Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Let's talk about Bluepilled Cuckservatives and their obsession with the 'Age of Consent' & 'Saving the Children'

  • Thread starter mr9jg8n.f89df874jktq
  • Start date
M

mr9jg8n.f89df874jktq

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Posts
260
Did you know that there are some on the forum?

I'm looking at you

[UWSL]FrothySolutions.[/UWSL]​


[UWSL]Forget the age of consent - are these people even aware of the age of majority as a historical concept?[/UWSL]

[UWSL]If you go back to the times of Ancient Egypt & Mesopotamia you'll find that there was no formal age of majority, so how was adulthood determined? Puberty - between the ages of 13 and 15 a person would be afforded full contractual rights.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]The formal majority age wasn't adopted by societies until the first millennium bc. Different cultures/regions in different time frames maintained different majority ages. In Greece it was 20, in Eastern Asia it varied between 16 and 20 and so on and so forth.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]In the Middle East & Ancient Persia the majority age was 15 - the majority age remained 15 in the Middle East until the Ottoman Empire's collapse* (I will get back to this point later as it is important). 15 is also the age in accordance with sharia - the hadiths describe it as the age the average arab male could grow a beard and hence be considered an adult.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]The Roman Empire had a majority age of 25 and Continental European countries based on Roman Civil Law (such as Spain and France) maintained that as the majority age until the 1700s when they started to lower it.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]What does that mean? Did the Romans and Medieval Europeans consider 24 year olds to be children? Of course not. The majority age was mainly devised for inheritance purposes, meaning that it was the minimum age one could inherit real estate generally and become the patriarch of an extended family. The concept of a nuclear family is a modern liberal concept. Back in the day people would live in tribes/clans; when a woman married into a tribe/clan should became part of it until/if she remarried someone else from another clan. I.E if a woman's husband died - the husband's assets would be administered by the patriarch who would then provide some form of care for the widow. It's a modern liberal idea for widows to inherit the estates of their deceased husbands. The original liberals are of course Conservatives (18th century Classical Liberals).[/UWSL]

[UWSL]In any event the formal majority age besides inheritance purposes didn't mean that much due to the fact that the historical marriage/mating partnership age was about 16 (around 14-15 for females and 17/18 for males). You still see that age being the average in hunter-gatherer societies that have survived up until this day in parts of Africa, South Asia, the Amazon and the South Pacific.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]Here is some additional material. In the context of Roman society, an orphan would automatically become emancipated at age 14, which is actually not too dissimilar from how traditional anglo-american society was governed even up until the early 20th century. Remember, up until that point in time the majority of people didn't attend secondary education (only the wealthy and academically proficient did that) - in fact the majority of people didn't even complete primary education. What would happen is sometime between the ages of 12 and 14 they would either adopt a trade and master it by around ~20 (sometimes a little sooner/later) or they would just go straight into the work force. Traditional Orphanage school for instance only lasted up until the 8th grade so after that point in time - orphans in the US/UK would be expected to start finding employment or an apprenticeship and begin to support themselves.[/UWSL]


[UWSL]In the context of Anglo-American society the majority age was traditionally 21. It was officially 21 in Britain and America until the 1970s upon which it was arbitrarily lowered to 18 in the context of the Vietnam war draft based on the idea that it was considered unfair for people to be drafted into wars they couldn't vote for, and as the voting age was lowered so was the majority age. The majority of third world country elites just get the talking points for their political/social agendas from America/Britain in the form of World Bank/IMF/UN/US pressure upon them to implement whatever laws they want at any given time at the expense of their local laws/cultures.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]*Exhibit A - Donmeh Ataturk hiked the Turkish age of majority to 21 from 15 and then the Kemalists running Turkey later lowered it down to 18 in the 1970s due to US pressure.[/UWSL]


[UWSL]So what is so special about the age of 18 (besides coincidentally being the majority age of the Talmud dating back to 500AD)?[/UWSL]

[UWSL]The whole purpose of consent and child labor laws were to coerce people under 18 from leaving school to get a job or to get married so that people would receive a good 18 years of (((brainwashing))). For practical reasons the consent age is 16 in most of the world because that coincides with the school dropout age. If someone fails the first two years of secondary education it generally means they won't be able to complete it by the time they are 18 - so what are you going to do - force them to stay in school until they are 20?[/UWSL]

[UWSL][UWSL]Child Labor laws also cut down population growth rates. Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations talked about widowed women that owned estates in the American colonies were sought out by British bachelors due to the fact that their children would be working for them and bringing in money for the family - so there was a traditional economic incentive to have children. Children became economic liabilities instead of assets with the passage of child labor laws.[/UWSL][/UWSL]

[UWSL]The whole idea behind the consent age and child labor laws was to ensure the (((education))) of the population. Biological Reality is immaterial - the only principle that matters is (((salvation))) through the (((education system))) as a (((human right))) - the latter of course being an arbitrary concept as different cultures/peoples are based on different evolutionary conditions and as such maintain different innate concepts of what is a (((right))).[/UWSL]
 
no tomato for the potato
 
a whole essay just to not be read
 
If she bleeds, she breeds
 
a whole essay just to not be read
Brutal.
Furthermore, @FrothySolutions has the support and approval from mods, he was criticized a lot by different members but he's still here. I think we'll wake up one day to find him deleted his account :smonk:
 
Brutal.
Furthermore, @FrothySolutions has the support and approval from mods, he was criticized a lot by different members but he's still here. I think we'll wake up one day to find him deleted his account :smonk:

Why do you think that is the case?
 

Attachments

  • Captur1e.PNG
    Captur1e.PNG
    108.1 KB · Views: 15
Nothing will prevent me from fucking JB prime pussy if I have the chance. NOTHING.
 
Brutal.
Furthermore, @FrothySolutions has the support and approval from mods, he was criticized a lot by different members but he's still here. I think we'll wake up one day to find him deleted his account :smonk:

Never! I'll just leave quietly.
 
Most conservacucks only access to pussy is their disgusting aging overweight pig wives.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
18
Views
438
Lonelyus
Lonelyus
Jealous Freak
Replies
21
Views
978
supermaxxer
supermaxxer
Lurkercel0
Replies
9
Views
182
failedbbcnormie
F
sinclair_silence
Replies
13
Views
298
Efiliste
Efiliste

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top