Idk, I don't agree with the chads are nicer normies narrative, at the end of the day most have the same mentality as normies and foids to look down on the lower level men they just have advantages. But atleast they're not pretending to be successful when they're not
I disagree
A normie is by definition a mediocre individual. He isnt particularly good at anything. This deeply upsets them. Nobody wants to be a norman in life, everyone wants to be remarkable at something. The norman doesnt have this, which more often than not make his life bitter, even though they are in "moderate" difficulty. They have to COPE with the feeling of emptyness, this makes them attack social outcasts "i'm mediocre at everything, buy hey, at least im not an incel!!". This is the mentality plagued in IT and the like.
In the other hand CHAD knows he's way above average, at least in looks, and most of the time, also in sports. His life isnt bitter. A true chad (this is: not a gymmaxxed norman nor a chadlite) will never have to COPE shitting on incels online. He might laugh at you, but always believing that hes laughing "with" you, thinking your disgrace with women isnt that important, since he has never felt that.
This also means CHAD can, and will, appreciate an incel for other features, for example intelligence. It is not an uncommon thing for chad to praise incels for their brains, while this is unheard of from medium tier stacys and normans. Because the day the do so, they'll lose their value, they will not be "mediocre but at least better than an incel", they will be just "mediocre", since the incel might be remarkable at something.
In conclusion, CHAD could appreciate you if you're good at something, while normans will reduce you to your sexual activities to feed their collective COPE narrative. This is a fact. Although, if you're not good at anything, and also you fail with women, then nobodys gonna give two shits for you, thats how it is.
