Serious Marryng a virgin is no different than marryng a pornstar

[Drakul]

People aren't defined only by what they do but more importantly by what they wish, crave and long for and when it comes to that both your trad virgin girl and Lana Rhoades want the exact same thing : a dude that's the complete opposite of you. If rightfully so the past is important the present is even more fundamental and the present is her pussy wetting itself obscenely while Chad eyefucks her while you're both walking outside/buying stuff. In a fraction of second he makes her feel more alive than you ever will in thousands of lives. Complete defeat.

Accepting that she's blowing him in her mind just cause she doesn't act on her fantasy is laughable. Why do you think normies hate pedophile/minor attracted people even if they don't act on their desires l? Cause to them the desire itself is so vile, spineless and detestable that you're now a monster.

If normans can arrive instinctually at this fundamental concept I don't see why I should tolerate cock craving sluts that just suppress their instinct but that deep inside consider you a second choice.

It's loneliness or cuckoldry when you truly understand how things work.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

If she has never had chad cock, she desires it less. If society has engrained in her mind that cheating is social suicide, she will be more scared and hesitant to fantasies about it.
Even if this is not the case, and even if fantasysing is an act that both theoretical women share to the exact same extent, there is the small additional detail of one of the women having fucked countless dudes on camera and the other one having her first and up till now only time with me.
If you think these differences don't matter at all, I think you have lost all nuance.
And I'm not even invested in marrying a virgin girl. My chances are already 0, why multiply them by 0 one more time