Kant is easier for me to read than locke and descartes

[pedrolopezwasright]

I started reading "Critique of pure reason" and everything makes sense. Kant derives everything from logically principles; Where there are two a priori conditions of intuition time and space. Time is a priori since empirically anything can be assumed only in relation to time itself, and time is successive(inner condition) transcendental not empirical in itself. Space is a priori since objects are movable in space, but space is space transcendental in itself (outer condition).
@Flagellum_Dei @Horatio Alger @Anarcho Nihilist

 

[elf]

I started reading "Critique of pure reason" and everything makes sense. Kant derives everything from logically principles; Where there are two a priori conditions of intuition time and space. Time is a priori since empirically anything can be assumed only in relation to time itself, and time is successive(inner condition) transcendental not empirical in itself. Space is a priori since objects are movable in space, but space is space transcendental in itself (outer condition).
@Flagellum_Dei @Horatio Alger @Anarcho Nihilist

I think people see all the new words and short circuit or something

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Transcendental aesthetic is indeed intuitional, logical part is harder. But ideal of pure reason seem artificially derived from a priori reason: "I have to have an absolute idea I can relate phenomenons to in order to judge them, and it's morality in accordance to a priori singularity of aperception, therefore it's morality having human as the highest goal". But I see at least one problem with his reasoning: there's no way to recognize humanity outside of me, since these are just phenomenons, thus illusions.

 

[pedrolopezwasright]

Transcendental aesthetic is indeed intuitional, logical part is harder. But ideal of pure reason seem artificially derived from a priori reason: "I have to have an absolute idea I can relate phenomenons to in order to judge them, and it's morality in accordance to a priori singularity of aperception, therefore it's morality having human as the highest goal". But I see at least one problem with his reasoning: there's no way to recognize humanity outside of me, since these are just phenomenons, thus illusions.

So basically cathegorical imperative disproven @Flagellum_Dei

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

So basically cathegorical imperative disproven @Flagellum_Dei

yeah. Kant is known for his fetishism of morality, so I even don't bother reading his Justification of Metaphysics of Morality (based on dialectical illusion, now named a practical reason, he critiques so harshly)

 

[poorenglishcel]