Halfcastking123
Greycel
★
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2026
- Posts
- 7
- Online time
- 9m 52s
Religiouscels dnr
ok GrAY.Religiouscels dnr
Its not wrongIf morality does not exist, on what basis would you say it is wrong for someone to harm you or take something that belongs to you?
Exactly, it isn't objectively wrong. Perhaps on a personal level you feel wronged but your feelings are not fact.Its not wrong
100%Exactly, it isn't objectively wrong. Perhaps on a personal level you feel wronged but your feelings are not fact.
Ethics and politics largely get solved if you realize that morality is fake and gay.
Its not wrong
its not wrong per say. Morality is a social construct. the strong get stronger the weak get weaker
Morality isn’t objective but it’s still realthat is true, but there is a reason 'morals' differ per country, per religion, per ethnicity etc.
that is true, but there is a reason 'morals' differ per country, per religion, per ethnicity etc.
Morality is still a man-made term. Does it exist? It all depends on how you define it and how you explain it
Because it would effect me negatively. That doesnt make it morally wrong, I can still feel emptions like empathy, happiness, sadness etc.If it is not wrong, then why object to it at all when it happens to you, rather than treating it as no different from any other neutral event?
Because suffering harm is bad for you. The action of causing harm isn't bad.If it is not wrong, then why object to it at all when it happens to you, rather than treating it as no different from any other neutral event?





