Another blackpill for you buddy boyos, this time it’s related to wildlife conservation. Science is worried that people want to protect life based on how it looks, rather than its function to the ecosystem or anything else. Maybe those Pandas just personality maxed while the stinky endangered frogs need to take more showers (despite living in ponds).
nationalpost.com
This article says we are protecting animals for all the wrong reasons, but imagine if someone says that women are breeding for all the wrong reasons when only breeding with Chad, he would never work a day in his life again.
At least people are blackpilled about animal conservation being heavily affected by lookism, and there are even organizations dedicated to helping ugly animals survive, like the Ugly Animal Preservation Society.
Imagine if someone made the Ugly people mating society, that tries to help ugly males get mates through campaigns and propoganda. They would be the laughing stock of the world, and probably have depressed chadlites and normies trying to get in or getting the foundation cancelled.
Too cute to die? Experts say weâre too selective about species we choose to protect
Cute animals are more likely to be protected by conservationists than ugly animals, a recent study finds.
This article says we are protecting animals for all the wrong reasons, but imagine if someone says that women are breeding for all the wrong reasons when only breeding with Chad, he would never work a day in his life again.
At least people are blackpilled about animal conservation being heavily affected by lookism, and there are even organizations dedicated to helping ugly animals survive, like the Ugly Animal Preservation Society.
Imagine if someone made the Ugly people mating society, that tries to help ugly males get mates through campaigns and propoganda. They would be the laughing stock of the world, and probably have depressed chadlites and normies trying to get in or getting the foundation cancelled.
