Serious Jut be black theory : WE NEED FUCKING PROOF

[Deleted member 4760]

Since the media coverage and news reporting from Alek Minassian incident, there has been a surge of newcel and long gone celmates that came back here and brought back the ''Just be black'' argument as a counter-argument of the popular ''Just be white'' theory...

Look fuckers, I doN't care if you a nazis, an alt-righ or a skin head but you can't just bring that shit without proof....

Chads, no matter what color they are or what ethnicities they are will get laid ,no matter what,wherever they go!!!

The thing is that, ''Just be White'' theory is a FACTUAL theory based on various published artciles and stats ( the one form OKCupid comes to mind as well as various video interviews on Youtbue)...

If you're white, no matter how bad looking you are, you will ALWASY have you chances in third world countries, since caucasian men are seen as rich, more cultivated and is the universal basis standard for what is attractive or not..JUst be white theory, doesn't come from porn or a few slut posts on Reddit and Twitter, it's real observable thing...

Currycels and Ricecels and browncels are the first victim of that since alot of their women drool over the fair european man and only settle for their own ethnics when they have no choice...



Now..about black man...''Just be black'' theory is lie...It actually is ''Just be Tyrone'' (good looking black verison of Chad) or ''Just be Lamar'' (low inhib, thug type average top tier black)...every post I see here talking about JBB are always talking and posting on Stacey's going for the good looking BBC type or thug type black...

that's all you have..pictures...pictures featuring good looking blacks for fuck sake....where are your statistics? your video proofs? your reddit posts where roastis only claim they go for blacks??? YOU HAVE NOTHING!!!

And ffs, you really think we all have BBC? Imagine being black and not having an average lenght dick...imagine how screwed you are for the sex expectations of femoids..you're fucked..even your own girl rejects you...

 

[blackletcel]

please not again

 

[Deleted member 4760]

please not again

sorry man.

 

[BringBackPatriarchy]

I'm pretty sure that if you're white and ugly, you're fucked.

 

[NekoStance]

Race baiting intensifies

 

[_incelinside]

High IQ post

 

[Americanpsycho]

If you are a medditeranean you are fucked tbh

 

[Angry_runt]

There is no proof. Some girls in overwhelmingly white countries (like east europe shitholes) might be attracted to the novelty of fucking a black guy and might not be skilled at judging how attractive a black guy is, but overall not being white is a disadvantage.

 

[Deleted member 2686]

Chads, no matter what color they are or what ethnicities they are will get laid ,no matter what,wherever they go!!!

except for curries, the only type of curry chad that get laid in the west are ones who were 8+ or higher in curryland
[automerge]1526242930[/automerge]

If you are a medditeranean you are fucked tbh

unless you are egyptian like @tehgymcel420 or are african(egyptian,libyan, morrocan) or asian mediterrean(israeli, lebanese, palestinain) and you do not look to swarthy, one can play JBW and slay in asia

 

[Evil Genius]

JBB and JBW are both legit theories.

JBA and JBC doesn't exist though, well not enough in large enough numbers to get a theory or trend out of it.

 

[BringBackPatriarchy]

There is no proof. Some girls in overwhelmingly white countries (like east europe shitholes) might be attracted to the novelty of fucking a black guy and might not be skilled at judging how attractive a black guy is, but overall not being white is a disadvantage.

This.

BBC is just mindless trolling, which is why its pointless debating those idiots. Of course it's worse to be nonwhite on average. Look at the hordes of nonwhites flooding into traditionally white countries ffs.

Getting back to BBC: being black is obviously more of a disadvantage than being white, but for genetic and evolutionary rather than institutional reasons. As a group, blacks are low-IQ, crime-prone, r-selected, high-T, low future time oriented, without any history of civilizational achievement. Black women are even more repulsive than the males and perpetually angry because no high quality white man wants to inseminate them with his high quality sperm.

There is such a thing as white privilege, but it's just better genes and higher IQ. This is not, of course, to deny that there are white incels, as everything exists along a statistical continuum.

 

[Hunter]

the only JBB theory is for lightskinned blacks

 

[Tellem-T]

JBB and JBW are both legit theories.

JBA and JBC doesn't exist though, well not enough in large enough numbers to get a theory or trend out of it.

JBB is not legit because you have to bring something to the table as black man, JBB Is basically just be NT-low inhib mainstream BET like swagger theory,

Meanwhile jbw is literal,

 

[Bronzehawkattack]

This.

BBC is just mindless trolling, which is why its pointless debating those idiots. Of course it's worse to be nonwhite on average. Look at the hordes of nonwhites flooding into traditionally white countries ffs.

Getting back to BBC: being black is obviously more of a disadvantage than being white, but for genetic and evolutionary rather than institutional reasons. As a group, blacks are low-IQ, crime-prone, r-selected, high-T, low future time oriented, without any history of civilizational achievement. Black women are even more repulsive than the males and perpetually angry because no high quality white man wants to inseminate them with his high quality sperm.

There is such a thing as white privilege, but it's just better genes and higher IQ. This is not, of course, to deny that there are white incels, as everything exists along a statistical continuum.

JFL though, for real. Somehow you managed to deny institutional reasons being why black men are less desired but instead attributed it being to inferior genetics? Blacks supposedly being low-IQ isn't a valid reasons for why the statistics show what they do, with Blacks being rated as less attractive and women of all races being less receptive to their romantic advances, those would come from institutional factors, not substantial factors like Blacks apparently being too low IQ to get pussy.

Now don't try and back pedal by saying "Online stats and research are the way they are because women know Blacks are inferior genetically!!!" because once again that would be institutional, not genetic reasoning. If you did claim that it was genetic reasoning you would have to expand this to East Asians, Indians, and Middle-Easterns whom all likewise score poorly in these statistics just like blacks do, and would have to inversely consider Hispanics (Most of whom are around the shade of a brown paper bag than they are white) genetically superior to all the aforementioned ethnicities since -- depending on the study -- they only slightly score worse than white men do. Stats being referred to:

https://theblog.okcupid.com/how-your-race-affects-the-messages-you-get-39c68771b99e
Note how white men had a higher reply rate among all races than any other race of men.

https://theblog.okcupid.com/race-and-attraction-2009-2014-107dcbb4f060
Note how white men got a positive score from everyone except for black women whom they got a neutral rating from, even white women didn't get positive scores across the board.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Note how once again, white men had a very high probability of getting replies compared to other races, specifically this time from ethnic women more than white women, but even then they still were the only ones white women showed interest in.

All in all, ironically a very low-IQ post. I wonder if it was a black man behind it all. Probably not. Why are white supremacists on this website consistently very dumb?

 

[VST]

Just fucking go to Poland,
Those whores should provide you with enough proof.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

 

[BringBackPatriarchy]

JFL though, for real. Somehow you managed to deny institutional reasons being why black men are less desired but instead attributed it being to inferior genetics? Blacks supposedly being low-IQ isn't a valid reasons for why the statistics show what they do, with Blacks being rated as less attractive and women of all races being less receptive to their romantic advances, those would come from institutional factors, not substantial factors like Blacks apparently being too low IQ to get pussy.

Now don't try and back pedal by saying "Online stats and research are the way they are because women know Blacks are inferior genetically!!!" because once again that would be institutional, not genetic reasoning. If you did claim that it was genetic reasoning you would have to expand this to East Asians, Indians, and Middle-Easterns whom all likewise score poorly in these statistics just like blacks do, and would have to inversely consider Hispanics (Most of whom are around the shade of a brown paper bag than they are white) genetically superior to all the aforementioned ethnicities since -- depending on the study -- they only slightly score worse than white men do.

What is this nonsense? Blacks are an inferior race for purely biological reasons. This is an easily demonstrated objective fact. Are you saying that black inferiority is the result of white oppression and racism? Africans never developed a written language or the wheel during their thousands of years of habitation in Africa. This was long before the age of European exploration. Of course black inferiority has nothing to do with institutional factors.

White women reject blacks for genetic reasons... duh. They reject other races for the same reasons, with the possible exception of "Latinos," many of whom happen to be of European extraction. I fail to see how people interested in mating with people who look like them is somehow institutionally mediated. After all, sexual arousal is a physical thing.

Overall, low IQ response.

 

[Bronzehawkattack]

What is this nonsense? Blacks are an inferior race for purely biological reasons. This is an easily demonstrated objective fact. Are you saying that black inferiority is the result of white oppression and racism? Africans never developed a written language or the wheel during their thousands of years of habitation in Africa. This was long before the age of European exploration. Of course black inferiority has nothing to do with institutional factors.

White women reject blacks for genetic reasons... duh. They reject other races for the same reasons, with the possible exception of "Latinos," many of whom happen to be of European extraction. I fail to see how people interested in mating with people who look like them is somehow institutionally mediated. After all, sexual arousal is a physical thing.

Overall, low IQ response.

I was saying that Blacks being rejected in the dating market was due to institutional factors, not genetic ones. I'm not even acknowledging the whole "Whites are genetically superior to everyone!" thing as legitimate, we both know it's not.

Most Latino's don't look very European, the fact that they have comparable stats to Whites kinda puts a dent in your theory. Your rant on the genetic inferiority of blacks also doesn't apply to Asians, as they have indeed developed a written language and the wheel, yet they're penalized just as/more harshly than blacks in the dating market by women of all races.

Also following this logic we are all here as incels because we are genetically inferior to other men, and in fact genetic inferior to women of all races, correct? After all, since we're using dating success a measurement of genetic superiority, that would apply to us as individuals, no?

Again, very low-IQ theory that with 5 seconds of thinking you should have figured out has a lot of holes in it. Directly linking dating success with geneticism in the way you have makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

 

[BringBackPatriarchy]

I was saying that Blacks being rejected in the dating market was due to institutional factors, not genetic ones. I'm not even acknowledging the whole "Whites are genetically superior to everyone!" thing as legitimate, we both know it's not.

Most Latino's don't look very European, the fact that they have comparable stats to Whites kinda puts a dent in your theory. Your rant on the genetic inferiority of blacks also doesn't apply to Asians, as they have indeed developed a written language and the wheel, yet they're penalized just as/more harshly than blacks in the dating market by women of all races.

Also following this logic we are all here as incels because we are genetically inferior to other men, and in fact genetic inferior to women of all races, correct? After all, since we're using dating success a measurement of genetic superiority, that would apply to us as individuals, no?

Again, very low-IQ theory that with 5 seconds of thinking you should have figured out has a lot of holes in it. Directly linking dating success with geneticism in the way you have makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Actually, many "Latinos" do have a substantial European component. You would know that if you bothered to consult genome-wide analyses of Latin American populations. This is why they are successful with white women.

Asians, although more advanced than Africans, are still inferior to whites in terms of civilizational achievement. Again, they're largely rejected by white women for genetic reasons i.e. they don't have what they're looking for in terms of genetic quality.

Of course mating success is positively correlated with underlying genetic structure, unless you're saying white women overwhelmingly reject blacks because of their social skills and personality. Sexual arousal is determined by physical and genetic factors. If you can't find anyone willing to mate with you than yes, your genes are inferior.

A lot of blue-pilled thinking here.

 

[Cynistic]

BBC theory is fkin cope.
Only low IQ retards believe this shit.

 

[backyardslayer]

JBB and JBW are both legit theories.

JBA and JBC doesn't exist though, well not enough in large enough numbers to get a theory or trend out of it.

How is this subhuman nigger coper still not banned yet?

 

[Bronzehawkattack]

Actually, many "Latinos" do have a substantial European component. You would know that if you bothered to consult genome-wide analyses of Latin American populations. This is why they are successful with white women.

Asians, although more advanced than Africans, are still inferior to whites in terms of civilizational achievement. Again, they're largely rejected by white women for genetic reasons i.e. they don't have what they're looking for in terms of genetic quality.

Of course mating success is positively correlated with underlying genetic structure, unless you're saying white women overwhelmingly reject blacks because of their social skills and personality. Sexual arousal is determined by physical and genetic factors. If you can't find anyone willing to mate with you than yes, your genes are inferior.

A lot of blue-pilled thinking here.

Like I said, many Latinos don't look very European, look at any typical Mexican. Maybe an Argentinian would look European, but that's about it.

So you're saying we are genetically inferior to the many Blacks that do get laid? Because you are a virgin, despite being white, you're inferior to the very thing you're claiming is an inferior race.

White supremacists aren't very smart.

 

[Captvic]

JFL though, for real. Somehow you managed to deny institutional reasons being why black men are less desired but instead attributed it being to inferior genetics? Blacks supposedly being low-IQ isn't a valid reasons for why the statistics show what they do, with Blacks being rated as less attractive and women of all races being less receptive to their romantic advances, those would come from institutional factors, not substantial factors like Blacks apparently being too low IQ to get pussy.

Now don't try and back pedal by saying "Online stats and research are the way they are because women know Blacks are inferior genetically!!!" because once again that would be institutional, not genetic reasoning. If you did claim that it was genetic reasoning you would have to expand this to East Asians, Indians, and Middle-Easterns whom all likewise score poorly in these statistics just like blacks do, and would have to inversely consider Hispanics (Most of whom are around the shade of a brown paper bag than they are white) genetically superior to all the aforementioned ethnicities since -- depending on the study -- they only slightly score worse than white men do. Stats being referred to:

https://theblog.okcupid.com/how-your-race-affects-the-messages-you-get-39c68771b99e
Note how white men had a higher reply rate among all races than any other race of men.

https://theblog.okcupid.com/race-and-attraction-2009-2014-107dcbb4f060
Note how white men got a positive score from everyone except for black women whom they got a neutral rating from, even white women didn't get positive scores across the board.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Note how once again, white men had a very high probability of getting replies compared to other races, specifically this time from ethnic women more than white women, but even then they still were the only ones white women showed interest in.

All in all, ironically a very low-IQ post. I wonder if it was a black man behind it all. Probably not. Why are white supremacists on this website consistently very dumb?

That's a GG

Theres literally no proof of Just Be Black theory but there is an abundance of Just be White theory. If you are white you are a fucking vocel

 

[Darthmat]

This.

BBC is just mindless trolling, which is why its pointless debating those idiots. Of course it's worse to be nonwhite on average. Look at the hordes of nonwhites flooding into traditionally white countries ffs.

Getting back to BBC: being black is obviously more of a disadvantage than being white, but for genetic and evolutionary rather than institutional reasons. As a group, blacks are low-IQ, crime-prone, r-selected, high-T, low future time oriented, without any history of civilizational achievement. Black women are even more repulsive than the males and perpetually angry because no high quality white man wants to inseminate them with his high quality sperm.

There is such a thing as white privilege, but it's just better genes and higher IQ. This is not, of course, to deny that there are white incels, as everything exists along a statistical continuum.

You need to go back to /pol where all the failure whites hang out.

 

[Deleted member 6501]

JBB or JBW rly

 

[Purification]

I truly believe that hot, hqnp, European white girls need to spread their legs and asses for BBC/ a blackcel. At the very least they should alleviate a blackcels suffering and at the very most white girls should mate with them.

This is the only way to atone for white male privilege and white male entitlement.

 

[blackletcel]

JFL though, for real. Somehow you managed to deny institutional reasons being why black men are less desired but instead attributed it being to inferior genetics? Blacks supposedly being low-IQ isn't a valid reasons for why the statistics show what they do, with Blacks being rated as less attractive and women of all races being less receptive to their romantic advances, those would come from institutional factors, not substantial factors like Blacks apparently being too low IQ to get pussy.

Now don't try and back pedal by saying "Online stats and research are the way they are because women know Blacks are inferior genetically!!!" because once again that would be institutional, not genetic reasoning. If you did claim that it was genetic reasoning you would have to expand this to East Asians, Indians, and Middle-Easterns whom all likewise score poorly in these statistics just like blacks do, and would have to inversely consider Hispanics (Most of whom are around the shade of a brown paper bag than they are white) genetically superior to all the aforementioned ethnicities since -- depending on the study -- they only slightly score worse than white men do. Stats being referred to:

https://theblog.okcupid.com/how-your-race-affects-the-messages-you-get-39c68771b99e
Note how white men had a higher reply rate among all races than any other race of men.

https://theblog.okcupid.com/race-and-attraction-2009-2014-107dcbb4f060
Note how white men got a positive score from everyone except for black women whom they got a neutral rating from, even white women didn't get positive scores across the board.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Note how once again, white men had a very high probability of getting replies compared to other races, specifically this time from ethnic women more than white women, but even then they still were the only ones white women showed interest in.

All in all, ironically a very low-IQ post. I wonder if it was a black man behind it all. Probably not. Why are white supremacists on this website consistently very dumb?

saved for bbc theory fags