6 years ago this week, 19 year old Jamie Griffiths was convicted of sexual assault for trying to make friends with a foid because he touched her elbow and the foid in her mind imagined him touching her breast.
Okay, so touching someone’s elbow when greeting them is a weird passive aggressive NLP thing that creepy businessmen and pop psych foids do but it isn’t sexual assault. At most it’s a sign that the person has read too many “how to win friends and influence people” books.
The magistrates convicted him because they accepted that in his mind he was imagining himself groping her breasts and that if she had not “defended herself”he would have done far worse even though he immediately ran off after touching her elbow.
He was not convicted for what he did. He was convicted for what the foid “victim” imagined in her mind that he was thinking of doing.
The prosecution closing argument spent a lot of time focusing on how weird he was. “He googled how to make a friend; what rational person looks up how to make a friend on the internet” etc. Pf course searching “how to make friends with someone” doesn’t prove guilt. It proves he was just socially crippled and possibly autistic.
Nevertheless this man was convicted of sexual assault and spent 5 years on the sex offender registry.
I use this case when dunning kruger idiots say “I can act out against society and then just deny it because they will never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I did it so I’ll get away with it”. The people deciding if you’re guilty are normies and they will see your ugly face and your autistic behaviour and they will convict you. You may be very naive and trust the system because you’ve lived a sheltered life but Jamie Griffiths is proof that being weird is illegal.
Okay, so touching someone’s elbow when greeting them is a weird passive aggressive NLP thing that creepy businessmen and pop psych foids do but it isn’t sexual assault. At most it’s a sign that the person has read too many “how to win friends and influence people” books.
The magistrates convicted him because they accepted that in his mind he was imagining himself groping her breasts and that if she had not “defended herself”he would have done far worse even though he immediately ran off after touching her elbow.
He was not convicted for what he did. He was convicted for what the foid “victim” imagined in her mind that he was thinking of doing.
The prosecution closing argument spent a lot of time focusing on how weird he was. “He googled how to make a friend; what rational person looks up how to make a friend on the internet” etc. Pf course searching “how to make friends with someone” doesn’t prove guilt. It proves he was just socially crippled and possibly autistic.
Nevertheless this man was convicted of sexual assault and spent 5 years on the sex offender registry.
I use this case when dunning kruger idiots say “I can act out against society and then just deny it because they will never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I did it so I’ll get away with it”. The people deciding if you’re guilty are normies and they will see your ugly face and your autistic behaviour and they will convict you. You may be very naive and trust the system because you’ve lived a sheltered life but Jamie Griffiths is proof that being weird is illegal.
