Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel (Media) White American Expats are treated like royalty in India

rabitter

rabitter

Incel Blanquist
★★★★
Joined
Mar 12, 2018
Posts
4,271
Potent suicidefuel for currycels. The Curry Homeland is being colonized once again.

https://qz.com/india/1414490/white-american-expats-are-treated-like-royalty-in-india/



VI0JW8Y.png


VIP
Sometimes, I’ll walk into a fancy restaurant and be treated like royalty.
Despite wearing a sun-faded t-shirt, oil-stained shorts, and chappals that look like an elephant used them to walk around.
It’s curious. At times I enjoy it and play along, using elaborate language and speaking in an American accent rather than the neutral one I’ve developed over my many years of living abroad.
Other times, I’d love to just be like one of the locals and not be treated any differently.
But the fun thing about it is that I can get away with wearing whatever I want—something I wouldn’t feel comfortable with if I were in the US.

It truly is over for curries. Even the Nehas and Priyas of India want Chad and only Chad. Not even Chadpreet is enough for them:
sg.jpg

^She's a well-known FEMALE journalist in Curryland.
 
This is fucked up. it is sad to see how colonization fucked up curryland and poisoned them,turned them into white worshippers..

 
White man conquered them, brutalised them, starved them and yet they still worship him. Same applies to ALL ethnics worldwide
 
White men are scums indeed.Even after all those years of plundering the Cathay and Hindustan they are still not satisfied and now choose to steal whatever women tehy can find from the Third World.
 
White man conquered them, brutalised them, starved them and yet they still worship him. Same applies to ALL ethnics worldwide
Cope. We infinitely improved the material standards of that and every other country we entered. Doesn't mean it's justified, but the narrative that we simply sucked every contintent dry of resources and provided nothing in return is patently absurd and not to mention wrong
 
Meh. Even if I was a whitecel I wouldn't risk going to curryland. They're low inhib as fuck and won't hesitate to chop you up at some back alley to rob you 10$
 
White men are scums indeed.Even after all those years of plundering the Cathay and Hindustan they are still not satisfied and now choose to steal whatever women tehy can find from the Third World.
Chad doesn’t need to go to third world shitholes to get a girlfriend. Only average or below average white scum do that
 
White incels hate ethnic white worshiping as much as anyone, fun fact.
 
Cope. We infinitely improved the material standards of that and every other country we entered. Doesn't mean it's justified, but the narrative that we simply sucked every contintent dry of resources and provided nothing in return is patently absurd and not to mention wrong
>DUDE WE BUILT A ROAD LOL
:feelsseriously:
 
>DUDE WE BUILT A ROAD LOL
:feelsseriously:
Funny how the countries we most recently colonized in sub saharan Africa are also the richest in that region. It's almost as if bringing civilization, infrastructure and industries has an impact on GDP
 
>DUDE WE BUILT A ROAD LOL
:feelsseriously:
Tbh whitey really outdone themselves in India.Without British intervention modern curries would've been dragged into an eternal civil war between Mohammedans and sacred cow cultists
 
Tagging all curries and honorary curries @chudur-budur @rahultmnt @RREEEEEEEEE @RageAgainstTDL @Eskimocel
Tbh whitey really outdone themselves in India.Without British intervention modern curries would've been dragged into an eternal civil war between Mohammedans and sacred cow cultists
That would have been far better. At least that conflict would've produced warzone-maxxed Chads. Not to mention it would've allowed curries to migrate to Sweden and become Chadfugees.
White incels hate ethnic white worshiping as much as anyone, fun fact.
The only reason they claim to hate it because it exposes their volcel status.
 
The Curry Homeland is being colonized once again.

Ah so when whites go to a non-white country its muh evil colonialism but when ethnics arrive in white countries in the millions its just run of the mill immigration and only evil white supremacists oppose it?
 
Ah so when whites go to a non-white country its muh evil colonialism but when ethnics arrive in white countries in the millions its just run of the mill immigration and only evil white supremacists oppose it?
Because ethnics are bottom of the barrel in white society while whites are automatically seen and treated like gods in ethnic society. The very article in my OP proves this.

You = brainlet IQ.
 
Funny how the countries we most recently colonized in sub saharan Africa are also the richest in that region. It's almost as if bringing civilization, infrastructure and industries has an impact on GDP
Are you talking about South Africa? Because that country wasn’t the most recently decolonized in Africa. And it’s quickly becoming irrelevant even though the glorious white race still owns most of the country

My point was that a few railroads that the British built for themselves doesn’t match up with all of the resources that were hoovered up, the Human Resources that were sent to fight European wars and the famine that was engineered to make way for WW2
Tbh whitey really outdone themselves in India.Without British intervention modern curries would've been dragged into an eternal civil war between Mohammedans and sacred cow cultists
That’s what they’re in the middle of right now
 
Ethnics, why are you worshipping the white man? Why don’t you stone them to death since they are stealing your women?
 
>retweeted by hinduIDF
 
Are you talking about South Africa? Because that country wasn’t the most recently decolonized in Africa. And it’s quickly becoming irrelevant even though the glorious white race still owns most of the country

My point was that a few railroads that the British built for themselves doesn’t match up with all of the resources that were hoovered up, the Human Resources that were sent to fight European wars and the famine that was engineered to make way for WW2

That’s what they’re in the middle of right now
You would have to specify what resources, how much, and how it fails to compare. I'd argue that bringing India hundreds of years into the future overwhelmingly compensates for whatever resources that was extracted. Until either of us can provide substantial evidence for our claims, whatever we say is irrelevant.

Here's a video that empirically analyzes exactly what "the british" did
 
>retweeted by hinduIDF
It's a real tweet mate, just do a google search for "Indian men" + "Sagarika Ghose". She deleted it but you can find other places that mentioned it.
 
You would have to specify what resources, how much, and how it fails to compare. I'd argue that bringing India hundreds of years into the future overwhelmingly compensates for whatever resources that was extracted
>hundreds of years into the future
[JFL]

do you actually think that millions of dead Indians can compare with a few shit railroads that the British built for themselves, to transport tea and other shit can compare?
 
Because ethnics are bottom of the barrel in white society while whites are automatically seen and treated like gods in ethnic society.
Ethnics 'treat white people like gods' by their own volition, whites are forced by law in white countries to tiptoe around ethnics as to not offend them in any way. Ethnics are not "bottom of the barrel in white society" by default, the ones that are bottom of the barrel are there by their own doing.
 
>hundreds of years into the future
[JFL]

do you actually think that millions of dead Indians can compare with a few shit railroads that the British built for themselves, to transport tea and other shit can compare?
was it 6 million?
 
Ah so when whites go to a non-white country its muh evil colonialism but when ethnics arrive in white countries in the millions its just run of the mill immigration and only evil white supremacists oppose it?
It's interesting how whites are so willing to allow their race to dwindle and their culture to be destroyed. I'm genuinely curious as to what makes them different. Perhaps it's a result of possessing too much empathy to allow for their propagation anymore, or maybe they understand that their value of genetic similarity and attachment to constructs like culture and nation are completely meaningless. However, these would have to be recent changes, as Europe was very different even just a century ago.

The irony is that if whites do vanish in the future as stormfrontcels claim, then what could've been their potential decedents will be spared from existence, and the children of people who continue to conqueror and procreate will be the true losers. Zapffe put it best, continuing to spread the pain and futility of human existence only happens if you're deluding yourself.
 
was it 6 million?
2.1 million died of starvation in 1943 so that the British could take on your precious 3rd Reich

1.7 million served the British empire in WW1
74K died for Britain

2.5 million served Britain in WW2
87K+ died for Britain

>b-but we built some roads bro we gud bois
 
2.1 million died of starvation in 1943 so that the British could take on your precious 3rd Reich

1.7 million served the British empire in WW1
74K died for Britain

2.5 million served Britain in WW2
87K+ died for Britain

>b-but we built some roads bro we gud bois
2.1 million died of starvation in 1943 so that the British could take on your precious 3rd Reich

1.7 million served the British empire in WW1
74K died for Britain

2.5 million served Britain in WW2
87K+ died for Britain

>b-but we built some roads bro we gud bois
developing a nation hundreds of years into the future =/= "building some roads"

Also, do you have any idea how important infrastructure is for a nation's development? Why do you think one of the first things that was done to promote economic growth in the industrial revolution was expanding and building out the network of railroads in Europe and in the New world?
 
developing a nation hundreds of years into the future =/= "building some roads"

Also, do you have any idea how important infrastructure is for a nation's development? Why do you think one of the first things that was done to promote economic growth in the industrial revolution was expanding and building out the network of railroads in Europe and in the New world?
What makes you think colonialism pushed India “hundreds of years” into the future?

I’m well aware of the importance of infrastructure but I don’t exaggerate when I say “built some roads”
The roads (and railroads) were built for the British empire, Indians hardly had a say in any of those desicions and the British didn’t care for India’s advancement.

Why are you disregarding the figures I gave you? Millions of curries died because of the British, remember that
 
This thread shows once again, that the white man is all by himself. Everyone vs. white men
 
currycels and ricecels are truest of cels indeed. sorry whitecels, browncels and blackcels
 
2.1 million died of starvation in 1943 so that the British could take on your precious 3rd Reich

1.7 million served the British empire in WW1
74K died for Britain

2.5 million served Britain in WW2
87K+ died for Britain

>b-but we built some roads bro we gud bois

developing a nation hundreds of years into the future =/= "building some roads"

Also, do you have any idea how important infrastructure is for a nation's development? Why do you think one of the first things that was done to promote economic growth in the industrial revolution was expanding and building out the network of railroads in Europe and in the New world?


The Indian economy under the British Raj describes the economy of India during the years of the British Raj, from 1858 to 1947. During this period, according to British economist Angus Maddison, India's share of the world economy collapsed from 24.4% in 1700 to 4.2% in 1950.

Historians have questioned why India did not undergo industrialisation in the nineteenth century in the way that Britain did. In the seventeenth century, India was a relatively urbanised and commercialised nation with a buoyant export trade, devoted largely to cotton textiles, but also including silk, spices, and rice. India was the world's main producer of cotton textiles and had a substantial export trade to Britain, as well as many other European countries, via the East India Company. Yet as the British cotton industry underwent a technological revolution during the late 18th to early 19th centuries, the Indian industry stagnated and deindustrialized.[1]
 
Tagging all curries and honorary curries @chudur-budur @rahultmnt @RREEEEEEEEE @RageAgainstTDL @Eskimocel

That would have been far better. At least that conflict would've produced warzone-maxxed Chads. Not to mention it would've allowed curries to migrate to Sweden and become Chadfugees.

The only reason they claim to hate it because it exposes their volcel status.
I admit I can "get laid", without resorting to escorts. I'm almost sixty, childless, retired, well-off and starting in 2022 will collect $2000 a month for life. I'll be NEETing most neatly. That makes me "attractive" to a large number of women, and even larger numbers elsewhere in the world.
Frankly, I'm just not that interested.
 
hating white people because of brits is retarded.
just hate brits. no nation on earth deserves it more.
 
The Indian economy under the British Raj describes the economy of India during the years of the British Raj, from 1858 to 1947. During this period, according to British economist Angus Maddison, India's share of the world economy collapsed from 24.4% in 1700 to 4.2% in 1950.

Historians have questioned why India did not undergo industrialisation in the nineteenth century in the way that Britain did. In the seventeenth century, India was a relatively urbanised and commercialised nation with a buoyant export trade, devoted largely to cotton textiles, but also including silk, spices, and rice. India was the world's main producer of cotton textiles and had a substantial export trade to Britain, as well as many other European countries, via the East India Company. Yet as the British cotton industry underwent a technological revolution during the late 18th to early 19th centuries, the Indian industry stagnated and deindustrialized.[1]
“hundreds of years into the future br0000”
:lul::lul:
 
whites are forced by law
"Law" isn't some amorphous, non-living entity. 90%+ of the judges and lawyers in all western countries are white.

Might as well say:
'whites were forced by whites'...
 
The Indian economy under the British Raj describes the economy of India during the years of the British Raj, from 1858 to 1947. During this period, according to British economist Angus Maddison, India's share of the world economy collapsed from 24.4% in 1700 to 4.2% in 1950.

Historians have questioned why India did not undergo industrialisation in the nineteenth century in the way that Britain did. In the seventeenth century, India was a relatively urbanised and commercialised nation with a buoyant export trade, devoted largely to cotton textiles, but also including silk, spices, and rice. India was the world's main producer of cotton textiles and had a substantial export trade to Britain, as well as many other European countries, via the East India Company. Yet as the British cotton industry underwent a technological revolution during the late 18th to early 19th centuries, the Indian industry stagnated and deindustrialized.[1]
“hundreds of years into the future br0000”
:lul::lul:
 
White man conquered them, brutalised them, starved them and yet they still worship him. Same applies to ALL ethnics worldwide
it's not worship if you're an honorary aryan shitskin, nothing like a brown manlet crying about the white birthrate and le redpilling everyone on black criminality and low iq
 
white men should have fucking finished the job ... curries are a mistake
 
This is fucked up. it is sad to see how colonization fucked up curryland and poisoned them,turned them into white worshippers..
Nothing to do with colonization you fucking giga coper JFL. Physical markers of beauty are objective. Oh yeah, I'm sure with enough effort you can socialize anyone to be attracted to a morbidly obese, balding, 5'2'', ugly faced Indian janitor.
Funny how the countries we most recently colonized in sub saharan Africa are also the richest in that region. It's almost as if bringing civilization, infrastructure and industries has an impact on GDP

Don't bother bro, you're arguing with a disingenuous kike (JFL @Rabbi✡Stenowitz you archetypal subversive rat) and a bunch of brainwashed deathniks regarding a history they know nothing about.
 
Last edited:
Imagine moving to India.
:lul::lul::lul:
 
Bhai it's really bad here , people worship white skin even though our gods have dark skin
White man conquered them, brutalised them, starved them and yet they still worship him. Same applies to ALL ethnics worldwide
Feels bad man
#metoo
White man conquered them, brutalised them, starved them and yet they still worship him. Same applies to ALL ethnics worldwide
Feels bad man
#metoo
 
Meh. Even if I was a whitecel I wouldn't risk going to curryland. They're low inhib as fuck and won't hesitate to chop you up at some back alley to rob you 10$
 
Bhai it's really bad here , people worship white skin even though our gods have dark skin

Feels bad man
#metoo

Feels bad man
#metoo

Which male god has white skin? Except Shiva and Krishna, who have blue skin. Blue skin is another symbolism for "Aryan blue blood". You worship whites and demonize dark skins. All Asuras are dark skinned where Devas are white skinned.

White skinned Durga slays dark skinned Mahishasura.

durga_devi.jpg


White worshiping is ingrained deep in the curry culture.
 
Which male god has white skin? Except Shiva and Krishna, who have blue skin. Blue skin is another symbolism for "Aryan blue blood". You worship whites and demonize dark skins. All Asuras are dark skinned where Devas are white skinned.

White skinned Durga slays dark skinned Mahishasura.

durga_devi.jpg


White worshiping is ingrained deep in the curry culture.
Ram , Krishna , Kali are darked skinned there skin colour is sawala but due to hating dark skin we paint them blue. Also Shiva has white skin , his throat is blue because he drank poison.

This guy has ignored alot or facts even though the production of what the Weaver's were producing increased the specialized works they produced werent allowed to be exported and they couldn't sell it to other trading companies hence the British made them sell cheap shit and not the fancy shit they were fancy for bankrupting them , British increased the farm lands by cutting Forrest's and taking the land of the locals and forced them to cash crops such as indigo which made the land infertile and though the Bengal famine was not started by the British Churchill did deny the dying bengali's ration which was in India and instead saved the food as reserve ration which resulted in the deathtoll of millions.

Ignores the research of actual historians and uses wikipedia as his source okay can seems legit , how retarded are Mayo's. Hurrdurr colonization a process in which forced a country to work for the benefits of our country is good for that country , why are so many migrants coming in our countries.
 
Last edited:
Ram , Krishna , Kali are darked skinned there skin colour is sawala but due to hating dark skin we paint them blue. Also Shiva has white skin , his throat is blue because he drank poison.

Rama was never described as having dark skin. But blue colored? Yes. I read somewhere he was described to have blonde hair and blue eyes. Kali was depicted to have black skin because that's her demonic form. Black is always associated with something dark and sinister. Asuras are always said to have dark skinned, hairy and muscular.

Sawala/Shyama means light brown.

The blue skin has different interpretations:

1. Blue is the color of the sky, blue color resembles infiniteness/formlessness.
2. Humans don't have blue skin, therefore blue skin means something super-human.
3. Gods have transparent skin (lighter than white) and their blood is blue, hence some gods look blue, etc.

Blue color has nothing to do with black/dark skin.

In terms of historicity. Vedic religion (proto-hinduism) was originated in northern Syria and they were mostly whites. According to the Aryan Invation Theory (AIT), early Vedic people from the middle east conquered India and pushed all the native black people to the south of India. Those native black people are depicted as "demons" or "Asuras".

Native Indian black people had a flourishing civilization in Mohenjo-daro (and Harappa) and they were destroyed by the proto-Hindus from the middle east.
 
White men are scums indeed.Even after all those years of plundering the Cathay and Hindustan they are still not satisfied and now choose to steal whatever women tehy can find from the Third World.
Wouldn't be happening if ethnic subhumans weren't coming to the west en mass and increasing inceldom 1000 fold among white men. Also you're subversive parasites who have no respect for western culture or way of life and you refuse to assimilate. At least whites in non white countries try to blend in and have some respect for them.

You reap what you sow.
 

Similar threads

Eremetic
It's Over ASTROTURFING
Replies
6
Views
665
Grotesque Deformity
Grotesque Deformity
Eremetic
Replies
3
Views
367
Adolf Kitler
Adolf Kitler

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top