Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Modern world was inevitable

znbox

znbox

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Posts
429
It's a long post about my thoughts on history, religion and the world of today.

I hear a lot that this period of time is the worst for men but I don't know if I agree with that. If I lived 500 years ago, I would be dead as an infant with 50% possibility, killed by war, killed by famine or disease. And if I survive I'd probably lived a lame life working on a field to die at 30.

But the thread isn't about that. The more I read history the more I see the inevitability of any event. For example, Hitler was a strong individual but he wouldn't be able to rise to power in a prosperous country with satisfied citizens. Or 20th-century revolutions and turmoils are a logical conclusion of the Industrial Revolution which led to increasing population, an increase of literacy and attempts to change the inequalities between the peasants and the aristocracy.

Even the women liberation movement couldn't have happened 50 years before it did, and even if it is attributed to certain females, it would have happened anyway as would the civil rights movement in the USA. So whatever we have today is the logical conclusion. I don't think we live in the worst of times. The divide between rich and poor in the West is the lowest in history. Also being poor today is living in an apartment with food, entertainment, and government support. The possibility for social mobility is high as ever.

Some users here praise Islam and hope it will come to the west. But it's absurd. It's a backward ideology just like Christianity. You can't follow rules written centuries ago. The only purpose of religion is to rule over illiterate uneducated stupid people. One couldn't explain to a dumb middle eastern peasant why it's not okay to fuck a goat, so he threatened the peasant he'll burn in hell. One couldn't ensure the survival of your religion, so he created a death penalty for apostasy. One couldn't force people to reproduce without legalizing marrying 4 wives.

Every social or religious rule we have is based on a reason. Why we think so bad of cheating wives but not so bad of cheating husbands? Because a wife can bear someone else's child and it's unacceptable. Why we think so bad of "our" women marrying "their" men (christian women marrying a muslim and becoming a muslim?) Because females are society's currency.

Think about it. Christianity promises eternal pleasure in heaven, islam promises 72 virgins. Religious people are the horniest and least spiritual motherfuckers because everything they do is to achieve body pleasures after death. But people of today don't need religion. I don't kill because I am afraid of hell, but because I am not a psychopath. When someone tries to sell me religion I think that I am too skeptical and too curious to accept it.

So back to the modern world. Female promiscuity was inevitable due to the increased quality of birth control and quality of life. I mean, many of them don't really need a husband to live a comfortable life. I don't think feminism is to blame although it does play it's role. Take feminism out of the equation, and something else will take its place. Women would still fuck without consequences because feminism didn't invent the birth control pill.

It's a weird world we live in. Poor countries are in turmoil, second world countries try to follow the West, the world gradually moves away from religion to secularity, globalism and free market. But there are still clashes of ideologies, that cause the rise of opposition to the liberal values of rich countries. Trump, Brexit were kinda predictable, and a nice response to the rise of leftists degeneracy.

So my prediction for the next 100-200 years is that the world will become more secular and more liberal and actually more fair so that in future there will be no double standards for white and black or males and females. We now see the beginning of this happening when a trans chick was called racist and fired saying something about hating white people, but it's a long way to go. There will be no artificial affirmative actions and no complaints about "white male privilege" because it will be considered sexist and racist. Technology will allow longer and better lives which will cause an increased level of mental issues and suicides and that will be the biggest issue. As for sexual life, I think that people will have less and less sex because with increased comfort people are less social and more demanding I guess. But at the same time, I think incels will have more chances because that new society will try to eliminate double standards, so as much as landwhales get a lot of sex today, ugly males will get sex in future.

I think the group mentality won't go away but it will take a form of protecting your own group. There will be black feminist groups, ugly indian groups, married men groups and they will be equally valuable, not like today when a feminist group shuts down the Men rights movement. Individualism will be also on the rise and it won't contradict the groups.

Thanks if you read this. What are your thoughts?
 
The divide between rich and poor in the West is the lowest in history.

No it's way higher. Maybe 60 years ago it was the lowest.

I skimmed through most of this but this is definitely post peak and only getting worse from here.

* and that's in every facet
 
No it's way higher. Maybe 60 years ago it was the lowest.

I skimmed through most of this but this is definitely post peak and only getting worse from here.

* and that's in every facet
Yeah but the definition of rich and poor changes. Are you looking at different countries or within western society only?
 
Yeah but the definition of rich and poor changes. Are you looking at different countries or within western society only?

Within western society.

Arguably you could say things got a lot better in the third world but western society is deteriorating in every way and will soon be third world.
 
High IQ, but the wealth difference is not at an all time low by a longshot, or probably was roughly 70 years ago.
But the west, especially Europe will most likely collapse sooner or later as a result of extreme leftism an degeneracy.
 
Within western society.

Arguably you could say things got a lot better in the third world but western society is deteriorating in every way and will soon be third world.

I don't think that within western society the rich/poor divide is higher than it used to be. You have to take into account the possibilities of poor becoming rich, and also that the poor people today live much more comfortable lives than poor people in the past. We have a strong middle class which was non-existent in the past.

Also I don't believe in western society becoming the 3rd world. I think you see sjw and other shit and don't consider that they are a very minor insignificant percentage, they are just the loudest voices today.
High IQ, but the wealth difference is not at an all time low by a longshot, or probably was roughly 70 years ago.
But the west, especially Europe will most likely collapse sooner or later as a result of extreme leftism an degeneracy.
I replied to a comment above, I don't think it will happen because the silent majority aren't leftists. The real leftists are a very small percentage.
 
True, blackpill is the law of life as we know it. Natural selection.

The reason history always repeats itself is because chad always wins.
 
- The wealth difference is not at an all time low by a longshot, or probably was roughly 70 years ago.
- But the west, especially Europe will most likely collapse sooner or later as a result of extreme leftism an degeneracy.
Pick one.
 
Why, they are both true statements.
I don't like if people just lump everything together left or right of their own ideology. It dilutes the terminologies, makes future discussions much harder and teaches uneducated bystanders bullshit. This is a "liberal" problem, not a left one.

With a left world order point one would not be existing.

And spare me with things like "Agreed, because everyone would be poor then. hudurhudur." pls. JFL at people criticizing femininism but falling for economic jew propaganda.
 

Similar threads

currymuncher007
Replies
13
Views
238
currymuncher007
currymuncher007
KingOfInceldia
Replies
8
Views
265
KingOfInceldia
KingOfInceldia
Old Ironsides
Replies
4
Views
233
Abacaxi14
Abacaxi14

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top