tehgymcel420
Fesikhcel From Zabbaleen
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2017
- Posts
- 24,577
They would worship you instead of cows.Imagine moving to India.
They would worship you instead of cows.Imagine moving to India.
This is fucked up. it is sad to see how colonization fucked up curryland and poisoned them,turned them into white worshippers..
Wouldn't be happening if ethnic subhumans weren't coming to the west en mass and increasing inceldom 1000 fold among white men.
I agree.Ethnics shouldn't exist they should of been wiped out by wars and genetic selection.
Bhai I have read the holy scriptures both ram and Krishna are sawala , dark skinned but are depicted as blue in modern artwork. Vishnu was blue skinned not ram or Krishna.Rama was never described as having dark skin. But blue colored? Yes. I read somewhere he was described to have blonde hair and blue eyes. Kali was depicted to have black skin because that's her demonic form. Black is always associated with something dark and sinister. Asuras are always said to have dark skinned, hairy and muscular.
Sawala/Shyama means light brown.
The blue skin has different interpretations:
1. Blue is the color of the sky, blue color resembles infiniteness/formlessness.
2. Humans don't have blue skin, therefore blue skin means something super-human.
3. Gods have transparent skin (lighter than white) and their blood is blue, hence some gods look blue, etc.
Blue color has nothing to do with black/dark skin.
In terms of historicity. Vedic religion (proto-hinduism) was originated in northern Syria and they were mostly whites. According to the Aryan Invation Theory (AIT), early Vedic people from the middle east conquered India and pushed all the native black people to the south of India. Those native black people are depicted as "demons" or "Asuras".
Native Indian black people had a flourishing civilization in Mohenjo-daro (and Harappa) and they were destroyed by the proto-Hindus from the middle east.
White women hate white men and are eager to be seen as tolerant and progressive by fucking/dating refugees and immigrants.How come a bunch of subhumans can cause inceldom among whites? What the fuck does this even mean?
White women hate white men and are eager to be seen as tolerant and progressive by fucking/dating refugees and immigrants.
White women hate white men and are eager to be seen as tolerant and progressive by fucking/dating refugees and immigrants.
They don't care if the refugee is ugly or not. It isn't about looks. They want to be seen as progressive and liberal and they want to destroy white men.Do you understand that those refugees and immigrants are mostly ugly as fuck right? So do you mean women prefer ugly men over an average white male? Or do they fuck good looking immigrants and refugees? I don't understand.
It isn't about looks. And yes, many white women do prefer ugly refugees over average white men.
No, I'm not. This is the ultimate blackpill of female nature. They have no in group loyalty and are slaves to trends and the status quo. It's trendy right now to hate on white men and fuck/date refugees so that is exactly what they're doing.Man, I don't know what to say at this point. Your delusion is beyond repair. You are just rejecting the entire paradigm of blackpill science.
Ethnics shouldn't exist they should of been wiped out by wars and genetic selection.
Where is my fucking worship then? All I get is scorn and resentment from fellow whites and ethnics alike.Damn, there you go.