N
NeverSubmit
Admiral
★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2017
- Posts
- 2,830
Some people on here and websites like lookism.net worship this idea of a looks scale. I'm here to tell you the looks scale is BS! Of course if you are super good looking you will have success with women and if you're hideous you will be incel but the majority of people are somewhere in between. Just because somebody may be a 5 on the looks scale doesn't mean they can get laid there are plenty of average looking incels. The looks scale doesn't take into account location and race/phenotype. Location is everything if you are in an area where the people are uglier you are more likely to have success than if you're in an area that has better looking people. So yes locationcel is definitely a real thing. Also even if you're decent looking if you don't have the right phenotype you will be reduced to incel status in many cases. The most attractive phenotypes being Northern European and the least being Indians/South East Asians. A lot of girls will reject a guy based from his race/phenotype alone unless he is extremely good looking. You can't just compare a 5/10 Anglo Saxon guy and 5/10 ethnic guy and say they are the same. The 5/10 ethnic guy may be a 5/10 based on his facial features, height but the overwhelming majority women are going to pick the Anglo Saxon guy. It's an all or nothing game for men in today's society and unfortunately we are on the side of nothing.