JFL, I don't have a clue how Spics behave since I've never met one in my entire life, my best guess would be close to Pinoys (most annoying group I've ever met socially), not as thuggish as Blacks but still arrogant and annoying as fuck
I would say they are quite similar to Pinoys: Pinoys & other islander types are far more NTmaxxed as opposed to other Asiatics, which is partially why I say that JBW is overstated, since many South-East Asians are quite NT-centric, which ofc will make it much harder if you're Autistic, Schizo, etc.
Living around Spics, especially if you are Non-NT, is generally not a pleasant experience: They are giga-NT hypersocial normies, who think that aggression/being a dick in general is "cool" & acceptable. Not to mention, their whole "culture" is very similar to Nigger culture, which I'm sure you already know my stance on. Generally, it seems White normies tend to kind of like/adopt these parts of their "culture" since they perceive it as "cool" due to the fact it promotes r-selective behaviors(aggression, sexual promiscuity, etc).
Some of the worst "friends" I ever had were Hispanic; usually backstabbing cunts. Their foids were also some of the rudest to me by far, even if I wasn't trying to approach them. Whenever I go outside, I usually see Hispanic guys who are around my looks-level or even lower(not deformed ugly though) with a looksmatch & 3-4 kids running around.
Good. Wish that was the same for curries, many of them are docile cucks who would open their legs for foreigners. I understand it's difficult to blame them, because curries are arrogant to each other so naturally they turn to other groups to feel accepted when in reality everyone just views them as typical shitskin.
It seems this is the case: Tons of Curry normies I have observed online, including some who are LARPing here, seemingly have this mentality of punching-down on other castes/regions, or trying to shift the blame towards them. It seems this happens a lot with religion also, and I also find it quite humorous when North Curries & Pakis fight online, since they are both quite similar in many ways, including genetics, and are more similar to one another it seems as opposed to North v South Curries.
There hasn't been a nationalist movement in India until very recently, before people fought for their own interests rather than their country so it was easy to take over during the colonial era, a few bribes and conspirators were enough to win the battles against the Sultans and Rajas.
I am aware that many local leaders decided to become sell-outs & also picked sides against one-another, simply for personal gain, and I also imagine that religion and/or cultural/ethno-lingiustic regions played a role.
I don't care if my people are 'subhuman' or haven't achieved anything, I was born into it, there's no use trying to escape an identity engraved in you.
In a way, I think that this also kind of explains why myself & others are "ethnonationalist" in a way: Yes, I am sub-5, non-nt, a framelet, etc. & still at the bottom of all social hierarchies, but I am still White, and in the current climate of this country, that means that my race in a way, is all I have left. Sure, I am at the bottom of it all, but I am part of it still: Whereas to non-Whites, I am autistic & sub-5, but also not even one of them.
I don't have concrete evidence, it's just interpreting history honestly.
fair enough.
Also, it makes pragmatic & logical sense to assume that the US alphabet-agencies would attempt to do this: If they did it to MENA countries which are literally no threat to us, why wouldn't they do the same to a country which is much larger in population, has more military strength, more global influence, etc.
@Biowaste Removal you have anything on this?
I would say Africa can use this excuse but the Middle East can't. The Middle East can unify based on their language and religion, it has so in the past anyways. Whereas Africa has always been divided because of their tribal mindset, that's why there's so many Black gangs in America, it's a similar mindset. Gangs in black enclaves is just a biproduct of their tribalism in a civilised society.
This is true to an extent in my opinion: The Middle-East does have a lot to unify it, which has unified it in the past.
Yes, Africa does have more diversity internally, but they got colonized much harder, and thus had more of a sense of "unity" against the Imperialism they were under in a sense.
And yeah, I think that the nature of extreme tribalism is just so heavily ingrained into the nature Africans at this point.
The Middle East (non-oil states) is underdeveloped because they can't deter Israel and America, they are weak and don't have the same fighting capabilities as East Asians
@Made in Heaven thoughts?
In way, perhaps this proves East Asian males are not as "soy" as many may claim them to be: Clearly, they posses the intellectual & mental resilience to wade-off foreign powers, and also maintain what they have internally. Yes, they may worship Whiteness, but prior to the modern day, they always did so as indicated by the Chinese admiring the Mongol & Turkic barbarians for being "lighter" as opposed to them.
en.wikipedia.org
