NorthernWind
Paragon
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2021
- Posts
- 17,556
Tbh no suprise.
Poor families also can be nepotist.Tbh no suprise.
Nepotism is something you can't really fight with. Even if communists achieved their material aegalitarian society people would treat the offspring of famous people and the offspring of doctors, lawyers, engineers, architecs etc differently. Socialmaxing would occupy the space money has now.
Yeah and?Poor families also can be nepotist.
But they're still remain poor.
But why they were at the top in the first place?Yeah and?
My point was that thanks to nepotism and caring more for your own then for meticulous people their family managed to pass down the wealth.
Do you think somebody would rather educate somebody with skills and spend money on that person rather then pour it into their own child?
Only the wealhiest would if they could get something from it. You basically ingrain an debt into a person like that. Whole point of the loyalty + hustling combo making you valueable.
How they became like that in the beginning, may not have been through nepotism, but staying wealthy sure was thanks to nepotism (of course not only).But why they were at the top in the first place?
Not because of nepotism, of course.
It's more connected to an existence of natural inequality among humans.
Some people are destined to be at the top due to their personal qualities. They're naturally superior.