if you pay attention, they do is constantly
one of my favorite ones that I have been thinking on for a while now is how they simultaneously (!) claim that men are low T now, that men are turning gay and effeminate, but
at the same time they claim men are simping more and more and are too horny, constantly chasing foids, fapping too much etc.
BRO HOW?
its two completely contradictory statements
1. mens testosterone levels are dropping worldwide and men are becoming effeminate
2. mens cant stop cooming and chasing bitches to the point of desperation
Like imagine you said "men are less sexual now, that's why they want more sex."
That's literally what they are saying.
I've run this shit past people and all I get is stupid excuses, because it makes no sense.
Either OnlyFans has a billion dollar turnover rate, or men are no longer interested in sex. Which one is it?
These retards will concoct anything to shit on men I swear.
We have to remember that women are 80% of customer purchases.
This means, that market is done. You don't need to do anything to make women buy shit. They just do that on their own.
But in order to get men to buy your shit, you have to pressure them where it hurts.
- sexual performance
- not getting attention from foids
- attack a mans looks (but not the part of looks you can't change, that would make them hopeless. Thats why they say you need to gymmax instead of say its bones and genetics)
In that line, here is another grifter cope - they accuse men of playing video games, rotting, "consooming" - meanwhile 80-90% of customer purchases are done by women, as I mentioned. Complete inversion of reality.
Women control over $20 trillion in world-wide spending. Learn more about the purchasing power of women, from Millennials to Baby Boomers, in various markets
girlpowermarketing.com
Here is another one - they claim that young people don't read books anymore. Yet, book sales have been steadily increasing for the last 20 years. When kindle came out, people said this is the death of physical books. Nope, physical books still outsell ebooks.
This chart shows the unit sales of printed books in the United States from 2004 to 2021.
www.statista.com
Do you prefer reading an e-book or a physical version? It might be a surprise, but for most people, old school print on paper still wins.
www.cnbc.com
However, the regarded grifters rely on doomsday scenarios about society going to shit and how men have to step up and save it somehow.
They sell this hero-myth to young men, like every one of us is Atlas, carrying the world on his shoulders.
- People are not becoming more retarded, quite the opposite (look into flynn effect for example)
- society is not going down the shitter because men are getting worse
- people don't read less now than they did before
- etc.
Like you said
@Cybersex is our hope these people will say the elite rules society but then want you to contribute to society LMFAO
another one exactly like that, related to what I said above:
They claim the media is 100% corrupted and untrustworthy, but then they believe in anything the media says when it supports their narrative.
And they use the claims of the media to attack men.
One example of this is how they always say the enviornment is killing us now, especially with plastics.
ALL SIDES BELIEVE THIS
UNQUESTIONABLY.
Have you ever seen anyone, right wing or left wing, no matter where, challenge the idea that pollution is real or as bad as they claim?
Think about the interests involved.
Who has an intersted in exaggerating the issue?
Everyone.
It profits everyone.
- the right gets to shit on men and sell you supplements and other shit
- the left uses the same narrative to push climate change agenda and veganism and what not
nobody questions it.
Here is an actually scientific breakdown of the issue that shows how plastics are not dangerous:
plasticsparadox.com
Here is another one.
This guy breaks down how the left deliberately exaggerated the asbestos shit back in the day, which turned asbestos removal into a billion dollar industry over night. And they even admitted it, but nobody cared:
A lot of the current scare stories about "frogs turning gay" and shit, have you double checked where they originate from?
I have. They come from the same universities that right wingers say are "elite propaganda machines."
Like they come from Berkley and shit you know?
So these people will say, OH THESE UNIVERSITIES ARE CIA FRONTS DONT TRUST THEM
and then they use shit coming from the same places to scare you into buying supplements by telling young guys their balls are falling off.
just fucking lol.
this applies to everything btw
- the tranny shit (vastly exaggerated by media throuh selective reporting - check the term "availability cascade" - when the media reports selectively one a few issues, it makes these issues seem massive across the board when they are not)
Let's think about this guys. If people protect foids because of their looks (neoteny), and children are... neotenous? (thats literally what the term means, child like traits)... then will humans ever let anyhting happen to their kids on a large scale?
No. Of course not. That's why even normies fight back against the tranny shit.
It's a government provided, safe way to feel like a rebel.
Meanwhile your country is fighting shadow wars in africa with 1000s of soldiers and normies dont even care.
Why? Because the media did not tell them to care.
Why do people care about the tranny shit? Becaus the media tells them to.
Despite Pentagon assertions, secret programs allow American troops to direct combat raids in Somalia, Kenya, Niger and other African nations.
www.politico.com
Please think about the insane amount of world-changing events happening right now globaly, that the media could focus on.
And yet, what do they focus on?
Shit like trannies.
Think about that for a second.
All sides, left wing, right wing - they all report on the same handpicked issues.
Nothing outside the box.
They are selling you a false dialectic.
It's a distraction. All sides are controlled.
That's why I don't give a shit when people get upset over the tranny shit, they are being distracted with government produced outrage porn on purpose.
There are many examples of this.
Questiong everything and do your own research people.
Here is my final example:
AI and speech + video cloning has existed since the 90s and I can prove it.
Read this article from 1999:
This is why AI is "progressing" so rapidly.
There is no progress. They've had that shit for 30 years, they are just revealing more and more of what they already have.
This connects to another narrative everybody repeats like a parrot but never questions:
- technology will replace workers and destroy society
first off, a huge portion of the human population has not even used the internet faggot, slow down:
The latest numbers from ITU show that roughly 33 percent of the global population is unconnected.
dig.watch
And then there is this AHEM:
Blaming cyborgs instead of bankers and politicians is easy, says Tim Harford
www.ft.com
This was originally published as Appendix A in the EPI report Identifying the Policy Levers Generating Wage Suppression and Wage Inequality. That U.S. workers have “skills deficits,” that is, lack the skills necessary to deal with technological change, including primarily automation, has been...
www.epi.org
The articles point how discrepancies in the narrative, that should get you started if curious.
I want to remind you that all of you are very short-sighted. Very.
You think the issues of our time will be relevant in 20 years.
Meanwhile the articles point out that the automatization narrative has been around for 30 YEARS.
Nothing has happened.
As many of you know, other doomsday predictions like the ones about climate change, have never come true.:
Technology is just the new boogieman. It's part of the same lie.
If you make it to 50, remember me and think back on this.
There will be new scarecrows, and new retards beating the drum for the boogieman of the day.
People may point to AI too, oh yes.
Yet, they don't understand that AI can never be sentient or make true decisions and how this is philosophically impossible.
They don't know about the mind-body issue and other longstanding philosophical issues.
When you break down what AI actually is, it's not very impressive.
It's basically just a powerful version of these text-adventure games from the 80s.
In a few years, AI will become stagnate and be very disappointing, just like VR and other shit. The inherent limitations will become apparent, the hype will die down. Trust me. It has happened to other technologies before.
In fact, you are using one of them right now, it's called the internet.
It did not cause a global revolution, it did not destroy society, it did not make the education system obsolte even though we can get all the lectures and shit for free online now.
The internet by all means should have obliterated civilizations if you think about what it offers. Access to iliegal content, communication between criminals across globe, free education for billions etc.
it did nothing.
People are like "AI will replace teachers!" but we already have that. It's called google retard.
Human nature is more stable than you think, way more stable than you think.
Final appeal: Examine your beliefs closely. Ask yourself if you can actually justify them if questoned.
Sit down with a piece of paper and write them out.
Example
- technology will destroy society
- trannies are a massive problem I should care about
- the war in ukraine matters
- ww3 is about to happen
- there are invisible substances making my pp floppy
- people are becoming more retarded (he thinks, while sitting in front of one of the most complex devices in human history)
a) where did I first hear that? (often starts in childhood, with cartoons and science programs for kids priming you)
b) did I question it when I heared it or did I just accept it because I was primed to believe it? (confirmation bias created by united media front on the issue - availability cascade)
c) have I EVER looked for counter-evidence pro-actively? (important because often people will strawman opposition in media)
d) how hard is it to find opposing opinions? (how dogmatic and widespread is the believe in general)
PROTIP - when it's nigh impossible to find people questoning it, it's dogmatic and defacto religious
e) do I observe what I believe in real life? Am I personally affected? Are people around me, in my country as a whole affected? Or does the threat, the issue only exist in the media? If the media stopped reporting on it, or better, never reported on it in the first place, would anyone care?
Imagine you only had your senses and immedieatly reality available + some hearsay from local community. 99% of these "global issues" would be gone. We are living in artifical media-generated landscape now.
en.wikipedia.org
"new enemies must be identified" - so nobody cared about that shit before? Guys, they are creating your reality for you, wake up.
I will attach an epub file that may be interesting.
It's one of the few anti-environmentalism books:
mega.nz
He makes a good point: Life has never been better.
We have more food than ever.
More entertainment than ever.
Even in 3rd world countries they have television, cars, electricity.
Even the most poor mumbai wagie now lives better than most eurpeans in the 1900s.
So why the fear?
Why the terror news?
When you look at the facts, it looks more like everything has been getting better and better for a while now.
Not worse, at least on a material comforts level.
That's his point.
Personally I think there are biases and attacks, and government policies that fuck people up. And yes, there is an Elite.
I believe in a lot of this shit myself.
I just think that flat-out believing everything that feeds your confirmation bias is retarded.
So, just say vigilant, dig deeper into topics and mentally debate yourself. Imagine your self cross-examining yourself. Question your beliefs, their origin etc.
Thx and sorry for ramble, i fuck wit da luv crew
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ5x8pHoIPA
