animals from the same species kind of looks the same

 

[DreamCoper]

Penis size is a product of sexual selection. Out of all primate species, humans have the largest and by a large margin. Why does it vary? There are two reasons. 1. Genetic mutation or hormonal disregulation 2. Female hypergamy was regulated to differing degrees depending on the ecology. In a cold and food-scarce ecology, women are much more dependent on men to survive; therefore, they cannot express their hypergamous tendencies, as men will only hunt and share food with women who give them sex. In patriarchal societies, women's hypergamy was suppressed, and almost all men were given wives. Neither of these examples allowed women to express their hypergamy, which is wired to reproduce with the men with the largest dicks. In a warm, food-abundant ecology, women can source their own food and form alliances much like Bonobos and select for the men with the largest dicks.

Forgot to talk about this in my thread, a very significant factor indeed

 

[DreamCoper]

Let us assume, this is true. The questio nstill remains to why big pensies exist in the first place? How and why did big pensies come into existence in the first place? What is the mechanism behind of that? How did it come into existence if it was not there before? Or was it there before? But if it was there before, then why do small pensies exist? The same quesition also applies here.

Read somewhere that dick size has increased by an inch in the last 100 years, and obviously look at ancient male statues. Big penises really only exist in the modern world due to foids ability to practice hypergamy.

 

[DreamCoper]

Why was not there uniformity in the first place? Why is there uniformity in animals. For example male donkeys. They all have big penises.

standard deviation is actually lower in humans, we have quite low genetic diversity compared to most other mammals.

 

[DreamCoper]

yes, u can t, but that s only in 2025 when u can have sex without to reproduce, during all our history, we never were able to reproduce without having kids, now there are birth controls, so the main function of the cock that is used for the sperm to reach the egg is gone, only leaving the sexual pleasure which is with a big cock,
but this also means that having sex without having kids is not a natural state, even if u have sex only once

I agree with @AdolfRizzler here, penises were meant to fulfil one rarely done purpose, but now in modern degenerate society most are useless for this new purpose of hedonistic pleasure.

 

[DreamCoper]

It's no different, really, even if you got the chance to ascend, she'd reject you in the bedroom. Absolutely brutal

it is better to be average with small penis than ugly with average penis. Either way you will never have sex but with average face you will be treated better in day-to-day life and no foid will every see your penis anyway.

 

[DreamCoper]

Also, how does variety exist in the first place? How does a genetic mutation occur in the first place? What is the mechanism?

Errors in mrna copying process, gamma rays etc.

 

[Grodd]

It's purely because of evolution and biological traits inherited

 

[LastGerman]

yes, but variation or genetic mutation doesn t mean that it s also good, just like this says it ,,Mutations can be beneficial, neutral, or harmful for the organism, but mutations do not “try” to supply what the organism “needs.” Factors in the environment may influence the rate of mutation but are not generally thought to influence the direction of mutation.".

Mutations are random

evolution.berkeley.edu

just like how 2 healthy parents can give birth to an down syndrome kid, that s also genetic mutation which was random, but not beneficial to him, more harmful

[THEORY] The Genetic Lottery Pill | Chads are Made By Chance

*This post will take three minutes to read, but if you're lazy the bare-bone minimum to understand are highlighted in green Hypothesis: We all had a chance at being Chad's. That's the truth. You can all it a cope if you want, but it's true. Our genes always had the potential to be attractive...

incels.is

i ve also once thought if chads are somehow made random/ by chance, and i found this thread, like me looking at chico s parent they aren t chad or stacy, they do have some genetic potential there, but chico was never supposed to be pslgod, chico was just a variation/ genetic mutation in his gene pool, but ofc if your gene pool are from some short ugly parents 99.9% u will be the same, see chico s variation happened random, not because he wanted it, variations can be either beneficial or harmful, chico if he didn t have the luck, he could have ended worse, and then nobody would know, because he would have been another failed man with problems and not a pslgod. or henry cavill with his brothers, they all had the same genes, but henry cavill was a variation of a pslgod, but his brothers aren t

making a kid basically means to copy ur DNA or half of your DNA to your kid, but sometimes this can fail and won t be copied successful, which means that if ur dad has some traits, it can fail and your dna won t have the same trait like him, now in the penis size, i can t tell if everything u need so that u can also have a big one, is that ur dad is the only one that needs the big cock dna, or if your mother also needs big dick genes to pass to you, or there can be a failure when your dna is copying ur father s dna and u will end with a small one (basically a variation/genetic mutation, which is not good, it could also have happened with height)

Mutation, Repair and Recombination - Genomes - NCBI Bookshelf

A mutation (Section 14.1) is a change in the nucleotide sequence of a short region of a genome (Figure 14.1A). Many mutations are point mutations that replace one nucleotide with another; others involve insertion or deletion of one or a few nucleotides. Mutations result either from errors in DNA replication

The causes of mutations​

Some mutations are spontaneous errors in replication that evade the proofreading function of the DNA polymerases that synthesize new polynucleotides at the replication fork (Section 13.2.2). These mutations are called mismatches because they are positions where the nucleotide that is inserted into the daughter polynucleotide does not match,

Errors in replication are a source of point mutations​

just like we had mutations during our history that resulted in lost functions of our body

Yes, humans have lost numerous features and functions over their evolutionary history, including vestigial organs like the tailbone and appendix, a reduction in jaw size and tooth proportions with the adoption of cooking, a decrease in general brain and body size compared to ancestors, and a loss of the ability to synthesize vitamin C, among other changes.

‘Deletions’ from the human genome may be what made us human

The loss of about 10,000 bits of DNA over the course of our evolutionary history helped differentiate us from other mammals, a team of Yale researchers found.

news.yale.edu

basically a mutation can make us lose a function or gain a function. either that function we lose/gain was a good/bad one

in the end, what can i say, u/me have a small penis because:
1.if ur dad had a big one and u have a small one there was either a variation/mutation/ u failed to succesfully copy his dna of a big cock which doesn t mean it s a good variation, just like height, the kid can end short
2.you just weren t lucky at birth just like chico, his parents weren t great but he was lucky and struck gold, neither u were lucky to be born with different parents that could give u a big one when the sperm meets the egg
3.your gene pool never had a big cock
4.your genetic line of parents, all of them had a small cock, so when it was your turn to be made, ur cock size ended what ur genetic line had, if ur genetic line is of a small one, how can u end with a big one unless u had a variation/mutation (good mutation) of a big one
just like how my mom is short, my grandma is short, my great grandma is short, neither my grandpa is tall, neither my dad is tall, how can i end up tall if my genetic line is of a loser line?

now i told u that we can have variations which doesn t equal good variations, i told u that i look in the animal kingdom and all animals from the same species kind of looks the same, i can t compare myself with a chad, he s like a different species, if the normal was a chad and all of us are just bad variations that survived because of our higher iq, look at our face and a chad s face, it s clearly who is normal and who is a bad variation
that s why we lose and chad wins, because he s the normal and we are just variations that at one point had to go extinct because we are not good variations, that s also a reason as to why humans has to look so different when all animals from the same species kind of looks the same

Exactly. We do agree, that "genetic mutation" and "variety" is not alaways a good thing. In this case, it says genetic mutation is a spontaneous error in replication. That does not explain it or to be more specific about it, the mechanism behind of that. But I also want to be clear here, that anything about this is really just hypothetical. Also the explantion to what the cause of a mutation is hypothetical and also leads to questions. This is why I also posted the video to the German scientists, who basically brought up a valid point at 1:15 in the video.

So, again. Nothing of it explains to why big penises exist in the first place. This is what I am trying to get at. But I am not necessarily disagreeing with you here either, as I also went over it in my last post as well.

But, you posted a really interesting and important part about jaw size and tooth proportions with the adoption of cooking. With that being said, I think we have been destroyed early on when we were children. What you posted also just confirmes it. So, I do agree here. With that being said, one would be ablke to conclude, that bad looks, perhaps even small pensies are not something that existed back then, but is a product of exactly that or at the evry least has an impact on it.

So, I do not disagree with your points here.

Also, if I look at "genetic mutation" and variation again, despite it being hypothetical, I will also just agree to it for the sake of argument, I would also have to agree with you, that we are indeed just the bad variation and this is our demise.

Forgot to talk about this in my thread, a very significant factor indeed

I also went over this in my post.

Read somewhere that dick size has increased by an inch in the last 100 years, and obviously look at ancient male statues. Big penises really only exist in the modern world due to foids ability to practice hypergamy.

Perhaps penis size increased by an inch in the last 100 years, perhaps not. This is really all just hypothetical. I am not disputing any of that. I am just being honest here and say, there is nothing to prove or disprove it. Also for ancient male statues. This has also been explained on the forum here, I think, it was by @starystulejarz if I remember correctly.

As for hypergamy. You say big penises really only exist in the modern world due to females practicing hypergamy. My question still stand. How did big penises come into this existence in the first place then? You and others might hate me for saying that but is not hypergamy a good thing then because it would get rid of small penises, so that only big penises exist? I also want to add, I am not looking at it as mere human. I am looking at this topic from an outside perspective and at its entailments it has. Because ultimately, that is a good thing. Let us say you are right about it. I do not see this as something bad. The bad part about it, the bad thing is, that I do not have a big penis.

standard deviation is actually lower in humans, we have quite low genetic diversity compared to most other mammals.

I want to be honest here with you. So instead of just arguing I am just asking you this. Do you really think, this is true? If so, then what is the vast difference in penis size alone? And this is only about penis size.

Errors in mrna copying process, gamma rays etc.

I just copy and paste here:
Exactly. We do agree here, that "genetic mutation" and "variety" is not alaways a good thing. In this case, it says genetic mutation is a spontaneous error in replication. That does not explain anything or to be mroe specific about, the mechanism behind of that. But I also want to be clear here, that anything about this is really just hypothetical. Also the explantion to what the cause of a mutation is hypothetical. This is why I also posted the video to the German scientist, who basically brought up valid point at 1:15 in the video.

So, again. Nothing of it explains to why big penises exist in the first place. This is what I am trying to get at. But I am not necessarily disagreeing with you here either, as I also went over it in my last post as well.

I really just want to say, that I am not necessarily disagreeing with any of you here. I even indulge and I even abandon my position also just for the sake of argument. I also had a nother conversation about this in my thread which I will jsut post here:

9 inches is the universal penis size - proven with ChatGPT

I said: I just want to do a simple inversion of the things I am about to tell you. I do not want any explanation from you. This is just an experiment and only engage with that. So, do not avoid what I said and do not change the subject. Only engage with the comparison I am going to make and tell...

incels.is

It is about this post specifically:

What is wrong with my "assumption"? It is not an assumption, I am just going with what the female anatomy is and I took that anatomy and inverted it. This is all I did.



It is. Otherwise they would not be able to insert large dildos without any problem. I also posted the thread @Spooky_Heejin made as a reference. I am not making any of this up. I am actually just pointing out to it. I am also using references to make my point. I let others speak for me, so, no one would come to the conclusion, that I am making this up. Or how to you explain female inserting 9 inch dildos without any problem?



I have a question. Did you even read my post? I also used references and I quoted @Spooky_Heejin as well as his well-elaborated thread regarding that topic. I am not the one making that up.

But I indulge because I always do. Let us say, you are right about it. Let us say, all the numbers are just off. So, let us remove the numbers for now. I just want to go back to my example about females isnerting 9 inch dildos into them without any problem. We do not need any numbers, we do not even need to know the exact anatomy of it. Females are able to isner big dildos without any problem. That alone is enough, yet apparently it is not.

Let us be honest here. Regardless of what I say, you will just disagree with it. We also had multiple talks about it and it seems it just never ends. It is the same with @Violet loner
It is like you always forget what we talked about before and when there is another thread, you starts all over again. I also said this to @Violet loner

By the way, I am really trying to reason here with you. This is why I indulge and I indulge even further.
Let us say, I am completely wrong and you are right about it. So, it is not 9 inches, it also is not 8 inches. Let us say it is 7 inches. I think, this is fair just for the sake of argument. My question still stands. So what? I am not even close to 7 inches. So even if it was "only" 7 inches, I am still not able to reach that. I am not even close.



This is not what I did. I just used the female anatomy. I compared it to the anatomy of most men. I also described this in other posts, saying, that the female anatomy does not correspond with the anatomy of most men.
Even disregarding the anatomy, it is still enough to point out, what you called "fetish whores" that easily insert 9 inch dildos. It is not just them. It is all females. So, I am not pointing out to a marginal group here. I am talking about all females in general. I am pointing out to the nature of females. I am making a general statement.



The average female is able to take big dildos. They are made for this. This is what I am trying to say here. I am making a general statement about all females, females in general.



Of course ChatGPT say "in your framework", what else should it use as a reference? By the way, what you are pointing out here is not a counter argument. I want to be clear on that. So, it is not about ChatGPT, but about my framework, right? With that being said, one must take a look at my framework. I even indulged and I said, that even you are right about it and I am wrong about it, my point still stands. So, I will even give it to you and say, that I am wrong with everything and I am I am indeed a retard. I even would abandon my entire position just for the sake of it.

Let us say, you are absolutely right about it and I am wrong. Let us say, there is no unviersal size for females. They are also not clsoer to a unviersal size. Let us say, they have a variety of sizes just like we do. Just for the sake of arugment. My stance still does not change. My desire does not change. I still want to have a big penis. This is what I so desperately desire. Do you understand this? Because I do not think that you do. And you also do not have to because you are unable to relate. So again, no sneers here.



You are right about this. I will not deny that because what yo uare saying is true. In this instance, ChatGPT was only using what I said. You also mentioned it "in your framework". So, in this case my framework.



It seems you got this all wrong. I did not blindly trust some AI. I used this as a tool. It was just an example, nothing more and nothing less. So, if I would not have used ChatGPT and I would have only posted what I have said, would you agree with me then? Let us be honest here, you would not. So, this is not really about ChatGPT here, right? You are using ChatGPT here in order use this to just disagree with what I am saying. This is not about ChatGPT here. So, do not give me that:
"but I really thought you could do better than blindly trust some AI just because it supports your argument".

This really is not about ChatGPT. I made multiple threads about this topic, explaining it. I also made multiple posts about this explaining it.

Since I went through all of your points, I now want to address something.
I really tried to explain this to you over and over and over again to a point where I actually legit become tired of it. I am really trying my best to find the words to desribe it properly. I am trying to elaborate, I really do. I do not know what else to do here.

I really do not udnerstand why you and other come to those threads? You once asked me "why I care". But the question does not even apply to me but rather it applies to you. So let me ask you. Why do you care? Why do you come to such threads? You have a big penis. So why is it, that you always come to those threads? What is the incentive here for you? I am not trying to get at you here. I am legit asking you because I do not understand this. So my question to you is, as well as to some other users here, what is your intention to come to those threads? What is it? I just want to understand.

Also, why is it always the same pattern? Have not you also noticed this as well? I always explain, I go into detail, I elaborate, I even indulge to a point where I even abandon my position just for the sake of argument. I am actually trying here. Yet, this is not enough. Trying was never enough. Whenever I write a lot, elaborating, most of the time, the there is not any reply to it. This is where it ends. And then when another thread comes around, it starts all over again. So, I really want to know why that is? Why and what is it, that this always happens?

I do know why that is. You will most likely disagree with me but I want to be honest here. I think, it all comes down to what you have and what I do not have. I think, it is all about that and it all comes down to it. You know what you have and you know that you are blessed. You know that I desperately desire that. Yo uare able to brag without bragging directly. You are able to show off. It gives you an ego boost. It is the sweetest ego boost there is. I am not attacking you for that. So, no sneers. I just want to be clear here. If I had a big penis, I would do the same thing with the difference, that I would not do it here.

You will most liekly disagree with me on that. But if you are honest here, you know that I am right. And with what happened with @TheJester I am even more certain that I am right about it. But perhaps I am wrong and I will also admit it when I am wrong. I also admit when somebody is right about something. I also did it in here as well. But please tell me. Where am I actually wrong here? Because this is something I am certain about.

@TooSomething @starystulejarz @Spooky_Heejin @Itsoverm8 @NearestNeighbor @AdolfRizzler

I just do not know what this is. But for some reason, everyone just seems to disagree with me here, despite the fact, I am just bringing up questions.

I really do not know what and why that is. But when it comes to this topic, all of the sudden, there is some shift happening. A shift in tone and a shift in conversation. For exmaple, I am trying to engage in a conversation about it. I did not disagree wit hanyone on here. I even agreed on multiple points. I indulge to a point where i even abandon my own position. I do not even have a position, I rather ask questions about it. I really want to be clear on that. I am not making nor did I make a positive claim. But even all of that is not enough. There is still no mutual agreement here and it seems more like it, that people here want to be right about their position, rather to actually enage in a conversation and engae with what I am saying. By the way, I am not even excluding myself from it. But when I do say something, I try to explain, to elaborate and use references, for example, simple anatomy. I am not making claims about anything, more so, I am giving a statement about this topic. This is what I did in my thread, that I made. It looks like an assertion, but it really is not. I am using simple anatomy as a reference and inverted it and just applied that to men. This is all I did. I even indulged and abandoned my position about it and yet there is still no agreement to it. You could say, that I am over the top to say, that females have an unviersal vaginal length of 9 inches. But I also covered this in my thread. I also abandoned this point and even subtracted inches from it. My point still stands. But even if I was completely wrong about it, we do not need numebrs for it. Females are able to insert 9 inch dildos and eve nlarger dildos without any problem. One does not really need anatomy or anything else for it.

I am just saying what I desire. It is all about that. I had multiple talks with other users about this topic for months now. I am not talking about anyone in this thread. It is about users who have big penises and always come to those threads. I also addressed this in my thread as well:

By the way. I just want to say, that @Violet loner has a big penis. He always comes to such threads just to say, that he disagrees. I tried to talk to him multiple times, it is always the same thing over and over again. He also repeats the same lines. It is like he always forgets what we talked about before and when there is another thread, he starts all over again. I legit think, that having a big penis makes you retarded. Having a big penis gives you minus poins in intelligence. All character points went into penis size. I am not saying this to insult them. But if this is the case, where did my character poin go into. I also call myself retarded but I do not have a big penis.
I had this talk with multiple users on here and mostly with users who have big penises. It is always the same pattern. They also always talk against it. It seems, there is some sort of incentive here. I think, they talk against it because it seems like, they are being called out by such threads because they have big penises. Also, it gives them an ego boost. They have a trait, that I so desperately desire and they aware of it. Knowing what they have, they are able to brag about it without even saying it. This is the sweetest ego boost there is. They have a big penis and they know what they have. They are content in life. They are able to experience pleasure and joy.

It is really always the same pattern for months now. They repeat the same lines. It seems like they always forget what we talked about before and when there is another thread, it starts all over again.
All I am saying is that I am tired of it. I am tired of being tired of it. I was even hesitant about posting the thread I made because I knew something like that would happen. This is why I have not been posting that much. This si why I have not made any threads about it recently.
For some reason, they always come to those thread an then once more, another conversation about it starts. This also only happens for this topic specifically. It is also happenign right now once again. I am tired of it. I am just tired of it. I am tired of users here who have big pensies who start to argue for no reason. This is all I am saying here.

 

[incelite88]

We should simply contact porn companies to sequence genomes of actors with big dicks. At least something good from the Jews.

 

[incelite88]

We should also test their parents to see how genetic recombination from mother's side effects the son's dick size.

 

[LastGerman]

We should also test their parents to see how genetic recombination from mother's side effects the son's dick size.

Indeed. This is what we have been talking about. This si also one of your points as well. @AdolfRizzler

 

[AdolfRizzler]

But, you posted a really interesting and important part about jaw size and tooth proportions with the adoption of cooking. With that being said, I think we have been destroyed early on when we were children. What you posted also just confirmes it. So, I do agree here. With that being said, one would be ablke to conclude, that bad looks, perhaps even small pensies are not something that existed back then, but is a product of exactly that or at the evry least has an impact on it.

yes, now that u have this point, it s interesting, like in this study that humans skulls are smaller now, it might be because of food or other environmental factors, or just because we have a different living style than then, we use our brain more and less our body to fight etc

The mystery over why human brains have shrunk over time

The brains of modern humans are around 13% smaller than those of Homo sapiens who lived 100,000 years ago. Exactly why is still puzzling researchers.

www.bbc.com

so this also might explain why foids have an universal 9inch and can use a dildo even bigger than 9inch, maybe in the past we all had big cocks, but due to environment,living style or other factors idk, during this period our cocks became smaller and only few guys have the normal size (aka a big one), just like u said any variation from normal it s not good and it goes extinct.
or another factor is that since in the past males always raped foids, we all had a big cock as normal since all foids has a universal size of 9inch, but since we stopped raping foids, our cocks became smaller just like the skull became smaller or the jaw, because we stopped reproducing through forced impregnation aka rape and switched to some monogamy/hypergamy or we just allowed foids to reproduce with whoever they want (aka the tall chad with big cock, the normal male not a variation of him short ugly with a small cock that goes extinct if foids can choose who to date), so since this function of rape turned into a free selection, our cocks shrinked to smaller one because we stopped using them so much, because we stopped raping foids, because we now reproduce if only a foid select us to reproduce wtih them

look here at what i found on google when i searched (can humans shrink a function or lose a function if we stop using it) ,,
Yes, humans can "shrink" or lose functions by not using them, a concept known as the "use it or lose it" principle of neuroplasticity. When neural circuits aren't engaged, they can degrade, leading to a loss of the associated function. This applies to both physical (like muscles) and mental functions, where neglecting to challenge the brain can result in reduced efficiency and even the loss of specific skills over time.
How it Works

• Neural Circuit Degradation:Brain cells are not muscle fibers, but they still follow the "use it or lose it" principle. When a brain cell or a connected neural pathway is not used, it loses its function. "

Use it or lose it: The less you use your brain, the more it will shrink

While you might know you need to exercise your body to stay strong and healthy, did you know our brains also need exercise daily to stay mentally sharp? ...

www.dailysabah.com

so just like the brain, our cock is not a bone, it s a muscle, and i think u already know that muscles if u don t work them or use them they shrink, just like how u go to gym to make big muscles but if u stop after 3 years u lost all of ur gains

i had one theory, just like i told u, all animals from a species like cats kind of looks the same, bears, all looks the same, only humans looks so different and have so many variations and the only normal that every foid wants is the tall chad with a big cock, but there were variations from a tall chad with a big cock so now these variations (ugly,short,small cock) are going extinct because a variation doesn t equally a good one, it can be a very bad one

All I am saying is that I am tired of it. I am tired of being tired of it. I was even hesitant about posting the thread I made because I knew something like that would happen. This is why I have not been posting that much. This si why I have not made any threads about it recently.

brocel, i m not gonna quote everything u wrote there because it would make this reply too long, don t be like this, it s already over, don t try to attach yourself emotionally too much to something, be like me, i gave up in this life, yes it sucks how some of us with big cocks comes and say stupid things, it s just like a chad saying his looks doesn t matter, why do u need looks, so next time just post what u what to post because me personally i like everytime u post something about dickpill and i always want to see new studies or if u find something new, so if it s somebody that says something just ignore him and post for who is interesed

i m always open to debates or theories or studies, as much i know or i can think because i m neither nikola tesla or some genius with high iq, i m probably stupid as fuck, so i m just saying my opinion or thoughts on what i think it might be a reason etc on a subject, this doesn t mean that i m right, i can be wrong

i told u that the dickpill is the harbor of destruction the destroyer, that many can t accept but somehow can accept the facepill or heightpill etc, but never dickpill, strange, i wonder why

 

[LastGerman]

yes, now that u have this point, it s interesting, like in this study that humans skulls are smaller now, it might be because of food or other environmental factors, or just because we have a different living style than then, we use our brain more and less our body to fight etc

The mystery over why human brains have shrunk over time

The brains of modern humans are around 13% smaller than those of Homo sapiens who lived 100,000 years ago. Exactly why is still puzzling researchers.

www.bbc.com

so this also might explain why foids have an universal 9inch and can use a dildo even bigger than 9inch, maybe in the past we all had big cocks, but due to environment,living style or other factors idk, during this period our cocks became smaller and only few guys have the normal size (aka a big one), just like u said any variation from normal it s not good and it goes extinct.
or another factor is that since in the past males always raped foids, we all had a big cock as normal since all foids has a universal size of 9inch, but since we stopped raping foids, our cocks became smaller just like the skull became smaller or the jaw, because we stopped reproducing through forced impregnation aka rape and switched to some monogamy/hypergamy or we just allowed foids to reproduce with whoever they want (aka the tall chad with big cock, the normal male not a variation of him short ugly with a small cock that goes extinct if foids can choose who to date), so since this function of rape turned into a free selection, our cocks shrinked to smaller one because we stopped using them so much, because we stopped raping foids, because we now reproduce if only a foid select us to reproduce wtih them

look here at what i found on google when i searched (can humans shrink a function or lose a function if we stop using it) ,,
Yes, humans can "shrink" or lose functions by not using them, a concept known as the "use it or lose it" principle of neuroplasticity. When neural circuits aren't engaged, they can degrade, leading to a loss of the associated function. This applies to both physical (like muscles) and mental functions, where neglecting to challenge the brain can result in reduced efficiency and even the loss of specific skills over time.
How it Works

• Neural Circuit Degradation:Brain cells are not muscle fibers, but they still follow the "use it or lose it" principle. When a brain cell or a connected neural pathway is not used, it loses its function. "

Use it or lose it: The less you use your brain, the more it will shrink

While you might know you need to exercise your body to stay strong and healthy, did you know our brains also need exercise daily to stay mentally sharp? ...

www.dailysabah.com

so just like the brain, our cock is not a bone, it s a muscle, and i think u already know that muscles if u don t work them or use them they shrink, just like how u go to gym to make big muscles but if u stop after 3 years u lost all of ur gains

i had one theory, just like i told u, all animals from a species like cats kind of looks the same, bears, all looks the same, only humans looks so different and have so many variations and the only normal that every foid wants is the tall chad with a big cock, but there were variations from a tall chad with a big cock so now these variations (ugly,short,small cock) are going extinct because a variation doesn t equally a good one, it can be a very bad one

I see what you are saying here. I also agree with your factor that you brought up about men with big pensies who raped females. Someone else brought this up as well. I also think, this is valid. I would elaborate on it some more, but I am currently writting another post, that also take some time.

brocel, i m not gonna quote everything u wrote there because it would make this reply too long, don t be like this, it s already over, don t try to attach yourself emotionally too much to something, be like me, i gave up in this life, yes it sucks how some of us with big cocks comes and say stupid things, it s just like a chad saying his looks doesn t matter, why do u need looks, so next time just post what u what to post because me personally i like everytime u post something about dickpill and i always want to see new studies or if u find something new, so if it s somebody that says something just ignore him and post for who is interesed

i m always open to debates or theories or studies, as much i know or i can think because i m neither nikola tesla or some genius with high iq, i m probably stupid as fuck, so i m just saying my opinion or thoughts on what i think it might be a reason etc on a subject, this doesn t mean that i m right, i can be wrong

i told u that the dickpill is the harbor of destruction the destroyer, that many can t accept but somehow can accept the facepill or heightpill etc, but never dickpill, strange, i wonder why

I just want to add. This part here was not about you or anyone on here. I am talking to someone else about this topic right at the moment and I am about to make a post. So, this part of the text was not there to call out anyone on here. This was about specific users who have big pensies and always come to those threads and always start to argue for no reason. I was jsut absically giving a general sumamry of it. I am also legit tired of it. I have been arguing with them since months now.

I should have been more specific about that.

i m always open to debates or theories or studies, as much i know or i can think because i m neither nikola tesla or some genius with high iq, i m probably stupid as fuck, so i m just saying my opinion or thoughts on what i think it might be a reason etc on a subject, this doesn t mean that i m right, i can be wrong

I even indulge. I even abondon my point. I did this in my thread. I always grant them anything they say, their entire point while I also abandon my point. And yet they still refuse to take it from there. I legit do not understand this. Am I doing something wrong here? I just want to understand this.

i told u that the dickpill is the harbor of destruction the destroyer, that many can t accept but somehow can accept the facepill or heightpill etc, but never dickpill, strange, i wonder why

Indeed. This is also what I have been noticing as well. This is going on for months now. It is also always when it is about this topic.

 

[DreamCoper]

Exactly. We do agree, that "genetic mutation" and "variety" is not alaways a good thing. In this case, it says genetic mutation is a spontaneous error in replication. That does not explain it or to be more specific about it, the mechanism behind of that. But I also want to be clear here, that anything about this is really just hypothetical. Also the explantion to what the cause of a mutation is hypothetical and also leads to questions. This is why I also posted the video to the German scientists, who basically brought up a valid point at 1:15 in the video.

Unless you have an organic chemistry or quantum mechanics phd? Otherwise you are not going to understand the mechanisms, the realism of evolution is not the point of discussion here anyway.

 

[LastGerman]

Unless you have an organic chemistry or quantum mechanics phd? Otherwise you are not going to understand the mechanisms, the realism of evolution is not the point of discussion here anyway.

Even then one does not know the mechanism behind of that. What I am saying is, that is is all hypothetical, as well as the realism of evolution itself.