subhuman
So often fragile power turns to scorn and ridicule
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
- Posts
- 11,644
Liberalism is a failed ideology that has left us with a fragmented and atomized society. People have always conceived of themselves in terms of some grander metaphysical purpose. But liberalism's incessant notions of individual autonomy and inalienable rights have eroded the foundations of the institutions that once gave our lives meaning. Specifically, we have lost a deeper connection with other people; not just social connections, but the embeddedness of a community and its history. If you ever want to see just how little people think of their community, you only need to look at how they are ok with letting in massive numbers of immigrants. They are just shitting all over their community and history.
Individualism is a room temperature IQ ideology, and I don't even think it's really a tenable position anymore. Because when you think about it, how can we define ourselves without an unbreakable connection to the world around us? Individuals, as stable, coherent, self-contained entities, are an illusion. We are the product of social, cultural, and historical forces. The goal of individualism is to "free" the individual, but ironically it has become the oppressive institution it sought to destroy. Individualism limits us and reduces us to isolated, fragmented beings disconnected from our roots. Without anything to derive meaning from, and without meaningful connections to other people, we lead lonely and meaningless lives.
Individual existence is a dangerous illusion as it reinforces existing power structures and tools of social control. I think the most relevant of these to us is the libidinal economy. One of liberalism's "greatest achievements" was womens liberation. According to reddit soys, women should be free to have the sex life that they desire. If they don't desire to have sex with us, we should respect their right to make that decision. But from whence do these desires arise? Our desires are not our own, as is commonly thought, but are intimately related to larger social and economic forces. The driving force behind desire is libidinal energy, but in liberal societies this is harnessed and channeled through social systems like the economy. Our economy acts a libidinal machine that regulates desire by controlling the amount and flow of libidinal energy.
Totally devoid of any purpose or meaning, people today fill the void of atomization with libertinism: short term hookups, pornography, etc. Sexual encounters in the modern era aren't really meaningful, rather they are spurred on by a sense of boredom; a distraction from the emptiness and loneliness of our modern lives. People have become objects to be consumed, goyslop like marvel movies and mcdonalds, rather than human beings that should be loved and valued. The rise in sexual consumerism has been exploited by the markets of the libidinal economy, and we are reduced to just a commodified image, which is why looks are so important now. This is what Houellebecq means when he says "sexual liberalism is an extension of the domain of struggle to all ages and classes of society". Sexuality has become a struggle to assert our own interests against the restrictive forces of the libidinal economy. This is why I always thought it was stupid to try to ascend. I've always been conscious of a barrier in our culture that is so despairingly present and all encompassing, that it seemed to me much more realistic to just LDARmax.
One of the failures of the incel "movement", if you can call it that, is that I don't see people take issue with the nature of relationships today. Instead they accept and actually glorify them by wanting to ascend. Although, it does seem like this forum is mostly failed normies with active social lives instead of true outcasts and permarotters. I don't really think there is anything special about adult relationships and sex. Normies lives are just as lonely and meaningless as us, they just accept it so long as they get mediocre sex. Basically just the same as escortceling.
What's brutal is we are basically trapped in this nightmare of an existence. I don't really think geomaxxing will get us out of this because any country with a good culture won't let foreigners in (if you think they will, JFL at how you think its normal for people to be ok with immigrants taking a shit all over their communities). However, I do see a glimmer of hope. During adolescence, people are free to express their desires as they want and aren't yet fully shaped by their society. They still maintain some level of purity and innocence, especially if they are virgins. It's only from teenagers that you can get the purest and most intense love.
I don't think it's unethical to have sex with teenage girls. Libshits and retards will argue they aren't developed enough to be able to consent. But the truth is these girls are being molded and influenced by the destructive influences of societal institutions, and they can't consent to that either. It's not like these girls are being raised in total isolation until they reach some arbitrary age where they can think critically about sexuality. Again the insistence on individual choice only serves to reinforce existing power structures...
Individualism is a room temperature IQ ideology, and I don't even think it's really a tenable position anymore. Because when you think about it, how can we define ourselves without an unbreakable connection to the world around us? Individuals, as stable, coherent, self-contained entities, are an illusion. We are the product of social, cultural, and historical forces. The goal of individualism is to "free" the individual, but ironically it has become the oppressive institution it sought to destroy. Individualism limits us and reduces us to isolated, fragmented beings disconnected from our roots. Without anything to derive meaning from, and without meaningful connections to other people, we lead lonely and meaningless lives.
Individual existence is a dangerous illusion as it reinforces existing power structures and tools of social control. I think the most relevant of these to us is the libidinal economy. One of liberalism's "greatest achievements" was womens liberation. According to reddit soys, women should be free to have the sex life that they desire. If they don't desire to have sex with us, we should respect their right to make that decision. But from whence do these desires arise? Our desires are not our own, as is commonly thought, but are intimately related to larger social and economic forces. The driving force behind desire is libidinal energy, but in liberal societies this is harnessed and channeled through social systems like the economy. Our economy acts a libidinal machine that regulates desire by controlling the amount and flow of libidinal energy.
Totally devoid of any purpose or meaning, people today fill the void of atomization with libertinism: short term hookups, pornography, etc. Sexual encounters in the modern era aren't really meaningful, rather they are spurred on by a sense of boredom; a distraction from the emptiness and loneliness of our modern lives. People have become objects to be consumed, goyslop like marvel movies and mcdonalds, rather than human beings that should be loved and valued. The rise in sexual consumerism has been exploited by the markets of the libidinal economy, and we are reduced to just a commodified image, which is why looks are so important now. This is what Houellebecq means when he says "sexual liberalism is an extension of the domain of struggle to all ages and classes of society". Sexuality has become a struggle to assert our own interests against the restrictive forces of the libidinal economy. This is why I always thought it was stupid to try to ascend. I've always been conscious of a barrier in our culture that is so despairingly present and all encompassing, that it seemed to me much more realistic to just LDARmax.
One of the failures of the incel "movement", if you can call it that, is that I don't see people take issue with the nature of relationships today. Instead they accept and actually glorify them by wanting to ascend. Although, it does seem like this forum is mostly failed normies with active social lives instead of true outcasts and permarotters. I don't really think there is anything special about adult relationships and sex. Normies lives are just as lonely and meaningless as us, they just accept it so long as they get mediocre sex. Basically just the same as escortceling.
What's brutal is we are basically trapped in this nightmare of an existence. I don't really think geomaxxing will get us out of this because any country with a good culture won't let foreigners in (if you think they will, JFL at how you think its normal for people to be ok with immigrants taking a shit all over their communities). However, I do see a glimmer of hope. During adolescence, people are free to express their desires as they want and aren't yet fully shaped by their society. They still maintain some level of purity and innocence, especially if they are virgins. It's only from teenagers that you can get the purest and most intense love.
I don't think it's unethical to have sex with teenage girls. Libshits and retards will argue they aren't developed enough to be able to consent. But the truth is these girls are being molded and influenced by the destructive influences of societal institutions, and they can't consent to that either. It's not like these girls are being raised in total isolation until they reach some arbitrary age where they can think critically about sexuality. Again the insistence on individual choice only serves to reinforce existing power structures...
