E
Sex is the root of all evil. It's the reason evil happens. Being evil is all about getting laid. Here's evidence:
Is the Male Sex Drive the Cause of Wars? - Psychology Today
Another study had found that the reason men historically fought in wars was because they worried if they didn't, their wives would cheat on them with other men. this gave them incentive to fight off to war to prevent cuckoldry. There's also some anecdotal and theoretical evidence that jihadists and Islamic terrorists commit terrorist attacks due to sexual frustration because their societies prohibit premarital sex, masturbation and encourage waiting until marriage which won't happen until their mid-late 20s/early 30s. These men commit violence due to feeling emasculated by their virginity and their desire to experience death by suicide bombing so they can experience attractive women in heaven, with the Quran being misinterpreted by them as promising women in heaven. Some anecdotes from Muslim terrorists show they experience sexual frustration over virginity.
Other studies show that physically aggressive men have more sexual partners, and the more physically aggressive he is, the more partners he has. Studies also found that women find physically aggressive men attractive for short-term encounters/flings but not long-term relationships.
Another thread I started earlier is about how studies have shown how criminals have more reproductive partners and how prisoners have more sex partners (not including their prison sex partners/rape victims). Studies have shown a lot of evidence that crime/violence is subconsciously or consciously done to attract female mates and have sex partners. Read more detail there. I have also read research about rapists and how peer pressure to have, the desire to have as many sex partners as possible, and viewing women as conquests, and sexual gratification are the primary motives for rape, shattering the myth that it's only about power over women (that could just be a secondary motive). Rapists have been shown to have consensual sex, and have far more sexual partners than most men and more dating partners. Some studies have shown that among non-pedophilic child molesters (child molesters who aren't attracted to children), they might molest children due to inability to be with an adult partner (such as an adult they are attracted to and wish to but afraid to pursue) so they pick children as a substitute. These are called regressive abusers. Most child molesters are not pedophiles but situational offenders. These child molesters might molest due to insecurity, curiosity, stress, a desire to hurt a loved one of the child, marital problems, sexual experimentation, etc. Studies have also shown that school bullies have more sex partners, and that bullies bully others subconsciously or consciously to get laid and as an effective mating strategy and bullying is part of evolution and a strategy. The only exception to this is that bullying is NOT a mediating effect for extraversion being positively associated with getting laid, showing that extroverts get laid through their extraversion, and that unless you're far more extroverted than average, bullying would be a factor in why you got laid when you engaged in bullying. Studies also show that bullies tend to be popular among their peers (except bully/victims, those who are bullies and victims at the same time. they have low popularity). Bullies tend to get laid more and this is particularly true for boys who physically bully (aka violence). Bullies don't bully due to having a shitty life, or low self-esteem or depression, with studies showing they actually have low insecurity, high self-esteem and low rates of depression. Studies have shown bullying is about increasing social status, and studies show middle/high school bullies bully their friends and people they have mutual friends with far more than they bully non-friends, and that outcasts are just as likely to be bullies as popular people. the study found people bully those with the same social status as them to increase their own social status. this makes sense, as relational bullying becomes more common in middle/high school than elementary school (elementary has more physical bullies) and people engage in gossip or character assassination to lower others' social status and increase their own. This explains why studies show that among popular people, the #1 most popular person is the nicest whereas ones who aren't are more likely to be bullies. So now you can see bullying is part of evolution. Men act violence towards other men to get laid, and once they achieve mating success, the likelihood drops. Adult virgins usually engage in less risk-taking behaviors, and are more likely to be bullied/socially withdrawn or rejected by peers when growing up. In adulthood, they tend to be in poorer physical/mental health and are less satisifed with their social lives. They also are more likely to be obese, and bullying victims are more likely to be overweight throughout adulthood. This is line with the fact that the vast majority of people on this forum were bullied growing up. A fair amount of users on this forum here and there were even bullied in adulthood.
TLDR: Sex is the root of all evil, war, violence and crime in this world, especially if perpetrated by men. Feminists complain that men are violent, but women cause men to be violent and reward them with sex for that. So this is why society long ago tried to restrict sex, but if terrorists in Islam are terrorists due to sexual frustration, then that means that restricting sex was a double edge sword but so is the sexual revolution when it tries to permit sex, an activity that is the #1 cause of war/violence. Both have consequences, and eliminating sex from this world would be much better because evolution wouldn't be as pronounced in this world. Women also cause toxic masculinity by putting pressure on men to conform to as many macho stereotypes as possible (assertive, confident, stoic, doesn't cry, never insecure, sexually experienced, taller than me, stronger than me, dominant, etc.) Maybe if women didn't exist, men wouldn't be the way they are because sex wouldn't be part of producing children and evolution wouldn't be as important. The simultaneous existence of sexual intercourse/sexual activity and two sexes (male and female) causes the worst issues on Earth, like war, crime and violence. Eliminate one of the two (or even both) to stop this from happening. Fuck everything, just annihilate humanity. Blow up Earth too so evolution doesn't start again. Turns out that thugmaxxing is a useful thing.
@Mainländer @ThoughtfulCel thoughts?
Is the Male Sex Drive the Cause of Wars? - Psychology Today
'Wars caused by male sex drive,' says scientists - The Independent
The Cause of All War Boils Down to Sex and Social Status: Here's Why - Business Insider
Is male libido the ultimate cause of war? - Research Digest
So looking at hot women and their legs makes men more prone to war but not national flags or anything. and male warriors in traditional tribal societies alongside male gang members have more sex partners (and the study cited showed that gang leaders have the most partners).
Another study had found that the reason men historically fought in wars was because they worried if they didn't, their wives would cheat on them with other men. this gave them incentive to fight off to war to prevent cuckoldry. There's also some anecdotal and theoretical evidence that jihadists and Islamic terrorists commit terrorist attacks due to sexual frustration because their societies prohibit premarital sex, masturbation and encourage waiting until marriage which won't happen until their mid-late 20s/early 30s. These men commit violence due to feeling emasculated by their virginity and their desire to experience death by suicide bombing so they can experience attractive women in heaven, with the Quran being misinterpreted by them as promising women in heaven. Some anecdotes from Muslim terrorists show they experience sexual frustration over virginity.
Other studies show that physically aggressive men have more sexual partners, and the more physically aggressive he is, the more partners he has. Studies also found that women find physically aggressive men attractive for short-term encounters/flings but not long-term relationships.
Another thread I started earlier is about how studies have shown how criminals have more reproductive partners and how prisoners have more sex partners (not including their prison sex partners/rape victims). Studies have shown a lot of evidence that crime/violence is subconsciously or consciously done to attract female mates and have sex partners. Read more detail there. I have also read research about rapists and how peer pressure to have, the desire to have as many sex partners as possible, and viewing women as conquests, and sexual gratification are the primary motives for rape, shattering the myth that it's only about power over women (that could just be a secondary motive). Rapists have been shown to have consensual sex, and have far more sexual partners than most men and more dating partners. Some studies have shown that among non-pedophilic child molesters (child molesters who aren't attracted to children), they might molest children due to inability to be with an adult partner (such as an adult they are attracted to and wish to but afraid to pursue) so they pick children as a substitute. These are called regressive abusers. Most child molesters are not pedophiles but situational offenders. These child molesters might molest due to insecurity, curiosity, stress, a desire to hurt a loved one of the child, marital problems, sexual experimentation, etc. Studies have also shown that school bullies have more sex partners, and that bullies bully others subconsciously or consciously to get laid and as an effective mating strategy and bullying is part of evolution and a strategy. The only exception to this is that bullying is NOT a mediating effect for extraversion being positively associated with getting laid, showing that extroverts get laid through their extraversion, and that unless you're far more extroverted than average, bullying would be a factor in why you got laid when you engaged in bullying. Studies also show that bullies tend to be popular among their peers (except bully/victims, those who are bullies and victims at the same time. they have low popularity). Bullies tend to get laid more and this is particularly true for boys who physically bully (aka violence). Bullies don't bully due to having a shitty life, or low self-esteem or depression, with studies showing they actually have low insecurity, high self-esteem and low rates of depression. Studies have shown bullying is about increasing social status, and studies show middle/high school bullies bully their friends and people they have mutual friends with far more than they bully non-friends, and that outcasts are just as likely to be bullies as popular people. the study found people bully those with the same social status as them to increase their own social status. this makes sense, as relational bullying becomes more common in middle/high school than elementary school (elementary has more physical bullies) and people engage in gossip or character assassination to lower others' social status and increase their own. This explains why studies show that among popular people, the #1 most popular person is the nicest whereas ones who aren't are more likely to be bullies. So now you can see bullying is part of evolution. Men act violence towards other men to get laid, and once they achieve mating success, the likelihood drops. Adult virgins usually engage in less risk-taking behaviors, and are more likely to be bullied/socially withdrawn or rejected by peers when growing up. In adulthood, they tend to be in poorer physical/mental health and are less satisifed with their social lives. They also are more likely to be obese, and bullying victims are more likely to be overweight throughout adulthood. This is line with the fact that the vast majority of people on this forum were bullied growing up. A fair amount of users on this forum here and there were even bullied in adulthood.
TLDR: Sex is the root of all evil, war, violence and crime in this world, especially if perpetrated by men. Feminists complain that men are violent, but women cause men to be violent and reward them with sex for that. So this is why society long ago tried to restrict sex, but if terrorists in Islam are terrorists due to sexual frustration, then that means that restricting sex was a double edge sword but so is the sexual revolution when it tries to permit sex, an activity that is the #1 cause of war/violence. Both have consequences, and eliminating sex from this world would be much better because evolution wouldn't be as pronounced in this world. Women also cause toxic masculinity by putting pressure on men to conform to as many macho stereotypes as possible (assertive, confident, stoic, doesn't cry, never insecure, sexually experienced, taller than me, stronger than me, dominant, etc.) Maybe if women didn't exist, men wouldn't be the way they are because sex wouldn't be part of producing children and evolution wouldn't be as important. The simultaneous existence of sexual intercourse/sexual activity and two sexes (male and female) causes the worst issues on Earth, like war, crime and violence. Eliminate one of the two (or even both) to stop this from happening. Fuck everything, just annihilate humanity. Blow up Earth too so evolution doesn't start again. Turns out that thugmaxxing is a useful thing.
@Mainländer @ThoughtfulCel thoughts?
