Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

low birthrate contributes to inceldom

nklfdnblidnfbli

nklfdnblidnfbli

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Posts
278
men aged 18-59 are competing for women aged 18-30. this is why the low birthrate is affecting the gender ratio and ramping up hypergamy. the same thing is happening in japan where there are more older people than younger people and you hear about things like guys just giving up and going hikkomori. things will get worse in the future as the birthrate drops, we need incel rebellion now.
 
Feminism ensures that women can opt out of betabux contracts and take chads so long as they have a career. They only feel like having shitspawn when their biological clock goes off
 
lowiqcel, the bigger population is the more incels there will be, look at china they have 30 million more males than females, POOland has 300 less females than males i wonder how many of them are incel and never had romantic relationship (prob 80% of them)
 
Its just luck man.
Just be lucky bruh.
 
you are coping.

in an isolated classroom, there are already clear signs of the pareto principle in action

women will always gravitude to the 20%
lowiqcel, the bigger population is the more incels there will be, look at china they have 30 million more males than females, POOland has 300 less females than males i wonder how many of them are incel and never had romantic relationship (prob 80% of them)

a6b707ba567ab7af161ad6713bd2a27f.png
 
i'm not saying low birthrate is the only cause of the problem but it's making things worse by making the gender ratio worse.
 
i'm not saying low birthrate is the only cause of the problem but it's making things worse by making the gender ratio worse.

incorrect, the gender balance does not exist in many countries barring india and china

the balance is always 50/50 for the most part, this is a mathematical principle of randomness

due to human innovations, men are not dying therefore women have an excess of men to chose from whereas in nature only the fittest men proved themselves capable of competing and surviving

blame humanity for creating a society where our competition can't be killed off

the blackpill is that the majority of male lions die starved or killed, this is observed in most social species

humans bypassed this by enabling the gender balance to remain at 50/50 as no one is dying from the environment or from being murdered. in nature, the balance is always lower males and higher females. maybe 20/80, 30/70, 40/60 thereby causing harems to exist

humans and primates cucked themselves, just look at the same of the male penis, it's meant to scoop out the sperm of other men :feelskek: and females can fuck every dude they want and no one will figure out who the baby daddy is
 
the balance is always 50/50 for the most part, this is a mathematical principle of randomness

yes the balance is 50/50 overall but if there are more older people than younger people (due to a low birthrate) then there will be more men in the dating pool because there are more older men in the dating pool
 
yes the balance is 50/50 overall but if there are more older people than younger people (due to a low birthrate) then there will be more men in the dating pool because there are more older men in the dating pool

females breeding with older males is a statistical majority across most species, you're making the mistake of conflating low value men competing with high value men

you're supposed to actually gain value to attract younger women because this is the statistical truth

of course this doesnt really work if you're short ugly or a minority but those are statisical outliers

in terms of standard deviation you just have to be below, average or slightly above average to be able to attract a mate
 
incorrect, the gender balance does not exist in many countries barring india and china

the balance is always 50/50 for the most part, this is a mathematical principle of randomness

due to human innovations, men are not dying therefore women have an excess of men to chose from whereas in nature only the fittest men proved themselves capable of competing and surviving

blame humanity for creating a society where our competition can't be killed off

the blackpill is that the majority of male lions die starved or killed, this is observed in most social species

humans bypassed this by enabling the gender balance to remain at 50/50 as no one is dying from the environment or from being murdered. in nature, the balance is always lower males and higher females. maybe 20/80, 30/70, 40/60 thereby causing harems to exist

humans and primates cucked themselves, just look at the same of the male penis, it's meant to scoop out the sperm of other men :feelskek: and females can fuck every dude they want and no one will figure out who the baby daddy is

You are super low iq cel, gender balance is NEVER 50/50, it's always 5-7% higher for males than females.

Men premature deaths are way more common for males than females, i'm talking about accidents while working, dying while serving at army, heart attacks, cancer is much more frequent in males than females, addictions which goes in hand with depression and suicide.

"men are 40 per cent more likely to die from cancer than women overall, and 16 per cent more likely to get the disease."

Females are way more resistant against any form of sickness like cancer or caused by viruses than men, yeah we are stronger, taller and more intelligent but it comes at the price.

"Just kill 90% of men bro" you behave like feminist, even if you kill majority of men women would still wouldn't want to fuck your ugly ass, they would rather want to fuck dogs or turn "lesbian", this happens when femoid doesn't have chad nearby.

To achieve that you would need to eugenic and abort majority of men and it would still be pointless, since (((they))) need beta cucks to work for roasties.

Also more femoids than males = Socialists/marxists would always win in election.
 
Last edited:
blame governments for trying to make smoking, opioids, and recreational drugs illegal

if they weren't completely fucking retarded, they'd give out free drugs to men
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top