Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel "Men get more leeway then women"

MisanthropicMemes

MisanthropicMemes

Major
★★★★
Joined
Jun 4, 2024
Posts
2,312
:soy::soy::soy::soy:

1000006381
 
Also another hit from this frog sandnigger
1000006383
 
r/AskFeminists is just a sub where you get preached by feminists, they don't answer your questions, they want you to support feminism.
 
r/AskFeminists is just a sub where you get preached by feminists, they don't answer your questions, they want you to support feminism.
Check this fags profile hes a prime example of when you overdose on feminist theory koolaid
 
Total bullshit, and the fact that there are people who genuinely seem to believe that men are treated more leniently than women shows me that there are people with whom we honestly have no chance of even agreeing on basic reality.

Meanwhile, those are literally the first three (well, there was ne more in-between them but it was from the 90s) results from Google Scholar when you search for "gender sentence gap.":

This paper uses the universe of convictions in France between 2000 and 2003 to document the gender gap in sentencing. It reveals three main findings. First, during this period, and after controlling for very precise descriptions of the offences as well as other observable characteristics, women received prison sentences that were 15 days shorter, on average, than those of men who committed comparable offences. This represents a 33% decrease relative to the average sentence length in the sample (45 days in the entire sample). Second, this gender gap is also observed for mixed-gender pairs of criminals (one man and one woman) who are convicted together, on the same day, by the same person and for the same crime.


Overall, we find that female defendants receive more lenient sentence outcomes than their male counterparts. Legal factors account for a large portion of the gender differences, but even after controlling for legal characteristics a substantial gap in sentencing outcomes remains.


Results indicate that gender disparities in sex offender sentencing exist and are pervasive across sex offense types. Specifically, male sex offenders are more likely to be sentenced to prison, and given longer terms, than female sex offenders. Findings are similar across sex offense severity and whether the offense involved a minor victim.

These findings suggest that female sex offenders are treated more leniently than their matched male counterparts, even in instances of more serious sex offenses and those involving minor victims.


If courts treat men more harshly than women, why wouldn't ordinary people do so as well? In fact, I remember reading that, while the most common person to kill a woman was her partner, for a man, the most common was his friends, and that got me thinking, how many of those murders wouldn't happen if the guys in those cases were women? Since a lot of guys will happily give much more leeway to their female friends than male ones. For example, if a female friend slaps a guy's butt it will probably just make him horny and happy that she might find him attractive, while if a male friend does it it very much can lead to a fight that could escalate to murder.
 
Leeway? @Uggo Mongo @LeFrenchCel @proudweeb can you sue this bitch for using your trademarked word?
 
Total bullshit, and the fact that there are people who genuinely seem to believe that men are treated more leniently than women shows me that there are people with whom we honestly have no chance of even agreeing on basic reality.

Meanwhile, those are literally the first three (well, there was ne more in-between them but it was from the 90s) results from Google Scholar when you search for "gender sentence gap.":










If courts treat men more harshly than women, why wouldn't ordinary people do so as well? In fact, I remember reading that, while the most common person to kill a woman was her partner, for a man, the most common was his friends, and that got me thinking, how many of those murders wouldn't happen if the guys in those cases were women? Since a lot of guys will happily give much more leeway to their female friends than male ones. For example, if a female friend slaps a guy's butt it will probably just make him horny and happy that she might find him attractive, while if a male friend does it it very much can lead to a fight that could escalate to murder.
Check this fags profile hes a prime example of when you overdose on feminist theory koolaid
 
The soy overload on that retard's profile nearly killed me.

Also another hit from this frog sandniggerView attachment 1454290
I always wonder how those types of soymen would react to knowing that nonwhites have mass enslaved whites as well, but I'm not as curious as to stoop so low as to make a R*ddit account:feelsUgh:.

1748216374808
 
Total bullshit, and the fact that there are people who genuinely seem to believe that men are treated more leniently than women shows me that there are people with whom we honestly have no chance of even agreeing on basic reality.

Meanwhile, those are literally the first three (well, there was ne more in-between them but it was from the 90s) results from Google Scholar when you search for "gender sentence gap.":










If courts treat men more harshly than women, why wouldn't ordinary people do so as well? In fact, I remember reading that, while the most common person to kill a woman was her partner, for a man, the most common was his friends, and that got me thinking, how many of those murders wouldn't happen if the guys in those cases were women? Since a lot of guys will happily give much more leeway to their female friends than male ones. For example, if a female friend slaps a guy's butt it will probably just make him horny and happy that she might find him attractive, while if a male friend does it it very much can lead to a fight that could escalate to murder.
Lmao stats dont matter to faggots like this this same exact redditor literally said once "you cant say men on average are objectively stronger than womem because thats rendered untrue the moment one woman is stronger than any man (he used an example of a female wrestler being stronger than elon" kek this dude is a joke
 
JFL. They think that people pushing accountability onto women is sexism! Reminds me of the post I made the other day. They're always under the impression that they have no control of their emotions and desires. If you try to suggest they should take accountability they accuse you of being a bigot.
Total bullshit, and the fact that there are people who genuinely seem to believe that men are treated more leniently than women shows me that there are people with whom we honestly have no chance of even agreeing on basic reality.

Meanwhile, those are literally the first three (well, there was ne more in-between them but it was from the 90s) results from Google Scholar when you search for "gender sentence gap.":










If courts treat men more harshly than women, why wouldn't ordinary people do so as well? In fact, I remember reading that, while the most common person to kill a woman was her partner, for a man, the most common was his friends, and that got me thinking, how many of those murders wouldn't happen if the guys in those cases were women? Since a lot of guys will happily give much more leeway to their female friends than male ones. For example, if a female friend slaps a guy's butt it will probably just make him horny and happy that she might find him attractive, while if a male friend does it it very much can lead to a fight that could escalate to murder.
Girls also get better grades than boys even if they perform worse. https://www.the-sietch.com/index.ph...r-for-identical-work-to-boys-oecd-study.3467/
Cornwell found that boys in all racial categories are not being “commensurately graded by their teachers” in any subject “as their test scores would predict.”

The answer lies in the way teachers, who are statistically mostly women, evaluate students without reference to objective test scores. Boys are regularly graded well below their actual academic performance.

Boys are falling significantly behind in grades, “despite performing as least as well as girls on math tests, and significantly better on science tests.”

After fifth grade, he found, student assessment becomes a matter of “a teacher’s subjective assessment of the student’s performance”, and is further removed from the guidance of objective test results. Teachers, he says, tend to assess students on non-cognitive, “socio-emotional skills.” This has had a significant impact on boys’ later achievement because, while objective test scores are important, it is teacher-assigned grades that determine a child’s future with class placement, high school graduation and college admissibility.
Eliminating the factor of “non-cognitive skills…almost eliminates the estimated gender gap in reading grades”, Cornwell found. He said he found it “surprising” that although boys out-perform girls on math and science test scores, girls out-perform boys on teacher-assigned grades.

The report also found that:
  • At primary level 85% of teachers are female. This has remained roughly the same since 2003.
  • At secondary level the percentage of male teachers has fallen steadily at first and later precipitously from 40% in 2003 to 31.7% in 2012.
It has been shown that boys and girls do better in reading when they have a same sex teacher. Just one year with a male teacher reduced the reading gap by 1/3 for 13 year old boys. It has als been shown
 
JFL. They think that people pushing accountability onto women is sexism! Reminds me of the post I made the other day. They're always under the impression that they have no control of their emotions and desires. If you try to suggest they should take accountability they accuse you of being a bigot.

Women also get better grades than men even if they perform worse. https://www.the-sietch.com/index.ph...r-for-identical-work-to-boys-oecd-study.3467/
This redditor nigger is a male JFL

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1ktdpqs/comment/muil5rq/?context=3


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1kvbg4y/comment/mu9gjip/?context=3


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1kw5qx4/comment/muh8upk/?context=3
@WorthlessSlavicShit @Kamanbert thoughts on these arguments (sociology slop needs to be shat on more)

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1kvbg4y/comment/mu8baul/?context=3https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1kv74ru/comment/mu7gz6g/?context=3


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAnon/comments/1kt8x2e/comment/mtt85a4/?context=3
 

Dunno what to even say about stuff like that, the sheer privilege and shelteredness that emanates from each of the guy's posts simply make it clear that he wouldn't understand the real world if it slapped him in the face. 100% he's exactly the type to think that white people invented slavery, or that slavery in non-European cultures wasn't hereditary before they had contact with Europeans who introduced them to that concept (both of those things I've seen liberals say:feelsUnreal:).
 
You're better off talking to chatgpt then a feminist.
 

Similar threads

Rapistcel
Replies
19
Views
338
erenyeager
erenyeager
Notkev
Replies
4
Views
303
Poopless One
Poopless One
stalkerKiller
Replies
11
Views
448
LWii
L
RealSchizo
Replies
6
Views
562
Mecoja
Mecoja

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top