Mathematical proof of women choosing tall men not by 'chance'

[WizardofSoda]

Let us say a girl has just had 2 boyfriend both of whom were in the top 20% of height for men. So a 1/5 chance * a 1/5 chance = a 1/25 chance that this is by random chance, and not by the woman choosing tall men over short men.

So at 1/25 we couldn't completely dismiss the possibility that this was by chance.

But say she has had 6 boyfriends in the past and all of them are in the top 20% height for men. That is a 1/15,625 chance of it being random. The reasonable man has to say that the woman has some sort of sick, weird fetish for tall men, and that she is not sexually attracted to non-tall men.

 

[I want to believe]

Holes want the best men in height, appearance, cock size. They are just animals.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Its like the fuckwits who say that they know tons of short guys with girlfriends when being short is a negative minority.

 

[Deleted member 29115]

It's gaslighting, I'm just glad to figure things out at the ripe age of 20

 

[WizardofSoda]

If you accept determinism, you know that nothing is arbitrary or "by chance".

Ya exactly.. probability is used in complex systems, because there is many variables and factors which we currently just do not know or at least fully know.

To prove causation we do it if the chances of that occurrence being through random chance become increasingly remote. Even if it is 1 in a million we can say that it is in a 'theoretical' sense possible that is by chance, but the reasonable man takes the position that this is causative.

Whereas the normie always takes the position that 'it could also be by chance', same reason normies buy lottery tickets.

 

[VictoryOrDeath]

So a 1/5 chance * a 1/5 chance = a 1/25 chance that this is by random chance

Shitty reasoning ngl.

Even if the conclusion is right

 

[grondilu]

If you accept determinism, you know that nothing is arbitrary or "by chance".

Not really. Determinism leaves room for randomness and thus to coincidences.

Its not. It just appears probabilistic and entropic to us because we lack sufficient information to comprehensively map out full the chain of events.

It's not just that. Even simple systems can evolve in ways that are just too complicated to be fully computable. It is very possible that the only entity that can compute the evolution of the universe is the universe itself.

Rule 30 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A system can be determinist but with a dynamics so complex that for all intents and purposes it might as well be random.

 

[grondilu]

Do you even know the definition of determinism?

I'm pretty sure I do. What we may be disagreeing on are the meanings of "arbitrary" and "random".

As you said yourself our ignorance of the exact state of the universe prevents us from making predictions. This alone leaves room for concepts of randomness and arbitrariness.

 

[BITG]

Holes want the best men in height, appearance, cock size. They are just animals.

 

[Deleted member 18193]

https://incels.is/threads/holy-fuck-look-at-this-insane-heightpill.244613/

 

[Gymcelled]

Not really. Determinism leaves room for randomness and thus to coincidences.



It's not just that. Even simple systems can evolve in ways that are just too complicated to be fully computable. It is very possible that the only entity that can compute the evolution of the universe is the universe itself.

Rule 30 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A system can be determinist but with a dynamics so complex that for all intents and purposes it might as well be random.

You always have interesting wikipedia links

 

[grondilu]

You always have interesting wikipedia links

Thanks. That's going to be a difficult reputation to live up to, but I'll try