what i meant to say is that there has always been incels. Modern society has nothing to do with the existence of incels, that's nature, only the sheer amount of them is contributed to feminism and such
Exactly.
Across all mammal species, there will
always be a group of males that will live an entire life without reproducing, due to falling short
genetically.
Why people think humans are any difference is nonsensical.
As you've highlighted in your comment, the shear amount of
Incels are increasing. There has always been men who never breeded and this can be observed due to the sudden genetic drop-offs when looking at family trees.
However, the amount of men that are Incels compared to the past? That's the cause for concern. Not only that, the rate at which men are becoming
Involuntarily celibate makes the rate at which foids are becoming "celibate" negligible.
The matter needs to be addressed.
Female eggs will always be valuable and the analogy which I try and dictate to illogical redditors is: let's say you wiped out every male on earth and EVERY single sperm bank that exists and left
5 healthy men. An asian (eastern), a black, a caucasion, a curry and a mexican.
I can assure you, that each guy
alone could impregnate around 25 women a day.
Let's say they're doing this for 50 years. One of them could impregnate 456,250 women
without medical intervention during that 50 year duration.
This should exemplify how worthless we are as men as foids could probably only give birth to 20-40 children (it will greatly vary), if we reversed the scenario.
Childbirth is a huge risk for foids, so why are they gonna have sex with the 5'5 normie when they could go for the 6'4 chad?
The primary purpose of sex
used to be for reproduction, but now in a growing population: sex should only be reserved for man and wife. In-spite of sex being used for pleasure, a primal part of the women's brain will still want to select the best genetically mate available despite there being no intentions of having a child.
