Was watching foids cancer
vlog when my Orgasm was spoiled by this comment:
View attachment 951960
From experience, this is the polar opposite of reality.
Further down, foids were pointing to studies claiming men are more likely to divorce when their wife gets cancer.
I looked it up and there is a study on it:
Because I am aware of anti-male bias in academia (
thread), I immediately tried to find someone examining the study critically.
The google front page was full of articles and reddit threads repeating this horse shit.
Especially this reddit thread reads like something outta bizarro world:
If this is how women see reality, then I don't know anymore. Some of this shit is clearly larp.
Quotes from that thread:
Straight outta RomCom or something. No human talks like this,complete larp.
These cunts are raised on Soaps and this is how they see reality.
We know that this can't be true because a man, especially a middle aged betabuxxer, simply can't get a 25 year younger wife. Men don't have this option. Again, these are soap opera plots.
Another Thing I will throw into the mix before linking the big Whammy:
"Dying for Sex."
This is a podcast I discovered a while back. This 40 year old roastie got diagnosed with deadly cancer.
She divorced, went on a fuck spree and documented it in a series of podcasts.
I have listened to some of them, they are for free.
Highlights:
1. Bitch went on tinder after "elaborately engineering her profile with a friend." She didn't like the people she met (couple, bitch went for threesome right away).
Then she went on tinder again, 10 minutes later, matched, and fucked a dude on the toilet. No comment.
2. Another time she ended up fucking this dude who worked in a garage that services cars for celebrities. She said she got fucked in the backseat of one of the cars.
Reminder, she was a 40 year old dried up roastie with cancer.
Her on the right, left is the foid she made podcast with:
Here is the podcast. You can find it for full online:
podcasts.google.com
Just scroll down, its six episodes, its all the ones with "Molly" (her).
There is also a book:
Amazon product ASIN B08FXVPQRCView: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08FXVPQRC/ref=as_sl_pc_qf_sp_asin_til?tag=dfsbook-20&linkCode=w00&linkId=9c0b7a6cc1fe2174c8c4d13fdf5a1df1&creativeASIN=B08FXVPQRC
Now, back to the Title of this Thread.
Drumroll
The study was bullshit.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?! NO WAY JOSE!
It was redacted later, they made a "coding error"
A coding error created a false conclusion in a study that found men may be more likely to bail on a marriage if the wife becomes sick, compared to if she's well. Researchers retracted the study.
www.deseret.com
So:
1. The researchers themselves did not detect the error, someone else did.
2. Intentional skewing of data, probably
@WorthlessSlavicShit
That's it for now, have a good day everyone.
