Genetics_subhuman
Gender segregation
-
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2024
- Posts
- 1,036
“UNIVERSAL FORMULA OF SEX
Sex in human life is the attraction of two (less often several) people to each other and their subsequent copulation to receive sensual pleasure or conceive a surplus product (child). Access control to sex always belongs to a woman, as the owner of innate means of production.In past centuries, society fairly distributed sexual and reproductive resources, allowing men to control and dispose of women's joint ventures: therefore, in most cases, one woman belonged to one man (husband) all her life, sex was considered legal only after marriage and was used exclusively for personal consumption between two people - husband and wife. At the same time, almost any man, regardless of his social status and status, had the opportunity and right to have sex and procreation.
With the development of capitalism and the division of labor, as well as in view of the fall of patriarchy, sex began to play an increasingly important role as a service produced for exchange (sale). Sex becomes a universal form of industrial relations, developing and growing into vaginal capital - the main production relationship that characterizes the essence of the vaginal capitalist mode of production.
Sex appears to us as something dual: as consumer value and exchange value, thus, sex is the main starting point on which the understanding of vaginal capitalist economy depends and needs mathematical expression.
Collapse
Working on "Vaginocapital", we deduced the Universal formula of sex:
U = Ugame + Usex + Umam
Utility (U) is utilitarianism, usefulness of action, simply put, something that tells a woman whether she will give sex to a man. The higher the U, the higher the probability of sex. The subjective usefulness of such action (U) depends on four parameters: confidence in success (Expectancy,E), the intended reward from the man (Value,V), the deadline until the completion of work (Delay,D) and the level of delay (inverse to increasing impatience, G). We calculate the desire of choice for the subject:
U = E * V/G * D
! Time values G and D should not be confused.G - a value comparable to patience in stimulating the point of the same name, practically giving a woman no chance to retreat. D - a value related to long-term waiting, comparable to standing in a long queue, from which sometimes suddenly you want to leave.
Enter three variables for U:
Ugame (play);
Usex (sex);
Umam (sex+conception).
Ugame is a game that is initially used by a woman to choose men to get "chichtyaks":
Ugame = E game * V/G * D
Egame - confidence in receiving money, services, adoration, promotion from a man or society around.
V - monetary services;
D - how soon a woman will get them;
G is a woman's patience.
USex - subjective utility to a woman from sex with a selected man:
Usex = (Esex + IncRang) * V/G * D
Esex - a woman's confidence in the desire to have sex with a chosen man;
IncRang - rank of a man;
V - quality of sex;
D - how soon a woman will get it;
G is the degree of wetness similar to the level of delay (G), inverse to the increasing impatience of the woman from the first formula.
Umam is the desire of a woman to be a child from the chosen man, even if he does not stay with her:
Umam = Emam * V/G * D
Emam - a woman's confidence in the coolness of the future child from the chosen partner;
V - histocompatibility complex (similarity);
G - how much a woman is ready to wait;
D - how soon a man will be able to conceive;
For each U, it is possible to introduce the concept of comparison (comp). If the average level of men around an individual woman was always high, her tolerance for men decreases, accordingly, the level of demand for them increases: U = E * V - comp/G * V, where comp is a comparison, the average level of men around a woman at the moment.
In addition, for the Umam case, it often happens that a woman wants a child from a certain man simply because he is different from others: a scientist among gopniks or a gopnik among scientists, a blond among brunettes or vice versa. In this case, it is advisable to introduce the concept of strange, and Umam in this case will be calculated as follows:
Umam= Emam * V - comp - (+-) strang/G * V
or by module:Umam = Emam * V - comp + |strang|/G * V
The module in this case is revealed as follows: if there are few resources around, then the strangest person is searched for and there will be a plus. If there is a lot, you are looking for the usual alpha, and therefore there will be a minus.
In the last two cases, we can now safely mix alpha, beta, omezhka, kolkhoz woman and beauty and calculate the probability of sex between them, for example:
- Alfach is a muscular handsome city man from Moscow and a slender fat cohoss;
3. Omezhka and the collective farmer;
4. In the crotch and the beauty;
5. Beta and the collective farmer;
6. Beta and beauty;
and for all 6 cases, calculate the total U!
This formula already to some extent eliminates all the illusions that humanity, fooled by feminism, is still delirious with. The general formula of sex is only the first starting point in our "Vaginocapital", but, without a doubt, together with others, it will serve as a reliable foundation in building a mathematical model of a future fair anti-vaginocapitalist society!”
“
THE RIGHT TO SEX
Modern leftists and feminists have a bourgeois normative approach to understanding the theory of law. They have a superficial and mechanistic understanding of the availability of rights. The presence of a particular right in the law is not yet a guarantee that a person will have a real opportunity to exercise this right. The Marxist concept of law is based on the real concept of law, rights must be guaranteed, not declared. The guarantee of rights is carried out with the help of the economic system and political system: socialism and the dictatorship of the proletariat. This is a real theory of law, in which all workers are guaranteed and are actually granted all the rights reflected in the laws. Under capitalism, rights are simply reflected in laws, and citizens themselves must achieve their implementation, the state does not owe anyone anything, it did not ask you to give birth and be born.
But the Marxist theory does not take into account the sexual need of men and the natural monopoly of women on the admission of men to sex (sexual selection). This monopoly of women, given to them by the biological fact of having a vagina and the fact of the sexual need of men, which women can strengthen, stimulate, manipulate (elementarily by undressing). If women's rights to sexual selection are not limited, this will in practice mean that women will deprive up to 95% of men they will consider sexually unattractive of sex, and will give sex only to 5% or so of the most beautiful and physically developed men. That's how it works in nature.In Marx's time, this problem was leveled by religion: Christianity proclaimed the concept of "every creature - a couple" and implemented it through monogamous marriage and a ban on divorce for women. The bourgeois state in the early phase forced women to marry economically. Therefore, the poor Marx, who did not work anywhere and lived on the donations of the rich major Engels, could not even imagine that sex could be inaccessible to someone: he himself had a wife, provided to the atheist Marx with the entire preceding period of Christian religiosity, who brought up in women a sense of duty regarding marriage. But with the development of feminism and leftism, feminists have destroyed religion and family, the institution of marriage is destroyed, it no longer guarantees men's access to sex. Women are financially independent, nothing forces them to look for marriage with a man (except greed and thirst for more profit, of course). That's why women all want sex in crowds only with handsome alpha or rich people, and most men are considered worthless assholes who do not deserve the right to sex and reproduction. Leftists and women support them in this and tell men that men have no right to have sex, and if men want sex, they should either jerk off or become faggots.
We don't agree with that. Therefore, we believe that the right to sexual selection of women should be limited by society in order to protect the right of men to have sex. The right to sex is based on the existence of a sexual need, which exists objectively and the satisfaction of which is necessary for the mental and physical health of a person, the harmonious development of a person and society, human happiness. The implementation of sexual selection by women on the basis of their sexual instincts leads to inequality among men in society and generates the arbitrariness of women. Restricting women's right to sexual selection is not violence against them, but on the contrary, helping them, because due to their instincts, biology and psychology, women themselves are not capable of correct and fair sexual selection. They need help by choosing for them in cases where they are not capable of it themselves. This is the real exercise of the right to sex, both for men and for women themselves. Without limiting their right to sexual selection, most women will wait for the prince until old age and will not get any man and any sex in the end, they will become mentally ill lesbians and feminists. And limiting their right to sexual selection will give them sex with a man. It benefits everyone, the whole society. It's fair and right.
Leftists and feminists attribute to us their perverted fantasies about violence, beatings, rapes of women who do not want to give sex to wonderful decent guys. As for the fantasies of feminists about beatings and other BDSM fantasies that they attribute to us, we can say that feminists, as a rule, are mentally ill women, which is why they are lesbians, they have psychological traumas, complexes related to men. But they proclaim their disease as the "norm" and consider all normal men and women abnormal.
Feminists and leftists proceed from the false thesis that sex is something unpleasant, unnecessary, harmful for women, needed only by men, and even then not all, but "heterosexual perverts", "normal" men, that is, faggots and wankers (as they now call the latter, "asexuals") do not want sex. This is a false thesis from which the women build all their theories, which in the end also turn out to be false.
Women need sex, just like men. The nature of sexuality in women is somewhat different from male sexuality. But this is not a reason to announce that women do not need sex. Sex for women is necessary, and necessary for therapeutic purposes, to ensure their physical and mental health, without sex they turn into fucking femosexuals and lesbians. Sex is something like medicine for them. If a person is sick and does not want to take medicine, is it violent if he is given this medicine forcibly? No, it's not, because it's done in his own interests. When he recovers and thinks freely, and not under the influence of illness, he will agree with it himself and thank him for his help. It's the same with sex. If a woman is not "distributed" for sex with a decent, beautiful guy, she will sit until old age and wait for the "prince", it is in her defective nature and in the monkey instincts of sexual selection, women in the course of evolution could not get rid of it. Therefore, in all centuries they were forcibly married, by the will of their parents. Now we must get rid of the subjectivism of parents, who also distributed unfairly, and in order to find the richest groom. It is necessary to distribute men and women fairly, based on their psychological and sexual compatibility, which will be revealed by psychologists in schoolchildren at the age of 11 - 13, and from the age of 13 couples will be formed and will have sex, for this purpose, sex rooms will be created in schools. That's how it will work. From childhood, people will have sex, which will provide humanity with happiness and harmony, health in all aspects. This is the real provision of the human right to sex.”
Инцел - Антифем
Антифеминистский Левый Фронт. Инцел. Сексуальность. Духовность.
incel-antifem.livejournal.com





