Discussion Most SMV ratings are subjective and have no mathematical basis.

[Moroccancel]

From the WheatWaffles normie to many ratings seen and to be seen on Looksmax.org and elsewhere, I have realized that there is no reliable rating beyond the subjectivism that can be read.

Yeah, clearly you can tell a chad is going to mog an incel to infinity by comparison, and you still see the contrast to a normie, but the ability to measure accurately is practically non-existent. Will AIs be able to help us in this regard?

 

[proudweeb]

Interesting concept. It likely could be measured mathematically - chin dimensions, eye dimensions ("hunter eyes"), ratios etc

 

[Belzebu]

You just need to see 3 things, jaw/chin, eyes and height, other things like hair for example will be important if the first 3 are normie tiers.

 

[BataviaCel]

You just need to see 3 things, jaw/chin, eyes and height, other things like hair for example will be important if the first 3 are normie tiers.

no

 

[Belzebu]

no

Yes for 90% of cases

 

[BataviaCel]

Yes for 90% of cases

you didnt mention maxillary projection, browridge, nose, and other shit. you dont know what youre talking about

 

[Moroccancel]

You just need to see 3 things, jaw/chin, eyes and height, other things like hair for example will be important if the first 3 are normie tiers.

Yes, I understand that these factors are extremely relevant, it is water. However, a computer program and a mathematical base based on the statistics reported from the scientific blackpill would be needed to come up with a formulation and mathematical results and precise. Even more so when you want to give numerical rates, beyond "normie tier" or "incel tier" or "Chad tier". Especially when many venture to say "5, 4, 2, 9...".

For practical purposes, only the ends appear well defined, but not the highest parts of the Guassian bell.

 

[Chingaquedito]

true

 

[Chingaquedito]

I don't need someone else to rate my face to know that I'm ugly as fuck, only fakecels ask for ratings