Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over Millennials and Gen Z won’t have enough kids to sustain America’s population—and it’s up to immigrants to make up the baby shortfall

Words cannot describe how much I hate this generation.
 
Words cannot describe how much I hate this generation.
How about we don't import immigrants, and automate jobs?
We keep our culture, and we're also safe from uncivilised primitive savages.
 
Last edited:
Second demographic transition is irreversible. Also immigrants are cheaper
 
idc, i'll be dead, i'll be dust, everything that comes after me can rot or vanish :feelshaha:
 
How about we don't import immigrants and automate jobs?
We keep our culture, and we're also safe from uncivilised primitive savages.
They tried that in Japan but old fucks outnumber workers like 2:1 now, there is no one to pay for social security & healthcare, and the economy has been dead for 30 years

can't win either way
 
They tried that in Japan but old fucks outnumber workers like 2:1 now, there is no one to pay for social security & healthcare, and the economy has been dead for 30 years

can't win either way
Japan still has the 3rd largest economy and they could use UBI. It's also a much safer country than the big cities of Western Europe/US.
 
How about we don't import immigrants and automate jobs?
We keep our culture, and we're also safe from uncivilised primitive savages.
A third world population cannot build a first world country. We would be worse off if immigrants were to become the majority, and that unfortunately is the direction in which our countries seem to be heading. I like the idea of automation. We would not have to hear the old, lame argument that "immigrants do all the hard work." Robots will do the trick. Foreigners can clean the sewage of their own countries.
 
Poor people love to fuck. They also use protection less. It's known and proven that rich people typically have less kids or no kids at all.
 
Poor people love to fuck. They also use protection less. It's known and proven that rich people typically have less kids or no kids at all.
poor doesn't necessarily mean less intelligent
 
A third world population cannot build a first world country.
Correct. The reason why third world shitholes are third world shitholes, is because their cultures are anti-intellectual and against any technological progress.
We would be worse off if immigrants were to become the majority, and that unfortunately is the direction in which our countries seem to be heading.
We're worse off even when immigrants (including people of immigrant descent) surpass about 20% of the country's total population.
Western Europeans like to talk trash about Eastern Europe, but the reality of the situation is that Kiev (before the war) was much safer than Paris, London, Berlin or Brussels.
This is also true for ANY other Eastern European major city. And it's pretty simple to explain why. They are homogenous and their cultures aren't shit.
I like the idea of automation.
Me too. Provided that there will be some sort of UBI, it will only make the world a better place.
We would not have to hear the old, lame argument that "immigrants do all the hard work."
Which isn't even true, as immigrants don't do the hard work, Unemployment rates among immigrants and people of immigrant origin are higher than natives.
Robots will do the trick. Foreigners can clean the sewage of their own countries.
Exactly. :yes:
 
poor doesn't necessarily mean less intelligent
pfkx04bhulh91.jpg
 
Gen Zog is mostly faggots so no suprise they won't have much kids
 
Poor people love to fuck. They also use protection less. It's known and proven that rich people typically have less kids or no kids at all.
And the worst thing about this is that reproduction among humans is negatively correlated with general intelligence. In other words, smart people breed less than stupid people. It really puts things into perspective.
 
Clown world
We're worse off even when immigrants (including people of immigrant descent) surpass about 20% of the country's total population.
Western Europeans like to talk trash about Eastern Europe, but the reality of the situation is that Kiev (before the war) was much safer than Paris, London, Berlin or Brussels.
This is also true for ANY other Eastern European major city. And it's pretty simple to explain why. They are homogenous and their cultures aren't shit.
 
North Korea is one of the poorest countries on the world. However, you can see; either they manipulate it, either socialism makes it, either their data is fake.

The USA as a superpower literally has been pushed forward by immigrants, nazi and foreign scientists. Literally the most powerful nation in the world has been rised by immigrants.
 
The USA as a superpower literally has been pushed forward by immigrants, nazi and foreign scientists. Literally the most powerful nation in the world has been rised by immigrants.
You know exactly what we mean by immigrants. Mixed-breeds from Latin America or Muslim terrorists from the Middle East did not build this country; it was built by European, also known as White, immigrants. National Socialists were German. Almost everything you can see and touch was invented by Whites. We don't need brown people in the slightest. All White is all right.
 
Japan still has the 3rd largest economy and they could use UBI. It's also a much safer country than the big cities of Western Europe/US.
Japan has the highest debt to GDP on the planet, they can't afford to retire, let alone free money for existing.

Feminism kills societies, just like all applications of communism.

Also lol at UBI, they'll just shoot you. This motherfucker thinks they'll just pay people to exist when they don't produce food at the end of a gun.

They have UBI now, it's called welfare, and it goes bankrupt in about 10 years because it is a pyramid scheme, and you are all out of suckers.
 
Last edited:
They are going to destroy the world. Incel's wet fantasies, or the biggest cope.
Yeah, it is a pretty big cope.
Blaming the newest generation for the century of failure of the previous ones is stupid.
 
You know exactly what we mean by immigrants [...] All White is all right.
Taking into account that the Hispanic or Latino population in the United States represents 18% (under a population of 330 million and 60 million Latinos reported), it would be rash to say that their social contribution is irrelevant; representing a large part of the GDP and the tax burden. The same would be true of other races, whether mixed or kept in ethnic ghettos. And worst of all, is that of all the great discoveries of these scientists, they want to give a white bombast of social progress. The most important physicist of the 20th century was a ethnically Jew; the top 10 of chess players are directly immigrants or are second or third generation descendants; many USA Nobel Prizes were won by immigrants, especially Asians and there are many latino-descendants that also won this prize representing the USA.

White superiority is proving inefficient. Their intelligence is so great that they are destroying themselves with a birth rate that is supported by immigrants. If the rate of development causes families to have fewer children, we have two explanations: either Marx was right and with material progress religion and values end up being buried; or intelligence is the same that will destroy developed nations by its own hedonistic impulse and lack of planning.
 
Japan has the highest debt to GDP on the planet, they can't afford to retire, let alone free money for existing.
Most dept that all countries have isn't real. They essentially owe it to the universe.
Feminism kills societies, just like all applications of communism.
Yes.
Also lol at UBI, they'll just shoot you. This motherfucker thinks they'll just pay people to exist when they don't produce food at the end of a gun.
Evidence to suggest that claim?
They have UBI now, it's called welfare, and it goes bankrupt in about 10 years because it is a pyramid scheme, and you are all out of suckers.
Most intelligent GrAY of 2021.
 
North Korea is one of the poorest countries on the world. However, you can see; either they manipulate it, either socialism makes it, either their data is fake.
THey manipulate it.
The USA as a superpower literally has been pushed forward by immigrants, nazi and foreign scientists. Literally the most powerful nation in the world has been rised by immigrants.
The USA is declining, and the "immigrants" who rose it are Europeans. Obviously it would rise to power with European immigrants.
 
Taking into account that the Hispanic or Latino population in the United States represents 18% (under a population of 330 million and 60 million Latinos reported), it would be rash to say that their social contribution is irrelevant; representing a large part of the GDP and the tax burden. The same would be true of other races, whether mixed or kept in ethnic ghettos. And worst of all, is that of all the great discoveries of these scientists, they want to give a white bombast of social progress. The most important physicist of the 20th century was a ethnically Jew; the top 10 of chess players are directly immigrants or are second or third generation descendants; many USA Nobel Prizes were won by immigrants, especially Asians and there are many latino-descendants that also won this prize representing the USA.
Unemployment is higher among immigrants and descendants of immigrants. First of all, it doesn't matter that the most important physicist of the 20th century was a jew, whites are overrepresented among nobel prize winners. Blacks and brown people are underrepresented.
Muslims are heavily underrepresented in particular.
 
Taking into account that the Hispanic or Latino population in the United States represents 18% (under a population of 330 million and 60 million Latinos reported), it would be rash to say that their social contribution is irrelevant; representing a large part of the GDP and the tax burden.
Irrelevant economic argument. I am not arguing from an economic perspective.

I have the racial and ethnic cohesion of the country in mind. The fact that you brought up economics right away demonstrates where your priorities are.

Immigrants harm American workers in a simple way: more competition in the workforce reduces job opportunities and decreases wages. You are less likely to find a job now, and if you manage to find one, it will pay you less than it would in case the immigrants were kicked out.

Read and learn:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...immigration-economy-unemployment-jobs-214216/

Incidentally, despite being a minority in the United States, Hispanics commit a disproportionate amount of crimes. They only lose to Blacks when it comes to criminality.

So much for your "social contribution".

The most important physicist of the 20th century was a ethnically Jew.
Einstein was almost certainly the greatest fraud and plagiarist in modern science and an unashamed intellectual thief. His fame and popularity today, his status as a hero of the scientific world, are due only to decades of a well-planned force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses by the MSM.


One of the greatest mythical frauds in history is that of Albert Einstein, the famous physicist who invented the Theory of Relativity, E=mc² and so many other esoteric things. But this is all fabrication. The claims about Einstein inventing any theory of relativity, or light and photons, or time, are false. Almost every claim – almost everything – attributed to Einstein is simply a lie. Einstein was an inept who contributed nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. Far from being a competent physicist, he once even flatly denied that the atom could be split and, much later, admitted that the idea of a chain reaction in fissile material “had never occurred to me”.

Einstein was a third-class clerk at the government patent office in Bern, and never progressed beyond this level even with years of experience. By all contemporary reports, Einstein wasn’t even an accomplished mathematician. It has been well documented that much of the mathematical content of Einstein’s so-called theories were well beyond his ability. Walter Isaacson, president of the Aspen Institute, stated that Einstein’s first wife Mileva Marić was a “Serbian physicist who had helped him with (his) math . . .” Other prominent scientists have made the claim that his wife did most of his math for him.

Henri Poincaré was the foremost expert on relativity in the late 19th century and the first person to formally present the theories, having published more than 30 books and over 500 papers on the topics. Extensive documentation exists that Einstein and his associates had studied Poincaré’s theories and mathematics for years, yet when Einstein published his almost wholly-plagiarised versions he made no reference whatever to these other works.

In the accepted historical account, Einstein is credited with having written the correct field equations for general relativity, an enormous falsehood. It is an undisputed fact that David Hilbert sent Einstein a draft of his work (which had already been submitted for publication), containing precisely these equations, evidenced by the existence of a letter from Einstein to Hilbert thanking him for doing so. Yet a few weeks later, Einstein delivered a public speech of Hilbert’s work, claiming full credit for the derivation of Hilbert’s equations. Similarly, E=mc², the famous equation relating mass, energy, and the speed of light, had been published several times by Italian physicist Olinto De Pretto, long before Einstein was suddenly given credit for it. In multiple thorough reviews of scientific literature, prominent scientists have unanimously stated that there is “absolutely nothing to connect Einstein to the derivation of this formula.”

Einstein’s papers, theories, mathematics, documentation, were almost 100% plagiarised from others. He combined the prior published works of several people into one paper and claimed ownership of all of it. His so-called theories were nothing more than a composition encompassing the prior work of men like James Maxwell, Hendrik Lorentz, Joseph Larmor, Olinto De Pretto, Robert Brown, Ludwig Boltzmann, Friedrich Hasenöhrl, and many more.

In a paper he wrote in 1907, in part responding to (already-virulent) accusations of plagiarism, Einstein declared that plagiarism was perfectly acceptable as a form of ethical research, stating “… the nature [of physics is] that what follows has already been partly solved by other authors. I am [therefore] entitled to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature…”[6][7][8] In other words, scientists all build on each others’ work, so Einstein could freely compile the work of everyone before him and re-present it as his own, with no obligation to even mention them or their work. His view of ethical science was like building a tower where each person adds one stone and, if I add the last stone, I not only take credit for the entire design and construction of the tower, but I own the building.

Perhaps the most damning evidence was when in 1953 Sir Edmund Whittaker published a very detailed account of the origin and development of all these theories and equations of physics, with extensive reference to the primary sources, documenting beyond doubt that Einstein had no priority in any of it, and clearly stating so. Einstein was alive and well when Whittaker published his book, yet he offered no dispute to the conclusions, no refutation of Whittaker’s claim that he (Einstein) had been irrelevant to the entire process. Einstein made no attempts in his own defense but simply hid in the bushes and refused to make any public comment whatever.[9]

Einstein was almost certainly the greatest fraud and plagiarist in modern science, an unashamed intellectual thief but, according to sources like Wikipedia, this is all just a minor “priority dispute” about who said what first in the realm of relativity physics. These sources misleadingly imply that several people made a discovery independently and more or less simultaneously, and we are simply debating who went public first. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Wikipedia is renowned as being virtually useless as an information source due to widespread ideological bias and censorship.

Einstein was Jewish and had the support of the Jewish-controlled media who conspired to create yet another historical myth. His fame and popularity today, his status as a hero of the scientific world, are due only to decades of a well-planned force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses by the media. The propaganda machine simply airbrushed out of the history books all the physicists who formulated these theories, and credited everything to Einstein. Without the extravagant generations-long PR and propaganda campaign, Einstein would have remained in the dustbin of obscurity where he belongs.

There are many Einstein apologists who produce reams of heavily-documented irrelevancies masquerading as proof, items such as a schoolmate who claimed “the flight of his mathematical genius was so high that I could no longer follow.” Many scientists and scientific historians know the truth of all this, and the accurate historical record is readily available, but many appear afraid to speak out for fear of damaging their careers.


the top 10 of chess players are directly immigrants or are second or third generation descendants;
Chess players? For real? Do you honestly believe we would be worse off without a few chess players? Your priorities are misplaced.

By the way, Magnus Carlsen is the greatest player in the world and he is White, and so was his mentor Kasparov.


many USA Nobel Prizes were won by immigrants, especially Asians and there are many latino-descendants that also won this prize representing the USA.
The validity of Nobel Prizes is debatable, as the committee behind it seeks to reward individuals that go along with its political agenda. It is no more trustful than the Oscar committee which elects the best professional actor based on its multiculturalist, globohomo agenda.


Their intelligence is so great that they are destroying themselves with a birth rate that is supported by immigrants.
Most Whites who refuse to reproduce are tolerant towards multiculturalism, while most Whites who have lots of children are intolerant towards multiculturalism. In a few generations, there will be more intolerant Whites like me because the liberals will have bred themselves out of existence or not bred at all.
 
Last edited:
Unemployment is higher among immigrants and descendants of immigrants
Of course; and they are precisely the ones who do the dirty work in conditions of subhumanity because they are cheaper than the native. Many immigrants do not even have papers and in those conditions of exploitation and the need of the immigrant, they live in precarious conditions for the benefit of the employer.
whites are overrepresented among nobel prize winners
Yes, of course, and it is natural, especially when many were imported from their countries of origin. The United States does not possess a native education and intellectual circle; It is the feedback they have received from so many immigrants.
Blacks and brown people are underrepresented
In the case of blacks, we can already imagine under what conditions they leave. If we understand inceldom, lookism as a relevant aspect for social and economic development, as many brocels argue, being black after a long history of slavery, forced ghettos, spaces for whites and blacks, added difficulties, you could realize Realize that these material conditions are dragged for a long time. The fact that 70% of the population is white in contrast to a bare 10% of blacks, logically makes the contribution of whites greater than that of other races, because they are an overwhelming majority.

However, all races and ethnicities have had a hero among their ranks, intellectually as well as materially, many of them imported from their countries of origin, others subsidized by the State. We talk about intelligentsia, but we can extrapolate American competitive successes in many fields and we would find that it is not all white superiority, like sports, where black genetics also remain persistent and that has given the nation enormous successes in those terms.

Muslims are heavily underrepresented in particular.
Of course, they represent 1% of USA's population, and most of them are walking towards atheism or secular islam, which is basically cultural values with no attachment to religious values. It happens to be the same thing.
 
Of course; and they are precisely the ones who do the dirty work in conditions of subhumanity because they are cheaper than the native. Many immigrants do not even have papers and in those conditions of exploitation and the need of the immigrant, they live in precarious conditions for the benefit of the employer.
They are also called dead-end jobs because they are the easiest to be lost to automation, and it's already happening.
Yes, of course, and it is natural, especially when many were imported from their countries of origin. The United States does not possess a native education and intellectual circle; It is the feedback they have received from so many immigrants.
If the immigrants are white, then the country will prosper, I agree.
Europeans (in Europe) are also overrepresented in Nobel Prizes.
In the case of blacks, we can already imagine under what conditions they leave. If we understand inceldom, lookism as a relevant aspect for social and economic development, as many brocels argue, being black after a long history of slavery, forced ghettos, spaces for whites and blacks, added difficulties, you could realize Realize that these material conditions are dragged for a long time. The fact that 70% of the population is white in contrast to a bare 10% of blacks, logically makes the contribution of whites greater than that of other races, because they are an overwhelming majority.
Here's a question. If black people were just as good as whites, wouldn't that make it impossible for Europeans to colonise Africa in the first place? Why didn't black people colonise Europe? Because their culture is not as good and doesn't push for progress as much.
However, all races and ethnicities have had a hero among their ranks, intellectually as well as materially, many of them imported from their countries of origin, others subsidized by the State. We talk about intelligentsia, but we can extrapolate American competitive successes in many fields and we would find that it is not all white superiority, like sports, where black genetics also remain persistent and that has given the nation enormous successes in those terms.
The sports arguement is false. The reason black people are overrepresented in sports is because black people are more likely to push for a career in sports. The reason for that is because it's the only realistic way out of poverty for the vast majority of black people.
Of course, they represent 1% of USA's population, and most of them are walking towards atheism or secular islam, which is basically cultural values with no attachment to religious values. It happens to be the same thing.
Muslims in the US tend to be more secular, but that's not exactly the case with Europe. In Europe, most jihadists are actually 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants who hate its society.
 
I have the racial and ethnic cohesion of the country in mind. The fact that you brought up economics right away demonstrates where your priorities are.
The economy is probably the fundamental key to the development of nations. If you want to allude to metaphysical issues, it is as absurd as it is irrelevant. The spirituality of nations has already died from long ago by globalism where the primacy of issues and priorities lies in money and hedonism (or your ability to satisfy such).
Immigrants harm American workers in a simple way: more competition in the workforce reduces job opportunities and decreases wages. You are less likely to find a job now, and if you manage to find one, it will pay you less than it would in case the immigrants were kicked out.
This is how the market works; through underground economies, the entrepreneur earns more benefits. This happens in all developed countries where it is preferred to use immigrants for the most laborious or subhuman jobs. If there is no demand, there is no business.
Incidentally, despite being a minority in the United States, Hispanics commit a disproportionate amount of crimes. They only lose to Blacks when it comes to criminality.
Go look at the crime rate in a large part of the planet and especially in developed countries. The crime rate is directly proportional to the material conditions, where the immigrant and minority groups are generally the most vulnerable.
One of the greatest mythical frauds in history is that of Albert Einstein, the famous physicist who invented the Theory of Relativity, E=mc²
No one who read about Physics divulgation and its history would say that Albert Einstein "invented" it. What is attributed to Einstein is that, after the imprecise work of previous scientists, he arrived at the correct and precise formula.

And by the way, the physical and scientific foundations are not invented, they are discovered. This makes me think that your scientific knowledge is either poor or you lack clear linguistic deficiencies in understanding what the meaning of words is. Of course, English is not my native language and I also make grammatical mistakes, but I find it curious how with the confidence you show when talking about the scientific field, you refer to "invention" instead of "discovery".
Einstein was almost certainly the greatest fraud and plagiarist in modern science and an unashamed intellectual thief. His fame and popularity today, his status as a hero of the scientific world, are due only to decades of a well-planned force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses by the MSM.
This statement is not accurate. Einstein was a highly respected and renowned physicist, known for his groundbreaking work in the field of theoretical physics, including the development of the theory of relativity and the famous equation, E=mc², as a novelty and precisely, not as other approaches that were not fully correct. His contributions to science have been widely recognized and have had a major impact on our understanding of the universe. The assertion that he was a "fraud and plagiarist" is not supported by evidence. Use YouTube's English translation for this:



The claims about Einstein inventing any theory of relativity, or light and photons, or time, are false. Almost every claim – almost everything – attributed to Einstein is simply a lie. Einstein was an inept who contributed nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. Far from being a competent physicist, he once even flatly denied that the atom could be split and, much later, admitted that the idea of a chain reaction in fissile material “had never occurred to me”.
Albert Einstein's contributions to the field of physics are widely recognized and considered groundbreaking. He developed the theory of special relativity, which fundamentally changed our understanding of space and time, and the theory of general relativity, which revolutionized our understanding of gravity. He also made important contributions to the development of quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics. His work on the photoelectric effect, which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for, was a major step forward in the development of the quantum theory. It is true that Einstein did not believe in certain aspects of quantum mechanics and had some disagreements with other scientists on the subject, but this is common in science where theories and ideas are constantly being scrutinized, debated and updated. It is not accurate to say that he contributed nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics and other science, his contributions are widely recognized by the scientific community.

Science is a field that receives feedback from past generations, like any field of serious knowledge. If it weren't for the contributions of Darwin, eugenicists, and evolutionary biology, we would today consider blackpill a pseudoscience. As you repeat the term invent again you fall into ostracism again. Science advances through itself, not outside of it.
Einstein was almost certainly the greatest fraud and plagiarist in modern science, an unashamed intellectual thief but, according to sources like Wikipedia, this is all just a minor “priority dispute” about who said what first in the realm of relativity physics. These sources misleadingly imply that several people made a discovery independently and more or less simultaneously, and we are simply debating who went public first. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Wikipedia is renowned as being virtually useless as an information source due to widespread ideological bias and censorship
It is not accurate to say that Einstein was a fraud and plagiarist in modern science. While there have been some historical disputes over priority in the development of certain theories, such as the theory of relativity, as we haveen debating, this is not unusual in the field of science and does not diminish the significance of Einstein's contributions. The statement about Wikipedia being virtually useless as an information source due to widespread ideological bias and censorship is also not accurate. Wikipedia is a widely used and well-regarded online encyclopedia that is written and edited by volunteers from around the world. It is true that there can be inaccuracies or bias on Wikipedia, as with any source of information, but the community of editors works to fact-check and improve the accuracy of the content. Additionally, Wikipedia's articles are often supported by reliable sources and cites, enabling readers to check the information for themselves. We can spend hours debating many Wikipedia articles, but today, it is a general knowledge reference.
Without the extravagant generations-long PR and propaganda campaign, Einstein would have remained in the dustbin of obscurity where he belongs.
I highly doubt it, because of all the approximations that have been made regarding the behavior of the photoelectric field, it was genuinely Einstein who gave the precise answers. And this occurs in each generation of scientists who collect the remains of the work of others to reach the most feasible conclusions. Not understanding this is lacking scientific culture and how science has been developed over the centuries, because education is precisely based on riding on the shoulders of giants. That's right, that many Nobel prizes were shared because several scientists reached similar conclusions or because they collaborated to reach these conclusions.
There are many Einstein apologists who produce reams of heavily-documented irrelevancies masquerading as proof, items such as a schoolmate who claimed “the flight of his mathematical genius was so high that I could no longer follow.” Many scientists and scientific historians know the truth of all this, and the accurate historical record is readily available, but many appear afraid to speak out for fear of damaging their careers.

If you do not like Einstein, you will find many others of different ethnicities and imported for those purposes, from jews, to curries, passing by sandniggers.
Chess players? For real? Do you honestly believe we would be worse off without a few chess players? Your priorities are misplaced.

Yes, it is a characteristic example, because before and after Bobby Fischer (of Polish Jewish descent, by the way) American chess was terribly filthy and weak. This example helped me to illustrate how many of the successes achieved by the United States are based on the importation of immigrants.
By the way, Magnus Carlsen is the greatest player in the world and he is White, and so was his mentor Kasparov.

You will find that the definition of white in these types of issues is somewhat confusing considering that the debate of who is white is hot and has many characterizations. Some say they are of European descent, others that they have not mixed in dozens of generations with other races, and others appeal to inescapable metaphysical sentiments. In racial or ethnic terms, the best chess players were Slavs and Caucasians (geographically). And many of them had Jewish ascendancy, like Kasparov or Botvinnik.

In fact, we had a curry as World Chess Championship, such as Anand. Without USA's importation of immigrants, the USA would be a trash as a chess team.

The validity of Nobel Prizes is debatable, as the committee behind it seeks to reward individuals that go along with its political agenda. It is no more trustful than the Oscar committee which elects the best professional actor based on its multiculturalist, globohomo agenda.

Fair enough, but scientific ones are still relevant and insightful.
Most Whites who refuse to reproduce are tolerant towards multiculturalism, while most Whites who have lots of children are intolerant towards multiculturalism. In a few generations, there will be more intolerant Whites like me because the liberals will have bred themselves out of existence or not bred at all.
It has no objective basis that the idea precedes the material conditions. Whites do not reproduce because of the social superstructure, which in turn is fed by the material conditions of competitiveness, inclusion in the women's market, and given the overflow of material supply, people do not want to have children, including the destruction of moral values, religiousness and past social roles.
 
Most dept that all countries have isn't real. They essentially owe it to the universe.
Sure, but without a supply of future tax slaves, there are consequences, which country are we talking about again?


Economics tells us that exchange rate management, monetary autonomy and free capital mobility are incompatible — ‘the impossible trinity’. Policymakers must give up one of these goals. Japan cannot maintain a stable yen, keep interest rates low and keep up free capital flows simultaneously. A rise in interest rates will soon become inevitable unless people tolerate price hikes or prefer capital control.

The Japanese government’s balance sheet shows a negative net worth of 592 trillion yen (US$4.3 trillion), with their authority to collect taxes existing conceptually as an invisible asset.

No tax slaves, no future free money :)

Evidence to suggest that claim?

Heck, communism requires you to work, or they shoot you:


Have fun.
 
They are also called dead-end jobs because they are the easiest to be lost to automation, and it's already happening.
For this very reason, immigrants are currently the best human resource to exploit, because they are cheap, and if they are cheap, of course they affect the native population; works in addition that the native generally does not want to do. So, it is a vicious circle that is justified through supply and demand, just like the drug market. If there is no demand, there is no supply.
If the immigrants are white, then the country will prosper, I agree.
Europeans (in Europe) are also overrepresented in Nobel Prizes.
The most sensible thing is to import the most outstanding human resources, white, yellow or black.
Here's a question. If black people were just as good as whites, wouldn't that make it impossible for Europeans to colonise Africa in the first place? Why didn't black people colonise Europe? Because their culture is not as good and doesn't push for progress as much.
Sandniggers colonized a big part of the ancient world. The biggest empire of the world was the Mongol Empire. History is full of great empires of different races. The whites won in their dominance in recent history.
The sports arguement is false. The reason black people are overrepresented in sports is because black people are more likely to push for a career in sports. The reason for that is because it's the only realistic way out of poverty for the vast majority of black people.

We can debate this at length and see how in physically demanding sports, black records in many sports are natural to their genetic disposition.
Muslims in the US tend to be more secular, but that's not exactly the case with Europe. In Europe, most jihadists are actually 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants who hate its society.
There are ethnic differences as well. The majority of jihadists are of Maghrebi descent in Europe. Conditions of discrimination and uprooting cause this type of situation in most cases. There are even cases of converts to Islam and jihadists who are eminently white.
 
Sure, but without a supply of future tax slaves, there are consequences, which country are we talking about again?


Economics tells us that exchange rate management, monetary autonomy and free capital mobility are incompatible — ‘the impossible trinity’. Policymakers must give up one of these goals. Japan cannot maintain a stable yen, keep interest rates low and keep up free capital flows simultaneously. A rise in interest rates will soon become inevitable unless people tolerate price hikes or prefer capital control.

The Japanese government’s balance sheet shows a negative net worth of 592 trillion yen (US$4.3 trillion), with their authority to collect taxes existing conceptually as an invisible asset.

No tax slaves, no future free money :)
Given the fact that their population will decline, they won't need to support as many people. I am proposing a radical change in how societies work.
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/forced-labor-ussr https://www.encyclopedia.com/economics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/breadlines Heck, communism requires you to work, or they shoot you:

Have fun.
1. I'm not a communist.
2. https://www.analyticsinsight.net/3-ways-robots-can-help-an-economy-in-an-inflationary-period/
 
For this very reason, immigrants are currently the best human resource to exploit, because they are cheap, and if they are cheap, of course they affect the native population; works in addition that the native generally does not want to do. So, it is a vicious circle that is justified through supply and demand, just like the drug market. If there is no demand, there is no supply.
Which still means that there is no reason for the immigrant not to go back to his country of origin after demand for low-end jobs gets lower.
That's what Germans thought would happen with the Turks in the 60s and they ended up staying despite the German people not wanting them.
The most sensible thing is to import the most outstanding human resources, white, yellow or black.
Whites and Asians are quite overrepresented.
Sandniggers colonized a big part of the ancient world.
The largest Empire was the British Empire, which has influenced all the nations it colonised culturally.
The biggest empire of the world was the Mongol Empire.
Again, that's not true. The biggest empire in history was the British Empire.
History is full of great empires of different races
Which Europeans are overrepresented.
The whites won in their dominance in recent history.
Not true. The Roman Empire was the most powerful empire in the ancient era, and if you want to go back further, you have the Macedonian Empire.
We can debate this at length and see how in physically demanding sports, black records in many sports are natural to their genetic disposition.
Non-black people are underrepresented in sports because they don't have as much of an interest in pursuing careers in sports.
There are ethnic differences as well. The majority of jihadists are of Maghrebi descent in Europe.
Many gangs (so not jihadist) are also made up of Bangladeshis and Pakistanis.
Conditions of discrimination and uprooting cause this type of situation in most cases.
Europeans don't discriminate against MENA people. They're discriminating back. Historically, the MENA people have had a history of trying to conquer Europe.
 
Last edited:
The USA as a superpower literally has been pushed forward by immigrants, nazi and foreign scientists. Literally the most powerful nation in the world has been rised by immigrants.
Yea, by European immigrants. It wasn't till the 1965 immigration act that changed that and no, a few Chinese immigrants building a railway didn't build America. The Irish, German, and English immigrants did.
 
Just wait until Liberal Generation Zog graduates (((university))) only to find out their comfy almost useless white-collar dream job was taken over by A.I. and they scramble to Blue Collar jobs and realize that all those Illegals that they defended took over the Blue Collar job market for the worse and all those years of Conservative White blue collar workers complaining about this issue being dismissed as racist will finally blow up in their face when given the reality of the situation forcing them to either deport them once and for all or have a lower wage slave job for everyone equally.
 
Unemployment is higher among immigrants and descendants of immigrants. First of all, it doesn't matter that the most important physicist of the 20th century was a jew, whites are overrepresented among nobel prize winners. Blacks and brown people are underrepresented.
Muslims are heavily underrepresented in particular.
nobel prize means nothing though. I mean who chooses the winners? Exactly whites decide, mang fcuk trhose white devils and fcuk their prize, bitch ass white niggas
 
nobel prize means nothing though. I mean who chooses the winners? Exactly whites decide, mang fcuk trhose white devils and fcuk their prize, bitch ass white niggas
This is exactly what an ethnic would say.
 
This is exactly what an ethnic would say.
by the way fcuk that piece of shit prize given and decided by old Norwegian blue eyed devils. Fcuk them. They should call it the blue eyed devil prize
 
by the way fcuk that piece of shit prize given and decided by old Norwegian blue eyed devils. Fcuk them. They should call it the blue eyed devil prize
I didn't know it was made by Norwegians. Scandinavians rule.
 
I didn't know it was made by Norwegians. Scandinavians rule.
fuch Scandinavia. They are an absolute minority. They must have mass immigration because just a few years is enough to genocide their genes
 
fuch Scandinavia. They are an absolute minority. They must have mass immigration because just a few years is enough to genocide their genes
BLM statistics don't work on rational people.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top