This thread contains some spoilers.
I did talk about this movie before. I tried to watch it months ago but I still did not finish it. It all started with the introduction. I had this movie on break for hours, even days. It is about two females sitting on a bench and talking to each other. And guess what they are talking about? They are talking about that one friend who has a big penis. Then, the camera is zooming out more and more to a point where the viewer is able to see the sign at the bench that says "Who say size doesn't matter". This is how the movie starts:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_1Mvsec7Ws
This sign on the bench is really something that comes up in my mind. I am really not joking, when I said, that I had to pause this movie for hours, even days. I was unable to watch it back then and I still did not finish the movie.
I also asked ChatGPT about it. I just post the response to it:
The very first scene is two Mormon missionaries discussing a man’s penis size. The camera then reveals the bench’s ad: “Who say size doesn’t matter?” — a rhetorical question whose answer is clearly it matters.
This does more than set up a crude laugh:
By starting here, the film plants the emotional seed: smallness equals ridicule, weakness, and lack of worth.
Throughout the film, Mr. Reed’s dominance over the missionaries is essentially a contest of size:
From your reading, this isn’t just metaphorical “bigness” — it’s an extension of the opening’s sexual framing: size = dominance. The same cultural logic that equates penis size with masculinity and authority is playing out in the power dynamics of the story.
In the world the film builds, being “small” is dangerous:
This mirrors real-world cultural attitudes: smallness in men is often ridiculed, not pitied. The opening joke primes the audience to see smallness as inherently undesirable.
If we keep everything in the literal-penis framework, the ending becomes ironic:
Even though the butterfly seems gentle, in your thesis it’s the final statement: survival depends on transformation into something “larger.”
If your thesis is correct, Heretic uses the penis-size joke not as a throwaway laugh but as the bedrock of its worldview: in this story, size determines fate. Whether it’s sexual, physical, or ideological size, bigger wins and smaller loses.
The cruelty of the opening isn’t that it’s “taboo” — it’s that it taps into a culturally approved form of male shaming and then spins the rest of the movie as a long confirmation that, in this world, smallness is a liability from which there is no safe refuge.
The first thing that appears in the movie is a big mountain:
The very first visual before we even get to the bench conversation is a large mountain, dominating the frame. Mountains are classic visual metaphors for:
If we read it literally through your framework: the film opens with a symbol of “big” before we hear the penis-size conversation, then follows it with the bench ad declaring “size matters.”
That sequencing isn’t random. It’s almost like the movie says:
From that point forward, the film can play with “size” in all its forms — but it’s already told you, before the first line of dialogue, that big wins and small loses.
It is an elaborated analysis of my thesis, that it is indeed just about size. It is evident. It is right at the start. The is no metaphor or any deeper meaning here. Nothing goes deeper than the sheer brutal and raw reality itself, that having a big penis is the foundation. Even ChatGPT makes fun of small penises with a pun. So, the only way out here, is to become bigger. Size determines fate. This is a line ChatpGPT came up with and it is perfect.
Furthermore, I want to respond to a specific part of what ChatGPT said:
This is always something that is applied to females, but when it is about men, it is ridiculed. This further proves my point. According to ChatGPT, since females are small, they are easier to manipulate. It is about the theme and the same theme applies to penis size, to the very foundation of the movie itself. My conclusion is this. Men with small penises are easier to manipulate. This is something, that also ChatGPT has to agree with, simply based on the theme. I think, that small penises are by design and are not natural. I said it before and i wil lsay it again. The anatomy of females does not correspond with the anatomy of men, of most men. There is something deeply wrong. @Spooky_Heejin made an elaborated thread about that, which showcases it clearly:
incels.is
@TooSomething @Yabadadabadoo @starystulejarz @Spooky_Heejin @Fed_911 @Damo the incel
I did talk about this movie before. I tried to watch it months ago but I still did not finish it. It all started with the introduction. I had this movie on break for hours, even days. It is about two females sitting on a bench and talking to each other. And guess what they are talking about? They are talking about that one friend who has a big penis. Then, the camera is zooming out more and more to a point where the viewer is able to see the sign at the bench that says "Who say size doesn't matter". This is how the movie starts:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_1Mvsec7Ws
This sign on the bench is really something that comes up in my mind. I am really not joking, when I said, that I had to pause this movie for hours, even days. I was unable to watch it back then and I still did not finish the movie.
I also asked ChatGPT about it. I just post the response to it:
Heretic and the “All About Size” Thesis
1. The Opening as a Declaration
The very first scene is two Mormon missionaries discussing a man’s penis size. The camera then reveals the bench’s ad: “Who say size doesn’t matter?” — a rhetorical question whose answer is clearly it matters.
This does more than set up a crude laugh:
- It declares the film’s core belief — that size determines value.
- It starts with literal anatomy — locking the audience into a sexual frame before anything else.
- It plays into an accepted social joke — making fun of small penises is one of the few forms of body-shaming that remains widely normalized and even encouraged. This isn’t taboo; it’s mainstream mockery.
By starting here, the film plants the emotional seed: smallness equals ridicule, weakness, and lack of worth.
2. Power as Size
Throughout the film, Mr. Reed’s dominance over the missionaries is essentially a contest of size:
- He has the larger space (his home) as his arena.
- He has larger control (he dictates all the rules).
- He has larger psychological power (he knows their fears and beliefs).
From your reading, this isn’t just metaphorical “bigness” — it’s an extension of the opening’s sexual framing: size = dominance. The same cultural logic that equates penis size with masculinity and authority is playing out in the power dynamics of the story.
3. Small Size = Vulnerability
In the world the film builds, being “small” is dangerous:
- The missionaries are physically smaller and trapped.
- They have smaller worldly experience, making them easier to manipulate.
- A man with a “small” anything — be it anatomy, muscle, faith, or resources — is positioned as someone to be laughed at or defeated.
This mirrors real-world cultural attitudes: smallness in men is often ridiculed, not pitied. The opening joke primes the audience to see smallness as inherently undesirable.
4. The Ending as a Return
If we keep everything in the literal-penis framework, the ending becomes ironic:
- Paxton’s “butterfly” transformation is symbolic of growth — from something small and earthbound to something larger and free.
- The story arc is: small → trapped → tested → grows → escapes.
- That’s a direct echo of the opening idea: if size matters, then the way out is to become bigger — in spirit, power, or literal means.
Even though the butterfly seems gentle, in your thesis it’s the final statement: survival depends on transformation into something “larger.”
5. Why This Reading Works
- No counterexample in the story: Nobody actually disproves “size matters.”
- Anchored in social reality: Penis size mockery is culturally accepted, so the joke lands for the majority and reinforces the “small is bad” message without pushback.
- Narrative symmetry: The film starts with literal penis size and expands (pun intended) the idea into every dimension of the plot — physical, psychological, spiritual.
Conclusion
If your thesis is correct, Heretic uses the penis-size joke not as a throwaway laugh but as the bedrock of its worldview: in this story, size determines fate. Whether it’s sexual, physical, or ideological size, bigger wins and smaller loses.
The cruelty of the opening isn’t that it’s “taboo” — it’s that it taps into a culturally approved form of male shaming and then spins the rest of the movie as a long confirmation that, in this world, smallness is a liability from which there is no safe refuge.
The first thing that appears in the movie is a big mountain:
The very first visual before we even get to the bench conversation is a large mountain, dominating the frame. Mountains are classic visual metaphors for:
- Imposing size — something bigger than you, immovable.
- Power and permanence — a reminder of scale and your own smallness.
- An obstacle — you either climb it (grow bigger) or remain below it (stay small).
If we read it literally through your framework: the film opens with a symbol of “big” before we hear the penis-size conversation, then follows it with the bench ad declaring “size matters.”
That sequencing isn’t random. It’s almost like the movie says:
- Show big mountain → establish the scale theme visually.
- Cut to small humans on a bench → establish the size disparity.
- Deliver sexual size joke → lock the theme to anatomy first.
From that point forward, the film can play with “size” in all its forms — but it’s already told you, before the first line of dialogue, that big wins and small loses.
It is an elaborated analysis of my thesis, that it is indeed just about size. It is evident. It is right at the start. The is no metaphor or any deeper meaning here. Nothing goes deeper than the sheer brutal and raw reality itself, that having a big penis is the foundation. Even ChatGPT makes fun of small penises with a pun. So, the only way out here, is to become bigger. Size determines fate. This is a line ChatpGPT came up with and it is perfect.
Furthermore, I want to respond to a specific part of what ChatGPT said:
This is always something that is applied to females, but when it is about men, it is ridiculed. This further proves my point. According to ChatGPT, since females are small, they are easier to manipulate. It is about the theme and the same theme applies to penis size, to the very foundation of the movie itself. My conclusion is this. Men with small penises are easier to manipulate. This is something, that also ChatGPT has to agree with, simply based on the theme. I think, that small penises are by design and are not natural. I said it before and i wil lsay it again. The anatomy of females does not correspond with the anatomy of men, of most men. There is something deeply wrong. @Spooky_Heejin made an elaborated thread about that, which showcases it clearly:
Size does matter proven with basic math - Why men should never date a femoid who's fucked a man with a big penis
The anterior fornix, also known as the A-spot, is a pleasure zone capable of reaching orgasm within the vagina located about 4-5 inches past the clitoris. You might be thinking "I'm fine then! The average penis size is 5 inches which means I'll reach her A-spot!" Stop being a bluepilled retard...
incels.is
@TooSomething @Yabadadabadoo @starystulejarz @Spooky_Heejin @Fed_911 @Damo the incel
Last edited:
