The Notorious SLAV
Foid Oppression Denial Division Commander
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2022
- Posts
- 21,547
- Online time
- 2d 21h
Minimal differences in prevalence but notable differences in negative outcomes? Every single time we have a gender switched version of it, people latch onto the latter to claim that it's a "gendered issue mainly affecting women", so I guess we should apply the same logic here, just with the opposite conclusion
.
They repeat it twice to make sure that we get the message that there is a notable gender difference when it comes to harassment in a way where foids I'd guess are more targeted, which is when it comes to harassment from faculty members. Which is fair, but when you realize that they are probably counting some random jokes from 60+-year-old professors which wouldn't be controversial even 10 years ago as this "harassment", it gets a bit underwhelming
.
Though if my wild guess here is correct and women really report less serious stuff men wouldn't even think about, that could explain why the men who do report it also claim worse effects on their lives
.
.
This study investigates the characteristics of male victims of campus sexual harassment, revealing that there is little difference in the proportion of male and female victims. Both genders are subjected to sexual harassment by students, faculty members, and off-campus personnel, with the largest difference in frequency being 13.79% and the smallest 0.06%. Most forms of harassment show less than a 5.00% difference between male and female students. T-test results indicate that, except for harassment by faculty members, there is no significant difference in the frequency of harassment between genders (p > .05).
Unheard Voices: Understanding Male Victims of Campus Sexual Harassment in a Gender-Inclusive StudyRegression model and Shapley value decomposition analyses reveal that gender significantly influences the frequency of harassment, particularly when the perpetrator is the faculty member. Overall, this study highlights the need for increased attention to male victims of campus sexual harassment and the importance of addressing gender differences in coping strategies.
They repeat it twice to make sure that we get the message that there is a notable gender difference when it comes to harassment in a way where foids I'd guess are more targeted, which is when it comes to harassment from faculty members. Which is fair, but when you realize that they are probably counting some random jokes from 60+-year-old professors which wouldn't be controversial even 10 years ago as this "harassment", it gets a bit underwhelming
Though if my wild guess here is correct and women really report less serious stuff men wouldn't even think about, that could explain why the men who do report it also claim worse effects on their lives
UnsurprisingFurthermore, male victims are more likely to be familiar with the perpetrators than female victims. Campus sexual harassment negatively impacts both genders, with male victims reporting higher negative effects in academic, social, and self-evaluation aspects. Male victims are less likely to take proactive measures or seek assistance when facing harassment.





