Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Just because it's nature, doesn't make it good

  • Thread starter Arthur Copenhauer
  • Start date
And that simply means that those attributes and characteristics are beneficial for survival in their current environment. It looks like it's in no way possible to be advantageous, but there is always a method to nature's madness.
No, just, no. In fact colourful and bright plumage is bad for survivability because it makes you more obvious to predators. Peacock's plumage slows down their flying speed and makes them easier to catch. There is no advantage whatsoever to traits developed for attractiveness, in fact it is usually the opposite, they usually decrease the survivability of the animal for the purpose of making them do better in intraspecies competition. The reason why these traits propogate is because more attractive animals mate more, so in this case sexual selection is decreasing the survivability of the species.
 
No, just, no. In fact colourful and bright plumage is bad for survivability because it makes you more obvious to predators. Peacock's plumage slows down their flying speed and makes them easier to catch. There is no advantage whatsoever to traits developed for attractiveness, in fact it is usually the opposite, they usually decrease the survivability of the animal for the purpose of making them do better in intraspecies competition. The reason why these traits propogate is because more attractive animals mate more, so in this case sexual selection is decreasing the survivability of the species.

Sexual selection is something you see across multiple types of species. If a handful of species practiced it, you could file it away under anomalous, aberrant behavior. But clearly the phenomenon is still active and selection is still happening this way.

Nature doesn't do anything that's illogical in the big picture. The fact that this phenomenon persists implies that something systematic is occurring and that it can't logically be attributed to something whimsical.
 
Does anyone else fully accept that every issue we have in regards to gender dynamics is completely natural, yet still furious when faced with it?
It's natural that men are cucks and orbiters to women.

Going to have to disagree with this one. You need to read up on older societies and civilizations. Women were treated significantly worse than they are today.
 
Then why cant we rape and go ER
 

Similar threads

Squatting Slavcel
Replies
19
Views
834
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
Nordicel94
Replies
9
Views
413
GrandWizard_137
GrandWizard_137
Numetalist
Replies
20
Views
2K
Numetalist
Numetalist
H
Replies
4
Views
441
Highfield78
H
PersonaPimp
Replies
21
Views
408
DutchCel01
DutchCel01

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top