Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal Life is suffering and ennui when you aren't having sex with teenage girls

subhuman

subhuman

Dazed and bedpilled
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Posts
11,504
Liberalism is a failed ideology that has left us with a fragmented and atomized society. People have always conceived of themselves in terms of some grander metaphysical purpose. But liberalism's incessant notions of individual autonomy and inalienable rights have eroded the foundations of the institutions that once gave our lives meaning. Specifically, we have lost a deeper connection with other people; not just social connections, but the embeddedness of a community and its history. If you ever want to see just how little people think of their community, you only need to look at how they are ok with letting in massive numbers of immigrants. They are just shitting all over their community and history.

Individualism is a room temperature IQ ideology, and I don't even think it's really a tenable position anymore. Because when you think about it, how can we define ourselves without an unbreakable connection to the world around us? Individuals, as stable, coherent, self-contained entities, are an illusion. We are the product of social, cultural, and historical forces. The goal of individualism is to "free" the individual, but ironically it has become the oppressive institution it sought to destroy. Individualism limits us and reduces us to isolated, fragmented beings disconnected from our roots. Without anything to derive meaning from, and without meaningful connections to other people, we lead lonely and meaningless lives.

Individual existence is a dangerous illusion as it reinforces existing power structures and tools of social control. I think the most relevant of these to us is the libidinal economy. One of liberalism's "greatest achievements" was womens liberation. According to reddit soys, women should be free to have the sex life that they desire. If they don't desire to have sex with us, we should respect their right to make that decision. But from whence do these desires arise? Our desires are not our own, as is commonly thought, but are intimately related to larger social and economic forces. The driving force behind desire is libidinal energy, but in liberal societies this is harnessed and channeled through social systems like the economy. Our economy acts a libidinal machine that regulates desire by controlling the amount and flow of libidinal energy.

Totally devoid of any purpose or meaning, people today fill the void of atomization with libertinism: short term hookups, pornography, etc. Sexual encounters in the modern era aren't really meaningful, rather they are spurred on by a sense of boredom; a distraction from the emptiness and loneliness of our modern lives. People have become objects to be consumed, goyslop like marvel movies and mcdonalds, rather than human beings that should be loved and valued. The rise in sexual consumerism has been exploited by the markets of the libidinal economy, and we are reduced to just a commodified image, which is why looks are so important now. This is what Houellebecq means when he says "sexual liberalism is an extension of the domain of struggle to all ages and classes of society". Sexuality has become a struggle to assert our own interests against the restrictive forces of the libidinal economy. This is why I always thought it was stupid to try to ascend. I've always been conscious of a barrier in our culture that is so despairingly present and all encompassing, that it seemed to me much more realistic to just LDARmax.

One of the failures of the incel "movement", if you can call it that, is that I don't see people take issue with the nature of relationships today. Instead they accept and actually glorify them by wanting to ascend. Although, it does seem like this forum is mostly failed normies with active social lives instead of true outcasts and permarotters. I don't really think there is anything special about adult relationships and sex. Normies lives are just as lonely and meaningless as us, they just accept it so long as they get mediocre sex. Basically just the same as escortceling.

What's brutal is we are basically trapped in this nightmare of an existence. I don't really think geomaxxing will get us out of this because any country with a good culture won't let foreigners in (if you think they will, JFL at how you think its normal for people to be ok with immigrants taking a shit all over their communities). However, I do see a glimmer of hope. During adolescence, people are free to express their desires as they want and aren't yet fully shaped by their society. They still maintain some level of purity and innocence, especially if they are virgins. It's only from teenagers that you can get the purest and most intense love.

I don't think it's unethical to have sex with teenage girls. Libshits and retards will argue they aren't developed enough to be able to consent. But the truth is these girls are being molded and influenced by the destructive influences of societal institutions, and they can't consent to that either. It's not like these girls are being raised in total isolation until they reach some arbitrary age where they can think critically about sexuality. Again the insistence on individual choice only serves to reinforce existing power structures...
 
dnd rd but yes, we should tear down the gynocracy, burn it. And install an androcentric dictatorship made of bodies, militaries and corporations of androcentric blackpill-conscious men. Join the Androcentric party.
 
 
Come in and voice your views on liberalism
 
That's why religion/spirituality is required for a society to function.
 
White nationalism is the only way
 
I don't think teenage foids are any "purer" or more innocent than the rest, the modern 16 year old foid is on every form of social media possible, worships Chad, and fucks around the same as any other hypergamous older whore; it's nearly impossible to avoid with the Internet, them being told doing it is perfectly healthy and a good thing, and the influences of their friends. They've already been fully shaped by society for the most part. :feelsclown:
 
high IQ post. Very solid. read every word. Although too tired to give a detailed reply.
I don't think teenage foids are any "purer" or more innocent than the rest, the modern 16 year old foid is on every form of social media possible, worships Chad, and fucks around the same as any other hypergamous older whore; it's nearly impossible to avoid with the Internet, them being told doing it is perfectly healthy and a good thing, and the influences of their friends. They've already been fully shaped by society for the most part. :feelsclown:
yes but on average easier to brainwash then jnto control than older foids. which is major key.
 
I don’t need sex and validation from inferior beings.

It doesn’t make any sense to value women, especially for incels.
 
yes but on average easier to brainwash then jnto control than older foids. which is major key.
Almost impossible to do as a sub 5 when you're competing with other influences from pretty much everything else the foid consumes. :society:
 
The sexual revolution was a mistake. Fuck boomers
 
The sexual revolution was a mistake. Fuck boomers
There should be an androcentric sexual revolution, carried out by androcentric blackpill-conscious men
 
Is this the longest post on this site?
 
There is no such thing as "innocent" teenage foids. No one is truly innocent even when they're born.
 
I don't think teenage foids are any "purer" or more innocent than the rest, the modern 16 year old foid is on every form of social media possible, worships Chad, and fucks around the same as any other hypergamous older whore; it's nearly impossible to avoid with the Internet, them being told doing it is perfectly healthy and a good thing, and the influences of their friends. They've already been fully shaped by society for the most part. :feelsclown:
Almost impossible to do as a sub 5 when you're competing with other influences from pretty much everything else the foid consumes. :society:
There is no such thing as "innocent" teenage foids. No one is truly innocent even when they're born.
All good points. I remember I spent a lot of time LDARmaxxing in high school because it seemed to me like the hierarchies were already set. The internet was probably the single greatest contributor to atomization, and I can say with confidence that no foid has resisted its corruptive influences. All these little zoomers are glued to their phones. And it seems like most foids start whoring around right when they turn 13 when the attractile drives are unleashed.

However, I do believe that their degradation is of a lesser magnitude than older whores, just because they have had less time exposed to degenerate shit. And as @Transcended Trucel astutely observes, they are quite dumb. I think we can employ some nefarious little stratagems to take advantage of this and get them to pleasure us. Like sell weed to them and get them to smash for dope.
 
Last edited:
I think we can employ some nefarious little stratagems to take advantage of this and get them to pleasure us. Like sell weed to them and get them to smash for dope.
All in video games of course:feelsthink:.
 
One of the failures of the incel "movement", if you can call it that, is that I don't see people take issue with the nature of relationships today. Instead they accept and actually glorify them by wanting to ascend.
I've given up trying to ascend. I just find ways to cope and take gleeful joy when a brocel enacts retribution (in gta)
 
High IQ. Individualism has its flaws because it doesn't provide immunity to the so-called 'matrix'. In reality, people are products of their environment by which their identites are formed and socially conditioned. A person's identity would be shaped by the values and common practices of the culture by which they are socialized. People don't choose to become their own person. They are compelled to adopt a certain character by external influences (e.g. media, social institutions, the social world)

If you can make someone think they are independent, it will be easier to control their thought process and their mindset. Because independence doesn't prevent vulnerability to environmental influences, such as the media, curriculum of the education system, informative material in other social institutions, as well as the status quo in their immediate social milieu

Through individualism, people don't become free. They become more vulnerable to external influences that are put in place and regulated by the elites of the world. Liberation is not achieved through the increase of freedom to action, but through the ability to think independently, without the influence of any doctrine / belief system (that hasn't been proven beyond refutability)
 
Last edited:
Specifically, we have lost a deeper connection with other people; not just social connections, but the embeddedness of a community and its history. If you ever want to see just how little people think of their community, you only need to look at how they are ok with letting in massive numbers of immigrants. They are just shitting all over their community and history.
This is also happening because of the globalist notion that people are strictly a product of their own time period without any genetic inheritance that relates to the creation of cultural artifacts.
 
Liberalism is a failed ideology that has left us with a fragmented and atomized society. People have always conceived of themselves in terms of some grander metaphysical purpose. But liberalism's incessant notions of individual autonomy and inalienable rights have eroded the foundations of the institutions that once gave our lives meaning. Specifically, we have lost a deeper connection with other people; not just social connections, but the embeddedness of a community and its history. If you ever want to see just how little people think of their community, you only need to look at how they are ok with letting in massive numbers of immigrants. They are just shitting all over their community and history.

Individualism is a room temperature IQ ideology, and I don't even think it's really a tenable position anymore. Because when you think about it, how can we define ourselves without an unbreakable connection to the world around us? Individuals, as stable, coherent, self-contained entities, are an illusion. We are the product of social, cultural, and historical forces. The goal of individualism is to "free" the individual, but ironically it has become the oppressive institution it sought to destroy. Individualism limits us and reduces us to isolated, fragmented beings disconnected from our roots. Without anything to derive meaning from, and without meaningful connections to other people, we lead lonely and meaningless lives.

Individual existence is a dangerous illusion as it reinforces existing power structures and tools of social control. I think the most relevant of these to us is the libidinal economy. One of liberalism's "greatest achievements" was womens liberation. According to reddit soys, women should be free to have the sex life that they desire. If they don't desire to have sex with us, we should respect their right to make that decision. But from whence do these desires arise? Our desires are not our own, as is commonly thought, but are intimately related to larger social and economic forces. The driving force behind desire is libidinal energy, but in liberal societies this is harnessed and channeled through social systems like the economy. Our economy acts a libidinal machine that regulates desire by controlling the amount and flow of libidinal energy.

Totally devoid of any purpose or meaning, people today fill the void of atomization with libertinism: short term hookups, pornography, etc. Sexual encounters in the modern era aren't really meaningful, rather they are spurred on by a sense of boredom; a distraction from the emptiness and loneliness of our modern lives. People have become objects to be consumed, goyslop like marvel movies and mcdonalds, rather than human beings that should be loved and valued. The rise in sexual consumerism has been exploited by the markets of the libidinal economy, and we are reduced to just a commodified image, which is why looks are so important now. This is what Houellebecq means when he says "sexual liberalism is an extension of the domain of struggle to all ages and classes of society". Sexuality has become a struggle to assert our own interests against the restrictive forces of the libidinal economy. This is why I always thought it was stupid to try to ascend. I've always been conscious of a barrier in our culture that is so despairingly present and all encompassing, that it seemed to me much more realistic to just LDARmax.

One of the failures of the incel "movement", if you can call it that, is that I don't see people take issue with the nature of relationships today. Instead they accept and actually glorify them by wanting to ascend. Although, it does seem like this forum is mostly failed normies with active social lives instead of true outcasts and permarotters. I don't really think there is anything special about adult relationships and sex. Normies lives are just as lonely and meaningless as us, they just accept it so long as they get mediocre sex. Basically just the same as escortceling.

What's brutal is we are basically trapped in this nightmare of an existence. I don't really think geomaxxing will get us out of this because any country with a good culture won't let foreigners in (if you think they will, JFL at how you think its normal for people to be ok with immigrants taking a shit all over their communities). However, I do see a glimmer of hope. During adolescence, people are free to express their desires as they want and aren't yet fully shaped by their society. They still maintain some level of purity and innocence, especially if they are virgins. It's only from teenagers that you can get the purest and most intense love.

I don't think it's unethical to have sex with teenage girls. Libshits and retards will argue they aren't developed enough to be able to consent. But the truth is these girls are being molded and influenced by the destructive influences of societal institutions, and they can't consent to that either. It's not like these girls are being raised in total isolation until they reach some arbitrary age where they can think critically about sexuality. Again the insistence on individual choice only serves to reinforce existing power structures...
Get a shack in the woods pronto
 
I will never have sex with an innocent pure teenage girl :cryfeels::feelsrope:
MTUucG5n
 

Similar threads

Efiliste
Replies
16
Views
303
PhilipBlake
PhilipBlake
1nsomniak
Replies
3
Views
137
downtoearth
downtoearth
SlayerSlayer
Replies
60
Views
3K
Nagger
Nagger
Flagellum_Dei
Replies
10
Views
171
gymcellragefuel
gymcellragefuel
Tacomonkey
Replies
6
Views
184
Tacomonkey
Tacomonkey

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top