Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

My general theory of politics and culture in the 21st century

World is A is our greatest hope but sadly whe already lost the war and now the juden are working with satan to enslave us and harvest our suffering
:D
 
Normies don't even know about the concept of borders...lol @ the argument going on in this thread.
 
The chances of world A are currently very slim, I won't lie. However, history is very capricious and we don't know what may unfold.

To me, the biggest mystery with world B people was the disconnection between their actions and their ideology. You have extremely smart and energetic inventors or CEOs, who essentially manage their companies in a fascistic and selfish capitalistic style, who publicly embrace extreme anti-racism, blank-slatism, democracy and feminism. I couldn't reconcile the two ("how could a guy as smart as Sergey Brin deny the existence of brain differences between men and women?") until I understood that everything was profoundly linked: only a feminist could invent Google. It is not about a statement of facts, but a statement of world view. Brin defends the cause of women because as an intelligent Jew, he is obligated to do so, not because he truly believes women are equal to men.

I think it was Oswald Spengler, famous for his Decline of the West magnum opus, who inspired me in this regard.

I am curious about why you think that; my dichotomy certain applies to a lot of countries. For instance, France is currently separated into approximately two political currents: a mainstream liberal/leftist pro-technology current, and a fringe reactionary, luddite current where you can find both the biggest concentration of éminences grises and depressed individuals. I had a falling out with most of my ex friends over this; they embraced reactionary politics, Putinism (Putin is, bizarrely, seen as a potential savior by the French far right), etc, when I embraced transhumanism.

I respectfully disagree. I think world A and world B will radicalize and bring in young members in a roughly equal amount in the future. They will never fuse.

Can you elaborate?
 
World A: State, Nation, Law, war, family, religion, conservatism, traditionalism, nationalism, patriotism, anti-semitism, marriage, Russia, René Guénon, Codreanu, Julius Evola, Adolf Hitler, Aleksandr Dugin, Christian Orthodoxy, white nationalism, Iran, Islam, cautiouness, reluctance to change, anti-feminism, anti-capitalism, racism, racialism, hierarchy, alt-right, Richard Spencer, death, heredity, eugenics, art, soul, cemetery, military chaplain, apple pie, roast beef, chimney, wood fire, Luddism, tribunal, gallows, military service, rifle, sword.
>Adolf Hitler
>anti-capitalism

Another politically illiterate?
 
I think World B will certainly win.

The only question is when, but it will certainly happen. If not in this century then in a couple of centuries for sure.
Looks that way
 
>Adolf Hitler
>anti-capitalism

Another politically illiterate?
Adolf Hitler made the industries of Germany work for the needs of the nation, and not for the only interests of single investors like capitalism do today.
 
Wonderful post, you're going to make a great psychologist
 
World A should win, but World B has already won.
World A = Traditionalism
World B = ZOG world reformation
 
World A should win, but World B has already won.
Don’t fret so much. Having Transhumanism in World B is better than anything you could have hoped for out of World A. If it can be effectively realised then most of what you find disagreeable about World B will disappear anyway.
 
Don’t fret so much. Having Transhumanism in World B is better than anything you could have hoped for out of World A. If it can be effectively realised then most of what you find disagreeable about World B will disappear anyway.
Computers and internet are the literal only things i'd salvage from world B
 
Computers and internet are the literal only things i'd salvage from world B
World A is technological stagnation. Women will still not want to marry incels in World A.
 
I am amazed by the majority of incels who prefer world A over world B.

Sure, world A at its apogee would have given you a looksmatched or statusmatched wife, and in this time Chads weren't ruling because religion or poverty crippled them. But world B is the promise of a radically new paradigm where ultimately, you get to choose everything that is imposed as of today. Genes, body parts, brain parts, etc. World B also holds the promise of an actual disappearance of the human race.

I guess most incels hate world B because for now, it promises so much and has delivered so little; but then again, if Ray Kurzweil is right (evidence is that he's always been right with a 10 year delay), we may not need to wait that long to see this evolve.
 
Art shouldnt belong in world A, 99% if not 100% of the most talented and creative artists I've met and know have all been really big liberals, aswell as the majority of musicians, both internationally recognised and just local people I know are all liberals too. Apart from that I agree with you, I think you can see it slowly happening now, for example in the destruction of Confederate monuments and the protests, in a way blood has already been shed in Charlottesville.
 
Art shouldnt belong in world A, 99% if not 100% of the most talented and creative artists I've met and know have all been really big liberals, aswell as the majority of musicians, both internationally recognised and just local people I know are all liberals too. Apart from that I agree with you, I think you can see it slowly happening now, for example in the destruction of Confederate monuments and the protests, in a way blood has already been shed in Charlottesville.
Today art and music really suck however, at least in my opinion. Compare for example the traditionalist Germano-centric Wagner with every globalist popstar like Ed Sheeran or Madonna, who made the best music? The same for art and architecture, just compare the National Socialist Speer or the Fascist Piacentini with Aalto or some other modern architect loved by liberal millennials.
 
Today art and music really suck however, at least in my opinion. Compare for example the traditionalist Germano-centric Wagner with every globalist popstar like Ed Sheeran or Madonna, who made the best music? The same for art and architecture, just compare the National Socialist Speer or the Fascist Piacentini with Aalto or some other modern architect loved by liberal millennials.
A very good point, well made hah.
 
Adolf Hitler made the industries of Germany work for the needs of the nation, and not for the only interests of single investors like capitalism do today.
Another politically illiterate?

That's not capitalism, capitalism is when the means of production are in the hands of private companies or the state, like in Nazi Germany. Also, JFL @ your "capitalism is about the interests of single investors".
 
Another politically illiterate?

That's not capitalism, capitalism is when the means of production are in the hands of private companies or the state, like in Nazi Germany. Also, JFL @ your "capitalism is about the interests of single investors".

The means of production were in the hands of the State even in USSR just like in every communist country like North Korea and so on, so even communism is capitalism now? Just lulz.
 
The means of production were in the hands of the State even in USSR just like in every communist country like North Korea and so on, so even communism is capitalism now? Just lulz.
You are right in something, "just lulz", because yes, you understood me correctly, the USSR, North Korea, Cuba, China and Vietnam were/are all capitalist nations, all of them had a state, money and classes. Communism does not have any of those. Just because they used a bunch of red stars, wouldn't make them any more communist. They were all capitalist countries.
 
You are right in something, "just lulz", because yes, you understood me correctly, the USSR, North Korea, Cuba, China and Vietnam were/are all capitalist nations, all of them had a state, money and classes. Communism does not have any of those. Just because they used a bunch of red stars, wouldn't make them any more communist. They were all capitalist countries.
You're absolutely right if you look at the dicotomy capitalism/communism of 19th and early 20th century. But in the last 50 years it all changed, and today capitalism it's far away different from the one that was a century ago, and the same is for communism.
 
You're absolutely right if you look at the dicotomy capitalism/communism of 19th and early 20th century. But in the last 50 years it all changed, and today capitalism it's far away different from the one that was a century ago, and the same is for communism.
It doesn't work like that, capitalism isn't just this magically different thing now, capitalism was, a 100 years ago, private ownership over the means of production, wage labor and the sale of goods and services in a market, capitalism isn't now any different
 
It doesn't work like that, capitalism isn't just this magically different thing now, capitalism was, a 100 years ago, private ownership over the means of production, wage labor and the sale of goods and services in a market, capitalism isn't now any different
Ok, so are you supporting an economical system that permits to Soros, Rockfeller and other few people to gain more than 90% of world richness while all others can only have the remaining?
 
I can't help but I find this over-seriousness hilarious. Especially that Dugin is secretly a sodomite.
 
Even if transhumanism kicks off and becomes a viable notion it will only be available to the supremely rich. Incels, who are already at the bottom of the pile will not be able to afford the astronomical costs associated with genetic engineering.

Jfl at picking world B unless you are sone sort of magnate or tycoon. World B is basically a hellish Orwellian Jew dystopia where Incels are in the exact same position they were in before except now their satanic Jewish overlords can live for an indefinite period of time vs expiring from natural causes.
 
Last edited:
Even if transhumanism kicks off and becomes a viable notion it will only be available to the supremely rich. Incels, who are already at the bottom of the pile will not be able to afford the astronomical costs associated with genetic engineering.

Jfl at picking world B unless you are sone sort of magnate or tycoon. World B is basically a hellish Orwellian Jew dystopia where Incels are in the exact same position they were in before except now their satanic Jewish overlords can live for an indefinite period of time vs expiring from natural causes.
This.
 
It was always kind of the same, with super-rich 0.01%, wasn't it.
 
Ok, so are you supporting an economical system that permits to Soros, Rockfeller and other few people to gain more than 90% of world richness while all others can only have the remaining?
Didn't we just debate on that other thread about this exact same thing???

I don't "support an economical system", I believe in might-makes-right, and that property is tied to your ability to defend it.

Also, why Soros, he isn't even that rich.
 

Similar threads

logician
Replies
8
Views
153
logician
logician
ItsTrulyOver
Replies
31
Views
418
SuccessfulShark
SuccessfulShark
Nordicel94
Replies
10
Views
289
AlexDelarge
A
Third Eye
Replies
14
Views
399
Third Eye
Third Eye
J
Replies
22
Views
348
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top