
Lv99_BixNood
fascel
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2017
- Posts
- 21,430
10%
1. Rices -------------------> 2. curries ----> ?
they're not actual self-haters for the most part. just a bunch of virtue signalers.Probably whites due to self hating ones with white guilt
Probably whites due to self hating ones with white guilt
Yeah, I noticed that long ago. White liberals still think they're the best, most advanced, most progressive, morally righteous, and other races are uncultured subhumans, just stated in politically correctthey're not actual self-haters for the most part. just a bunch of virtue signalers.
Nah rices definitely hate themselves the most. Just look at noodlewhores and their outdating rate, many rice parents in the west actually WANT them to marry white and "upgrade their genes". And they give their children retarded English names they don't even know the meaning of, not even curries do that @pyromancer1234Curries definitely hate themselves more than Rice. Honestly, I'd say Rices' self-hatred is a bit overstated, they do get eyelid surgeries and other stuff done to look as white as possible whenever they can, but it's not like a lot of other nonwhites don't do that as well, just look at how popular skin whitening creams are basically everywhere outside of Europe. It's just different for Rices since they are frequently pale skinned as well, so they have to focus on surgeries.
Where Rices have it better than other ethnics though, is that they seem less desperate for white approval and acknowledgment than many other ethnics, just look at how crazy Iranians have gone over Ed Sheeran for that Azizam song. Hard to imagine Chinese or Japanese doing that, and the latter are the only ethnics I've seen really being racist to whites in a "You are stupid monkeys and we are smarter than you," type of way, whereas other nonwhites just cry about being oppressed and call whites evil (but never inferior
.)
Curries >>> More self-hating Sands = Darker Latinos > Rices > Less self-hating Sands = Whiter Latinos > Whites (at least some white guilt is thankfully just performative and the rest get drowned out by the non-self hating ones.)
if only @Devoteecel knew.Yeah, I noticed that long ago. White liberals still think they're the best, most advanced, most progressive, morally righteous, and other races are uncultured subhumans, just stated in politically correctmumbo jumbo.
Curries definitely hate themselves more than Rice. Honestly, I'd say Rices' self-hatred is a bit overstated, they do get eyelid surgeries and other stuff done to look as white as possible whenever they can, but it's not like a lot of other nonwhites don't do that as well, just look at how popular skin whitening creams are basically everywhere outside of Europe. It's just different for Rices since they are frequently pale skinned as well, so they have to focus on surgeries.
Where Rices have it better than other ethnics though, is that they seem less desperate for white approval and acknowledgment than many other ethnics, just look at how crazy Iranians have gone over Ed Sheeran for that Azizam song. Hard to imagine Chinese or Japanese doing that, and the latter are the only ethnics I've seen really being racist to whites in a "You are stupid monkeys and we are smarter than you," type of way, whereas other nonwhites just cry about being oppressed and call whites evil (but never inferior
.)
Curries >>> More self-hating Sands = Darker Latinos > Rices > Less self-hating Sands = Whiter Latinos > Whites (at least some white guilt is thankfully just performative and the rest get drowned out by the non-self hating ones.)
Probably whites due to self hating ones with white guilt
Obviously. They all move to fully white neighborhood right after calling everyone racistthey're not actual self-haters for the most part. just a bunch of virtue signalers.
Eh, i disagree- I think you're understating it especially since you don't live in the West & don't see how it is fully here.Whites (at least some white guilt is thankfully just performative and the rest get drowned out by the non-self hating ones.)
Agree. Most cultures are male-valued and seek to acquire foreign women. Asian culture is uniquely cucked: it's female-valued and does nothing but defect to foreign men. Asian parents themselves support WMAF and drag AMWF. To them (and mostly to the dominating mother), a WM son-in-law represents successful a successful trade of female capital to White adjacency, while a WF daughter-in-law represents a woman who will lead the captured male capital of Asian sons astray.Nah rices definitely hate themselves the most. Just look at noodlewhores and their outdating rate, many rice parents in the west actually WANT them to marry white and "upgrade their genes". And they give their children retarded English names they don't even know the meaning of, not even curries do that @pyromancer1234
Asian women hate Asian men so much it's unreal. Whether abroad in the West or at home in native Asia, it's the same story. They are rabidly obsessed with blue-eyed men and blue-eyed babies. They'd give birth to fully White children if they could...wait, they do now. Their efforts to blot out their own genes would leave Hitler speechless. They've gone from being honorary Aryans to being artificial wombs for actual Aryans.What?
Slant women are the only ones on the planet actively trying to demographically replace themselves.
They do everything in their power to avoid reproducing with a native, and instead make mutts with sexpats.
While simultaneously tanking the birthrate.
Hard data shows Asian women outmarry at 40%, a higher rate than any other demographic. And that's just marriage alone. We can easily observe that outdating is more like 90%. The obvious conclusion is that easily half of all AMAF marriages are Asian women bananaranging back to Asian men after they've had their fun, bringing with them middle-aged demands and a 400% elevated STD rate.idk about races but i know about certain groups
Most self hating group by a mile = noodlewhores, pancake face, ass, titties, and has a shitty screechy singing voice
2nd most self hating group = black american men. they want non-black foids if they can get one. they beat themselves up and hate being black
far distant third = latinas. some of them make wetback jokes and date/marry asian, white, or black men. anywhere from 10-17% of them.
either tied or 4th place = curry men. desperately want white foids.
“This was shocking,” said Hahm, “It was so much higher than the males.”
No shit, Sherlock. (Professor Hahm is herself an Asian woman carrying a White name.)“Asian and Pacific Islander women also have broader interracial dating patterns than Asian American men. This might explain why these women are exposed to higher rates of STDs.”
Jfl at the article on that bitch spawning a full white.Agree. Most cultures are male-valued and seek to acquire foreign women. Asian culture is uniquely cucked: it's female-valued and does nothing but defect to foreign men. Asian parents themselves support WMAF and drag AMWF. To them (and mostly to the dominating mother), a WM son-in-law represents successful a successful trade of female capital to White adjacency, while a WF daughter-in-law represents a woman who will lead the captured male capital of Asian sons astray.
Asian women hate Asian men so much it's unreal. Whether abroad in the West or at home in native Asia, it's the same story. They are rabidly obsessed with blue-eyed men and blue-eyed babies. They'd give birth to fully White children if they could...wait, they do now. Their efforts to blot out their own genes would leave Hitler speechless. They've gone from being honorary Aryans to being artificial wombs for actual Aryans.
Hard data shows Asian women outmarry at 40%, a higher rate than any other demographic. And that's just marriage alone. We can easily observe that outdating is more like 90%. The obvious conclusion is that easily half of all AMAF marriages are Asian women bananaranging back to Asian men after they've had their fun, bringing with them middle-aged demands and a 400% elevated STD rate.
No shit, Sherlock. (Professor Hahm is herself an Asian woman carrying a White name.)
they're not actual self-haters for the most part. just a bunch of virtue signalers.
Yes noodlewhores are extremely low down.Agree. Most cultures are male-valued and seek to acquire foreign women. Asian culture is uniquely cucked: it's female-valued and does nothing but defect to foreign men. Asian parents themselves support WMAF and drag AMWF. To them (and mostly to the dominating mother), a WM son-in-law represents successful a successful trade of female capital to White adjacency, while a WF daughter-in-law represents a woman who will lead the captured male capital of Asian sons astray.
Asian women hate Asian men so much it's unreal. Whether abroad in the West or at home in native Asia, it's the same story. They are rabidly obsessed with blue-eyed men and blue-eyed babies. They'd give birth to fully White children if they could...wait, they do now. Their efforts to blot out their own genes would leave Hitler speechless. They've gone from being honorary Aryans to being artificial wombs for actual Aryans.
Hard data shows Asian women outmarry at 40%, a higher rate than any other demographic. And that's just marriage alone. We can easily observe that outdating is more like 90%. The obvious conclusion is that easily half of all AMAF marriages are Asian women bananaranging back to Asian men after they've had their fun, bringing with them middle-aged demands and a 400% elevated STD rate.
No shit, Sherlock. (Professor Hahm is herself an Asian woman carrying a White name.)
i c baj forsenBlobany 3 digit IQ curry would be self hating. Every single one of them who didn't grow up in the west is either retarded, narcissistic or incredibly submissive.
Why are ethnics( and even whites ) that are westernized buffedany 3 digit IQ curry would be self hating. Every single one of them who didn't grow up in the west is either retarded, narcissistic or incredibly submissive.