There's other cases where consent is not given, but the thing is still good. Say someone drowned at the ocean, should the lifeguard not give CPR since they didn't give consent? No, the person didn't consent but they will be glad to be resuscitated.
Sometimes there may even be consent to not receive. Take people who fast to die. They'll refuse food, but they might be forcefed. This is good because it keeps them alive.
Given these facts, we should ask ourselves if rape is wrong since it's defined as sex without consent. Well, like life, it's good though this doesn't mean you should do it. Rape should never be done. Rape is always wrong. It should be legalized because the rapist is glad to have raped just as the drowned person is glad to be resuscitated despite not giving consent. The rape victim is probably glad too since that's her fantasy.
Therefore rape laws are not compatible with pro-life ethic because rape laws are supported by the same logic used by anti-natalists, who support abortion and say the person didn't consent to being born so it's wrong to be born.
Sometimes there may even be consent to not receive. Take people who fast to die. They'll refuse food, but they might be forcefed. This is good because it keeps them alive.
Given these facts, we should ask ourselves if rape is wrong since it's defined as sex without consent. Well, like life, it's good though this doesn't mean you should do it. Rape should never be done. Rape is always wrong. It should be legalized because the rapist is glad to have raped just as the drowned person is glad to be resuscitated despite not giving consent. The rape victim is probably glad too since that's her fantasy.
Therefore rape laws are not compatible with pro-life ethic because rape laws are supported by the same logic used by anti-natalists, who support abortion and say the person didn't consent to being born so it's wrong to be born.
