For me it’s 81.25% if mixed with non-European caucasoid admixture, 87.5% if mixed with mongoloid admixture, and 100% if negroid and australoid admixture are considered.
Discussion Minimum percent of European admixture to be considered white?
@DarkStar @user @To koniec
It's about looks, if he looks and passes as white, he will be treated like white.
I'm supposed to be ''white'' but I don't look white. I look more like gypsy mexican, IT'S OVER FOR ME
I'm supposed to be ''white'' but I don't look white. I look more like gypsy mexican, IT'S OVER FOR ME
100% = over for most south europeans
Why? aren't they just tanned cause of the hot sun?
Among normies maybe. From a racialist and genetic point of view castizos can’t be considered white, regardless of their phenotype.
Some scandinavians can have residual mongoloid admixture, so it’s be over for them too.
Cope, Jordan Barrett has abo DNA that's why his maxilla is so forward yet he's seen as a white Chadstralian
this one is probably bs though lol
Maps of autosomal DNA based on academic papers, admixture calculators from the Dodecad Project and Eurogenes, as well as 23andMe's Ancestry Components.
Distribution maps of autosomal DNA in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa.
www.eupedia.com
U
87.5% or higher is necessary for someone to be considered genetically white in my opinion.
I disagree. Whiteness is about blood and culture. Anyone who isn't genetically white and native to Europe shouldn't be treated as one of our own. You likely have Gypsy blood If you live in Balkan countries and look like one JFL.
Most Europeans have small ammounts of non-White admixture. That logic is retarded.
We're just depigmented Nordics!
Last edited:
would be over for most Slavs also
They have some, but not much in them
Nightmare tier, white enough to not look ethnic to shitskins but not white enough for actual whites
Also, these genes have been present in South Europe for a long time:View attachment 1378330
View attachment 1378331
View attachment 1378332
this one is probably bs though lol
Maps of autosomal DNA based on academic papers, admixture calculators from the Dodecad Project and Eurogenes, as well as 23andMe's Ancestry Components.
Distribution maps of autosomal DNA in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa.www.eupedia.com
Modern Europeans Descended from Three Groups of Ancestors | HHMI
HHMI scientists have shown that previously unrecognized groups contributed to the genetic mix now present in most modern-day Europeans.
It's also quite low the more up-north you get in those countries which is where most of them live usually(at least for Italy).
U
Fuck off, you're just an ethnic leeching off Italian resources. We will never be as ethnic as you.View attachment 1378330
View attachment 1378331
View attachment 1378332
this one is probably bs though lol
Maps of autosomal DNA based on academic papers, admixture calculators from the Dodecad Project and Eurogenes, as well as 23andMe's Ancestry Components.
Distribution maps of autosomal DNA in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa.www.eupedia.com
I can find many infographics showcasing non-White admixture for other European populations.
Also, these genes have been present in South Europe for a long time:
Modern Europeans Descended from Three Groups of Ancestors | HHMI
HHMI scientists have shown that previously unrecognized groups contributed to the genetic mix now present in most modern-day Europeans.www.hhmi.org
It's also quite low the more up-north you get in those countries which is where most of them live usually(at least for Italy).
That's true, I live there in the north and (at least the natives, not counting the southern ones) look very similar to austrians and germans
I am not saying that I am just being pragmatic no need to get offended. It takes only one al-andalus race mixing incident or a saracen raid rape to fuck up plenty of descendants hence why the 1 drop rule is retarded, and I agree that we look very different
I wish ngl half of southern italians here evade taxes while I pay them like a cuck
Depends on the group:
-At least 80-85% if non-European Caucasoid
-90%+ for Mongoloid
-100% for Negroid+Australoid(one-drop rule)
(note, the African on some of the maps posted is iberomarusian I believe, which is more distinctly North African than actual Sub-Saharan)
Some people in the periphery of Med regions like Coastal South Italy, Sicily, Greek Islands, Andalusia, etc. have MENA phenos but are still European genetically:
But as I said, these populations have existed since the Bronze Age
What happened was it was a MENA minority ruling over the lower classes, with most Muslims as converts. Some did mix eventually with the Muslims, but they eventually left with them when the Moors got expelled.
Some people from both groups can pass as the other due to shared phenotypes, but these are a minority found on coastal regions; many North African Berbers also have recent Black admixture not found in Meds.
-At least 80-85% if non-European Caucasoid
-90%+ for Mongoloid
-100% for Negroid+Australoid(one-drop rule)
(note, the African on some of the maps posted is iberomarusian I believe, which is more distinctly North African than actual Sub-Saharan)
Yeah same is true for Spain as well
Some people in the periphery of Med regions like Coastal South Italy, Sicily, Greek Islands, Andalusia, etc. have MENA phenos but are still European genetically:
But as I said, these populations have existed since the Bronze Age
Yeah I agree race has more to do with "skins tone" and has a lot to do also with genotype as well, since that can determine various behavioral traits, cognitive functions, etc. which when in a group forms culture/identity.
No, you have it the wrong way around.
What happened was it was a MENA minority ruling over the lower classes, with most Muslims as converts. Some did mix eventually with the Muslims, but they eventually left with them when the Moors got expelled.
Some people from both groups can pass as the other due to shared phenotypes, but these are a minority found on coastal regions; many North African Berbers also have recent Black admixture not found in Meds.
true I have nigger hair hence why I named my account Negroid Berber
I made a DNA test (yes I know I gave my dna to jews) and I am waiting for the results, wouldn't be surprised if I got 10% subsaharan from senegal/nigeria but I could also be 100% nafri because my father family is native to the central atlas idk about my mother
The only nafri that can pass as andalusians/sicilians are probably a very small % of riffians/kabyles since even if they are light skinned they have a different phenotype
U
I agree.
Trvth.Yeah same is true for Spain as well
Some people in the periphery of Med regions like Coastal South Italy, Sicily, Greek Islands, Andalusia, etc. have MENA phenos but are still European genetically:
But as I said, these populations have existed since the Bronze Age
Yep. Homogeneous groups with shared genetics create stronger, more cohesive societies, while racial mixing can weaken social unity and cultural identity. The genetic makeup of a population directly influences its societal strength and stability
@MountainGorilla Thoughts?
U
I consider quapas (25% white 75% Asian) white
I am 100% white so I consider anything less unacceptable
No one is 100%
P
voted 81% but some can look white with less than that, others not at all.
it depends on looks but anyone who genuinely believes in one drop rule is just retarded
it depends on looks but anyone who genuinely believes in one drop rule is just retarded
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
