Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

My Criticism on Churches

Dr. Butane

Dr. Butane

Baptism by fire
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 24, 2024
Posts
7,225
Online time
1d 3h
A church is a business. Pastors are there to make money. Did you really think they care about volunteering for the people?

Being raised on Christianity, the lukewarm feelgood sermons went nowhere. Screaming and singing and praising a Jew's god, then shaking the donation basket.

Most people congregate at church to virtue signal. They're terrible, judgemental people in real life though.

Don't forget the Bible was written by man, therefore it's a flawed, twisted, and incomplete retelling of a history.
 
In Oriental Orthodoxy, the Clergy are often poorly paid or not salaried at all. Mega-church televangelists is a Western phenomenon.
 
A church is a business. Pastors are there to make money. Did you really think they care about volunteering for the people?

Being raised on Christianity, the lukewarm feelgood sermons went nowhere. Screaming and singing and praising a Jew's god, then shaking the donation basket.

Most people congregate at church to virtue signal. They're terrible, judgemental people in real life though.

Don't forget the Bible was written by man, therefore it's a flawed, twisted, and incomplete retelling of a history.

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/GXRv-TFHCiM?si=UdKXzuv0iFspZ2FP
 
Christcucks ignore half of the Bible but at same time they say entirety of the Bible was inspired by God's will. :feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:

And Catholicism is just pure evil snake/dragon worshipping cult.
Basilisk vatican basilica


Evangelical churches are just as bad, money and status is everything
 
And Catholicism is just pure evil snake/dragon worshipping cult.
If Yaldaboath aka the demiurge was in Ragnarok who would he fight? : r/ShuumatsuNoValkyrie

Evangelical churches are just as bad, money and status is everything

Yep, Evangelists are fake as fuck. The truth is nobody cares about you, and there is no such thing as something for nothing. Look out for yourself.

Another truth: there is more than one God that would actually help you in return for offerings.
 
A church is a business. Pastors are there to make money. Did you really think they care about volunteering for the people?

Being raised on Christianity, the lukewarm feelgood sermons went nowhere. Screaming and singing and praising a Jew's god, then shaking the donation basket.

Most people congregate at church to virtue signal. They're terrible, judgemental people in real life though.

Don't forget the Bible was written by man, therefore it's a flawed, twisted, and incomplete retelling of a history.
As a wise man said ,do not judge the pilot of an airline by the ground crew .

Don't give up on Jesus because some churches suck
 
As a wise man said ,do not judge the pilot of an airline by the ground crew .

Don't give up on Jesus because some churches suck
Ask God for something and time how long it takes for him to give it to you, if at all. Now ask another deity and give offerings and observe instant results.
 
As a wise man said ,do not judge the pilot of an airline by the ground crew .

Don't give up on Jesus because some churches suck
“But the father said to his servants, ‘Quick! Bring the best robe and put it on him. Put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. 23 Bring the fattened calf and kill it. Let’s have a feast and celebrate. 24 For this son of mine was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’ So they began to celebrate.
 
Ask God for something and time how long it takes for him to give it to you, if at all. Now ask another deity and give offerings and observe instant results.
Lol. God doesn't serve you. You serve him.
 
Christcucks ignore half of the Bible but at same time they say entirety of the Bible was inspired by God's will. :feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:

And Catholicism is just pure evil snake/dragon worshipping cult. View attachment 1502365

Evangelical churches are just as bad, money and status is everything
1. Making up symbols and conspiracies about architecture says more about your imagination than theology. If you want to critique Catholicism, at least engage with its doctrine, not YouTube-level fantasy.
2. What do you mean ignore half the Bible? The OT?
 
Last edited:
Lol. God doesn't serve you. You serve him.
Sounds like he likes his good little slaves.

Exodus 34:14
Don’t worship any other god. I am Yahweh Kanah—the jealous Lord. That is my name. I hate for my people to worship other gods.
 
Sounds like he likes his good little slaves.

Exodus 34:14
Don’t worship any other god. I am Yahweh Kanah—the jealous Lord. That is my name. I hate for my people to worship other gods.
Point being?
 
I'll give it a watch
Look, I'm not against you choosing God. It's just tiring how some mainstream religions find it feasible to continue their bloodshed in the name of religion while shunning magick practices and pushing their equally bloody deity as "the one."
 
1. Making up symbols and conspiracies about architecture says more about your imagination than theology. If you want to critique Catholicism, at least engage with its doctrine, not YouTube-level fantasy.
:feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: Someone is completely blind. What a sad pathetic snake worshipper that you are. Tell me even when we ignore that one building what does obelisk symbolises that they have in middle of the St Peter's Square? What about random dragon sculptures and paintings inside Basilica? What about star of Remphan and even Baal can be seen inside of Vatican and their museum? What about Lucifer sarcophagus under the Vatican? Why did previous Pope was attending to Chinese dragon ritual? Why did Vatican let Rome to put Moloch statue at Colosseum?
2. What do you mean ignore half the Bible? The OT?
Ofc the OT and also there are several Books that were not included inside modern Bible as they were inconvenient for the Church.
 
Exodus 34:14
Don’t worship any other god. I am Yahweh Kanah—the jealous Lord. That is my name. I hate for my people to worship other gods.
Yahweh face
That's his face. Looks like angry incel subhuman God, that had also dragon form and was eating virgin foids and hoarded gold.
 

Dr. Justin Sledge is not a theologian. He's a religious studies professor. That means he studies religion as a human phenomenon, like mythology or literature. So when he says YHWH evolved from different models to reach monotheism based on history, that can show when and where people worshiped or how beliefs changed or spread, but he can't use history to disprove revelation. That requires a theological interpretation. He doesn’t engage with the unity of Scripture over 1,500 years, the fulfilled prophecies pointing to Christ, the resurrection of Jesus, or the Church’s survival under empire, heresy, and martyrdom. These are foundational to Christian belief and he ignores them. He also doesn’t do textual criticism, so he’s not weakening the reliability of the Old Testament manuscripts. The verse you sent earlier clearly teaches monotheism and contradicts the claim that it evolved later. His arguments rely on assumptions, not serious engagement with the Bible as revelation.
 
Dr. Justin Sledge is not a theologian. He's a religious studies professor. That means he studies religion as a human phenomenon, like mythology or literature. So when he says YHWH evolved from different models to reach monotheism based on history, that can show when and where people worshiped or how beliefs changed or spread, but he can't use history to disprove revelation. That requires a theological interpretation. He doesn’t engage with the unity of Scripture over 1,500 years, the fulfilled prophecies pointing to Christ, the resurrection of Jesus, or the Church’s survival under empire, heresy, and martyrdom. These are foundational to Christian belief and he ignores them. He also doesn’t do textual criticism, so he’s not weakening the reliability of the Old Testament manuscripts. The verse you sent earlier clearly teaches monotheism and contradicts the claim that it evolved later. His arguments rely on assumptions, not serious engagement with the Bible as revelation.
That's why I asked if you knew him.
 
Look, I'm not against you choosing God. It's just tiring how some mainstream religions find it feasible to continue their bloodshed in the name of religion while shunning magick practices and pushing their equally bloody deity as "the one."
Christianity in modern times and bloodshed...?
 
Ofc the OT and also there are several Books that were not included inside modern Bible as they were inconvenient for the Church.
The Old Testament has always been central to Christianity.
It’s read daily in the liturgies of Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, and Catholic Churches.
Prophecies, Psalms, and the Law are fulfilled in Christ — they’re not discarded.
It's interpreted through Christ:

Animal sacrifices were made for atonement (Leviticus 16) but Christ becomes the once-for-all sacrifice.
"Behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.” (John 1:29)
“We have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” (Hebrews 10:10 )

The Psalms:

Isaiah 53 – The Suffering Servant

“He was pierced for our transgressions… by His wounds we are healed.”
Describes Christ’s Passion and crucifixion perfectly.
Quoted in 1 Peter 2:24
Example: Micah 5:2 — Messiah will be born in Bethlehem
Fulfilled in Matthew 2:1

Example: Zechariah 9:9 — King enters Jerusalem on a donkey
Fulfilled in Matthew 21:5 (Palm Sunday)
 
Iranian strikes on Israel: what happened and why did Iran attack? | Israel  | The Guardian
Two-state solution? Israelis have grown more skeptical | Pew Research Center

Christians haven't been doing any killing lately, their (((masters))) have. Fighting over the same God btw.
“No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.” 1 John 2:23
“You do not know Me or My Father. If you knew Me, you would know My Father also.” John 8:19
“If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I came from God and now am here.” John 8:42
“You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires.” John 8:44
“If you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?” John 5:46–47
“Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.” 1 John 2:22

“In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” 2 Corinthians 4:4

 
“No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.” 1 John 2:23
“You do not know Me or My Father. If you knew Me, you would know My Father also.” John 8:19
“If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I came from God and now am here.” John 8:42
“You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires.” John 8:44
“If you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?” John 5:46–47
“Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.” 1 John 2:22

“In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” 2 Corinthians 4:4

Jews are unbelievers.
 
He doesn’t engage with the unity of Scripture over 1,500 years, the fulfilled prophecies pointing to Christ, the resurrection of Jesus, or the Church’s survival under empire, heresy, and martyrdom. These are foundational to Christian belief and he ignores them.
Genuine miracles can only be recorded. Since he is religious himself, why should he disprove their existence? Who are we to say YHWH didn't already have an agenda to take over the world?
 
While the Old Testament emphasizes God's covenant with the Israelites as a chosen nation, the New Testament introduces the idea of a spiritual chosen people through faith in Jesus Christ, encompassing both Jews and Gentiles.
Butane, bro, you answered it essentially. According to the New Testament, the true people of God are those who believe in Christ - Jew or Gentile - both grafted in the tree of life. Rejecting Him means stepping outside the new covenant, even if you followed or are following the old one. There are parallels that speak for itself in the NT:

“And He marveled because of their unbelief (ἀπιστία, apistía).” Mark 6:6
ἀπιστία (apistía) = disbelief, faithlessness.
Jesus marveled (ἐθαύμαζεν, ethaúmazen) at how little faith His own people had.
“Truly I tell you, with no one in Israel have I found such great faith (πίστιν μεγάλην, pístin megalēn).” Matthew 8:10
πίστις (pístis) = faith, belief.
μεγάλη (megalē) = great, strong, massive.
Jesus marveled (ἐθαύμασεν, ethaúmasen) — same root word — but this time at a Roman centurion, literal Gentile occupier, not a Jew, in front of the very disciples.
God’s people are no longer defined by physical descent or the Mosaic Law, but by faith in Christ, the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets.
“This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.” (Luke 22:20)

The old covenant pointed to Him. That's why the OT is important. To reject Christ is to reject the covenant’s purpose.
Romans 6:23: "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
 
Genuine miracles can only be recorded. Since he is religious himself, why should he disprove their existence? Who are we to say YHWH didn't already have an agenda to take over the world?
1. And your job is to investigate the implications of the recorded miracles. The Gospels were written as eyewitness testimony of God acting in history. What did they mean? Is it true? Has there been textual preservation?
2. If Sledge is going to critique Christian theology, then he needs to address the core claims. But he's an esotericis guy, which brings me to my first point. Philosophical commentary isn’t enough when you’re ignoring the core truth claims of Christianity
3. “For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
9 “As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.

Why would he need to take-over what he created? This is what is the issue. If you want to know who YHWEH is, read the scripture, and examine it theologically.
 
And your job is to investigate the implications of the recorded miracles.
I'm not denying YHWH's existence, maybe some of the recorded miracles are his doing.
Why would he need to take-over what he created? This is what is the issue.
Because he's not really in control. He just fools his followers into thinking that he is with threats of eternities in hell.
 
I'm not denying YHWH's existence, maybe some of the recorded miracles are his doing.

Because he's not really in control. He just fools his followers into thinking that he is with threats of eternities in hell.
You sound like you have interesting views. Look, I don't know anything about Gnosticism and esocentricism. But what's your background?
 
Gnosticism and esocentricism.
Gnostics might be on to something. Suffering is a big part of this reality. Supposedly we are eternal souls stemming from the Universal One and have been sent to this realm to level-up our consciousness. AKA this Earth realm is all a game.
 
Gnostics might be on to something. Suffering is a big part of this reality. Supposedly we are eternal souls stemming from the Universal One and have been sent to this realm to level-up our consciousness. AKA this Earth realm is all a game.
I PM'ed you
 
Being raised on Christianity, the lukewarm feelgood sermons went nowhere. Screaming and singing and praising a Jew's god, then shaking the donation basket.

Most people congregate at church to virtue signal. They're terrible, judgemental people in real life though.

Don't forget the Bible was written by man, therefore it's a flawed, twisted, and incomplete retelling of a history.
These criticisms apply to all organised religions to an extent so how does your religion differ from this?
 
“But the father said to his servants, ‘Quick! Bring the best robe and put it on him. Put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. 23 Bring the fattened calf and kill it. Let’s have a feast and celebrate. 24 For this son of mine was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’ So they began to celebrate.
The return of the prodigal son
 
Ask God for something and time how long it takes for him to give it to you, if at all. Now ask another deity and give offerings and observe instant results.
How so ,and what results
 
These criticisms apply to all organised religions to an extent
What extent. Not all religions are the same but I'm tending to agree that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are under the same God.
how does your religion differ from this?
I'm not religious
 
Church of england has jewish roots and thats why they condemn native brits
Muh church muh christianity
Church of england to deconstruct whiteness thanks kikes


modern churches need to be burned to the fuckin ground

american churches proclaimed saint george floyd and have the full blm version of pride flags hanging next to their stained glass windows
 
That requires me to reveal my work, which I won't. Secrecy in magic.
Ok ,I do believe that you have had success but witchcraft may also back fire and have consequences,so b careful
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top