This is long but worh the read:
(Long) Adam Lanza had a galactic IQ - he wrote this about how foids are selfish
Y
Can you at least attach an archive link of that file? Clicking on a pdf file directly isn't something everyone here wants to do.
Tallcel
he may be the worst looking tallfag ive ever seen, even faceandlms mogs the life out of him. hes frail and his eyes just bleed autism and whatever the complete reverse of neurotypical is.
6ft isnt even considered tall by females, its barely average for them
we dont need this autism here
G
that is galactic IQ indeed
Yeah legit. He is one of the strangest looking non deformed people I've ever seen. You hit the nail on the head, everything about him just "looks" autistic
Dunno if this is what you mean but this should work
I can't copy the text
Last edited:
Damn this guy really thought it through.. He got excellent vocabulary so he might had aspergers.
You know someone is good when he can convince you to something that is against your initial presupposition or atleast question it.
Chad doesn't think this much when it comes to women. He just fck them then move on.
You know someone is good when he can convince you to something that is against your initial presupposition or atleast question it.
Chad doesn't think this much when it comes to women. He just fck them then move on.
G
I am still trying to wrap my head around what he means exactly with his primary idea.
The idea is that foids think of themselves rather than the group.
But which scenario does he actually mean with that?
In the first example he says men would say "they are shooting people", while women would say "they are shooting me".
What I don't understand about Adam Lanza's interpretation is which "me" he means that women mean because there are 2 types of "me" in this case.
Either the woman reduces the group down to herself, so when the group is being attacked, only she matters and all the harm done to the group is reduced in a non-empathetical way by means of self-victimization or theft/parasitism of the feelings of entitlement from the harm done to the group. Thus "me" refers more to herself as invidual only and only to the group as an opportunistic means to feed off of the groups resources.
The other possible "me" would be a generalization of the woman onto the group. So that if the group is attacked, the woman empathetically thinks of the group as extension of herself so that if the group is harmed, she too feels the harm as if it was done to herself. This is a positive perspective of the same idea of selfishness.
in other words do women see themselves as the group or do they see the group as part of themselves.
It's obvious that the former is the case. But I'm not sure which one Lanza means.
The idea is that foids think of themselves rather than the group.
But which scenario does he actually mean with that?
In the first example he says men would say "they are shooting people", while women would say "they are shooting me".
What I don't understand about Adam Lanza's interpretation is which "me" he means that women mean because there are 2 types of "me" in this case.
Either the woman reduces the group down to herself, so when the group is being attacked, only she matters and all the harm done to the group is reduced in a non-empathetical way by means of self-victimization or theft/parasitism of the feelings of entitlement from the harm done to the group. Thus "me" refers more to herself as invidual only and only to the group as an opportunistic means to feed off of the groups resources.
The other possible "me" would be a generalization of the woman onto the group. So that if the group is attacked, the woman empathetically thinks of the group as extension of herself so that if the group is harmed, she too feels the harm as if it was done to herself. This is a positive perspective of the same idea of selfishness.
in other words do women see themselves as the group or do they see the group as part of themselves.
It's obvious that the former is the case. But I'm not sure which one Lanza means.
Last edited:
Y
Remember incels are weird for discussing this but it's okay for women to make groups eagerly speculating about and discussing the motives of male killers @Mainländer
M
Foids can do no wrong in cuck gynocentric world.
Yes, Lamza was a very puzzling individual. He showed some psychopathic traits, but at the same time, showed some oversensitivity to the brutality of life that psychopaths don't have. He seemed to be a pedophile, super high IQ, autistic and he played Dance Dance Revolution, which isn't something you'd expect something like him to play at all. I don't understand why foids didn't express interest for him after the attacks like they do with other mass killers. I think he was ugly enough to prevent it from happening even in these circumstances...
Y
Adam Lanza suffered from autism which probably complicated his life a lot tbh
He will never be sympathized with by many though because in the end he chose to harm his mother and children at an elementary school before killing himself.
That's exactly it imo. Even darktriadmaxxing and hybristophilia has limits. Just like statusmaxxing.
Yeah Lanza's face screams aspie trucel.
Only read the first page but high IQ.
Who was this guy? A school shooter? I've seen his pics b4 but I dunno anything about what he's done
Who was this guy? A school shooter? I've seen his pics b4 but I dunno anything about what he's done
This shooting was fishy as fuck, never bothered to get too invested in the background of lanza because the whole ordeal seemed to be glowing. Jfl is you believe this shit happened
not only were those eyes awful, but he also had a silly face and this is fatal for being the object of school bullying. He was practically a living doormat.
number of atoms in the universe IQ
The jew that wrote that was brilliant!
Best psiop ever!
Best psiop ever!
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
