GeckoBus
commanded to be joyful
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
- Posts
- 5,754
Was watching foids cancer vlog when my Orgasm was spoiled by this comment:
From experience, this is the polar opposite of reality.
Further down, foids were pointing to studies claiming men are more likely to divorce when their wife gets cancer.
I looked it up and there is a study on it:
Because I am aware of anti-male bias in academia (thread), I immediately tried to find someone examining the study critically.
The google front page was full of articles and reddit threads repeating this horse shit.
Especially this reddit thread reads like something outta bizarro world:
If this is how women see reality, then I don't know anymore. Some of this shit is clearly larp.
Quotes from that thread:
These cunts are raised on Soaps and this is how they see reality.
Another Thing I will throw into the mix before linking the big Whammy:
"Dying for Sex."
This is a podcast I discovered a while back. This 40 year old roastie got diagnosed with deadly cancer.
She divorced, went on a fuck spree and documented it in a series of podcasts.
I have listened to some of them, they are for free.
Highlights:
1. Bitch went on tinder after "elaborately engineering her profile with a friend." She didn't like the people she met (couple, bitch went for threesome right away).
Then she went on tinder again, 10 minutes later, matched, and fucked a dude on the toilet. No comment.
2. Another time she ended up fucking this dude who worked in a garage that services cars for celebrities. She said she got fucked in the backseat of one of the cars.
Reminder, she was a 40 year old dried up roastie with cancer.
Her on the right, left is the foid she made podcast with:
Here is the podcast. You can find it for full online:
Just scroll down, its six episodes, its all the ones with "Molly" (her).
There is also a book:
Amazon product ASIN B08FXVPQRCView: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08FXVPQRC/ref=as_sl_pc_qf_sp_asin_til?tag=dfsbook-20&linkCode=w00&linkId=9c0b7a6cc1fe2174c8c4d13fdf5a1df1&creativeASIN=B08FXVPQRC
Now, back to the Title of this Thread.
Drumroll
The study was bullshit.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?! NO WAY JOSE!
It was redacted later, they made a "coding error"
So:
1. The researchers themselves did not detect the error, someone else did.
2. Intentional skewing of data, probably @WorthlessSlavicShit
That's it for now, have a good day everyone.
From experience, this is the polar opposite of reality.
Further down, foids were pointing to studies claiming men are more likely to divorce when their wife gets cancer.
I looked it up and there is a study on it:
Because I am aware of anti-male bias in academia (thread), I immediately tried to find someone examining the study critically.
The google front page was full of articles and reddit threads repeating this horse shit.
Especially this reddit thread reads like something outta bizarro world:
If this is how women see reality, then I don't know anymore. Some of this shit is clearly larp.
Quotes from that thread:
Straight outta RomCom or something. No human talks like this,complete larp.My long term boyfriend that I lived with came in to me crying, asked what was wrong, I told him the diagnosis and he took a minute to respond before saying "I need to think about if I want to stay in this relationship. It's really selfish to ask me to keep loving you if you'll never get better"
These cunts are raised on Soaps and this is how they see reality.
We know that this can't be true because a man, especially a middle aged betabuxxer, simply can't get a 25 year younger wife. Men don't have this option. Again, these are soap opera plots.I watched a colleague go the whole nine yards on this: he divorced his wife when she got breast cancer. They had 4 adult kids. Then he married a coworker who is 25 years younger & had two more kids with her. I can’t even look at the guy.
Another Thing I will throw into the mix before linking the big Whammy:
"Dying for Sex."
This is a podcast I discovered a while back. This 40 year old roastie got diagnosed with deadly cancer.
She divorced, went on a fuck spree and documented it in a series of podcasts.
I have listened to some of them, they are for free.
Highlights:
1. Bitch went on tinder after "elaborately engineering her profile with a friend." She didn't like the people she met (couple, bitch went for threesome right away).
Then she went on tinder again, 10 minutes later, matched, and fucked a dude on the toilet. No comment.
2. Another time she ended up fucking this dude who worked in a garage that services cars for celebrities. She said she got fucked in the backseat of one of the cars.
Reminder, she was a 40 year old dried up roastie with cancer.
Her on the right, left is the foid she made podcast with:
Here is the podcast. You can find it for full online:
Google Podcasts is niet meer beschikbaar
podcasts.google.com
Just scroll down, its six episodes, its all the ones with "Molly" (her).
There is also a book:
Amazon product ASIN B08FXVPQRCView: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08FXVPQRC/ref=as_sl_pc_qf_sp_asin_til?tag=dfsbook-20&linkCode=w00&linkId=9c0b7a6cc1fe2174c8c4d13fdf5a1df1&creativeASIN=B08FXVPQRC
Now, back to the Title of this Thread.
Drumroll
The study was bullshit.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?! NO WAY JOSE!
It was redacted later, they made a "coding error"
The Washington Post, which also covered the initial findings, said "when researchers at Bowling Green State tried to replicate the study results, they discovered the results were skewed by a mistake in the data, which counted people who left the study as divorces."
"They pointed out to us, to our horror, that we had miscoded the dependent variable," study author Amelia Karraker, professor at Iowa State University, told Retraction Watch. "As soon as we realized we made the mistake, we contacted the editor and told him what was happening, and said we made a mistake, we accept responsibility for it."
Study that found husbands prone to leave sick wives was flawed, researchers say
A coding error created a false conclusion in a study that found men may be more likely to bail on a marriage if the wife becomes sick, compared to if she's well. Researchers retracted the study.
www.deseret.com
So:
1. The researchers themselves did not detect the error, someone else did.
2. Intentional skewing of data, probably @WorthlessSlavicShit
That's it for now, have a good day everyone.
Last edited: