Most people don't seem to understand what a 1/10 is

[Deleted member 7448]

A 1/10 isn't a deformed freak with 1 eye and burns on his face. That's simply not on the scale, it doesn't count.

You are not a 3/10 or a 6/10. I've seen some people both here and robots on r9k (which is now degenerate and normie central for some reason) claim they're X/10. No, you're not.

We are 1/10. It doesn't matter if there are flaws you could improve, like being fat and fixing that through gymcelling, fixing your teeth etc...

Don't delude yourself into thinking you are a 4/10. Males alternate between 9/10 (chad), 7/10 chad-lite, 5/10 (normie that had 5 girlfriends by the time he's 21), 3/10 beta cuck that managed to beta himself into getting a bitchy gf that cheats on him. And incels, the realists, the ones who swallowed the blackpill.

 

[IsolationHurts]

Lot of people here are not even ugly

 

[Mik_TFL]

The x/10 scale is stupid, it isn't objective at all, the percentage scale on the other hand is. I am at 2% within my local area, there is no unambiguity there, 98% or males in my age range are more attractive within a 10 mile radius

 

[takERisks]

A 1/10 isn't a deformed freak with 1 eye and burns on his face. That's simply not on the scale, it doesn't count.

You are not a 3/10 or a 6/10. I've seen some people both here and robots on r9k (which is now degenerate and normie central for some reason) claim they're X/10. No, you're not.

We are 1/10. It doesn't matter if there are flaws you could improve, like being fat and fixing that through gymcelling, fixing your teeth etc...

Don't delude yourself into thinking you are a 4/10. Males alternate between 9/10 (chad), 7/10 chad-lite, 5/10 (normie that had 5 girlfriends by the time he's 21), 3/10 beta cuck that managed to beta himself into getting a bitchy gf that cheats on him. And incels, the realists, the ones who swallowed the blackpill.

 

[Limerencel]

There are a lot of mentalcels on this forum. I guess it's better than being a 1/10 deformcel.. but in the end the success rate with femoids is about the same

 

[TheRealChincel]

 

[Fontaine]

So, we're even uglier than we think?

 

[_wifebeater_]

Lot of people here are not even ugly

In foids eyes they are.

 

[TheRealChincel]

In foids eyes they are.

Yes, we're all Steve Buscemi or Dan Schneider to them.

 

[Dekim]

I'm not sure if op is low IQ, or just trying to further lower everyone's esteem

 

[Mainländer]

I kinda agree with OP tbh.

1/10 (or 0/10, depending on how you set the minimum rate) doesn't mean you're the worst aberration ever, it just means you're universally unattractive. I'd rate blackops2incel for example as a 1/10, there' absolutely no redeeming features on his face.

If you showed blackops2incel's pic to 100 random foids, all of them would think he's unattractive and undesirable. But it doesn't mean he's rock bottom at all, he could get worse through plenty of ways (deformity, asymmetry, acid face, burns, cystic acne, etc).

I rate myself as a 3 because there are SOME good stuff and nothing bad enough to destroy everything. I think out of 100 foids, about 30 would consider myself TOLERABLE-looking for a betabuxx cuck if rich or something.

 

[Weirdcel]

So, we're even uglier than we think?

60% of men are 2/10s or less in the eyes of women. Yeah.

 

[LebaneseCel]

People generally think they are much more attractive than they really are IRL. OP is fully right about this.

 

[Heightframeface]

The x/10 scale is stupid, it isn't objective at all, the percentage scale on the other hand is. I am at 2% within my local area, there is no unambiguity there, 98% or males in my age range are more attractive within a 10 mile radius

High IQ post. Looks rating scales are entirely subjective and foolish. Percentiles are a better way of judging attractiveness.

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

Yeah, personally I always hated the "only seriously deformed guys can be 1/10" argument.

1/10 just means you're at the far left side of the bell curve. The bottom 1 or 2 percent or so. Seriously deformed guys are only like 0.01 percent of the general population. Too insignificant to dedicate an entire rating level to.

The equivalent would be saying prime Sean O'pry can't be a 10/10 because prime lachowski is better.

 

[Evildoer]

Somewhat logical, deformed ones would be rather 0/10, not completely out of the scale.

 

[fred_herbert]

We should adopt a -1 to +1 scale.

-1 incel
0 avg / normie
+1 chad

Or a -10 to + 10 scale which represents the amount of effort women will put in in order to date / fuck the guy in question.

With -10 meaning they will do anything possible in order to get as far away from him.
0, neutral, they will put in 0 effort.
+10 they will do anything in their power in order to get to fuck him.

 

[big nose bug eyes]

I kinda agree with OP tbh.

1/10 (or 0/10, depending on how you set the minimum rate) doesn't mean you're the worst aberration ever, it just means you're universally unattractive. I'd rate blackops2incel for example as a 1/10, there' absolutely no redeeming features on his face.

If you showed blackops2incel's pic to 100 random foids, all of them would think he's unattractive and undesirable. But it doesn't mean he's rock bottom at all, he could get worse through plenty of ways (deformity, asymmetry, acid face, burns, cystic acne, etc).

I rate myself as a 3 because there are SOME good stuff and nothing bad enough to destroy everything. I think out of 100 foids, about 30 would consider myself TOLERABLE-looking for a betabuxx cuck if rich or something.

good post

 

[Evildoer]

We should adopt a -1 to +1 scale.

-1 incel
0 avg / normie
+1 chad

Looks is a spectrum, not really a good scale.

Or a -10 to + 10 scale which represents the amount of effort women will put in in order to date / fuck the guy in question.

With -10 meaning they will do anything possible in order to get as far away from him.
0, neutral, they will put in 0 effort.
+10 they will do anything in their power in order to get to fuck him.

This looks quite good, tbh tbh. But femoid actions is hard to predict from time to time, as they're highly hormonal, so we can't predict how much of an effort she will put to get a man she desires. Traditional look scale is still better as, man's level of attractiveness is highly predictable, overall.

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

We should adopt a -1 to +1 scale.

-1 incel
0 avg / normie
+1 chad

Or a -10 to + 10 scale which represents the amount of effort women will put in in order to date / fuck the guy in question.

With -10 meaning they will do anything possible in order to get as far away from him.
0, neutral, they will put in 0 effort.
+10 they will do anything in their power in order to get to fuck him.

Good idea.

 

[Deleted member 1252]

The reality is that the male attractiveness scale isn’t X/10, it’s X/3:

0: incel
1: normie
2: chadlite
3: chad

This is how femoids rank males.